Add a Comment
- What shall we call her? Student Tramp Skank Ho God Bless This country we need it! This is why the rest of the world looks at the USA as evil. People like this are pure evil!
- Reply to this comment
- she did nothing wrong. There is a difference in nudism and pornography. Nudism believes in the freedom from the restrictions of clothing, Porn is for sexual gratification. And you may need to check naturistmingle.com out there.
- Reply to this comment
- Okay, so here's the thing. I'm totally respectful of anyone's views that the demo was not appropriate for school. That's fine, and you are entitled to your opinion.
But the facts remain.
1. When they entered the class there was a video on of a woman masturbating, the video concluded saying that the only way for a woman to climax was thru cl*toral stimulation, the demo was a spur of the moment decision/suggestion to dissprove that.
2. That was NOT the entirety of their visit, they still did the Q&A session that they originally went for.
3. What they did was by FAR less graphic than what the 600 students in the class were required to watch, this was an OPTIONAL after class panel, and they were warned that it would be graphic.
4. My guess is NONE of you know them personally, so lashing out at their character is ridiculous and makes you look immature and ignorant, please STOP.
5. Have any students actually stepped forward complaining? No. Why? Because if they stayed they chose to do so aware of what was going on.
6. The teacher has controversial panels regularly, it's a part of his class, a well loved class at the University mind you.
The media will twist things to make them more dramatic and that is precisely what has happened here, and all of you jumping on the bandwagon to bash J.Marcus and F.Kroll are stupid not to realize that.
Before you make judgements on a situation be fully aware of it.
All four of the people "in question" are amazing, mature, intelligent, respectful individuals who went to NU to debunk assumptions about BDSM, for educational purposes.
It's a shame that has gotten lost in all the craziness. - Reply to this comment
- If it was meant to be educational, it doesn't seem to have much educational value. That alone should be reason to can the professor. College education is too expensive these days to offer sham classes.
- Reply to this comment
- This little bit of "academic" philosophy indicates the absolute intellectual poverty being passed off today within "progressive" education. The Alfred Kinsey-ite "Professor" should be fired and all the students enrolled in this "University" might consider demanding their money back. This is not "education" but B.F. Skinnerian Psychological Conditioning. It is no wonder our society has decayed as it had done with such academically atrophied pseudo-science passed off with any semblance of honesty. It is as though to find a true fact seeking intellectually honest educator today is like searching for a diamond in a toilet. Looks like Zygmund Dobb's work "The Great Deceit" and Kilpatrick's "Why Johnny Can't Tell Right from Wrong" are worthy to all related to the above incodent. SRA
- Reply to this comment
- Who cares what these exhibitionists do in their own lives, but universities are meant to be a means to learn, move toward wisdom, and work on dignity. This is just the most recent example of how professors and sometimes administrations have degraded our (former) institutions of higher learning.
- Reply to this comment
- As an alumnus of Northwestern (class of '96), I applaud my alma mater for allowing frank & honest study of human sexuality in all of its forms. Professor Bailey, who I had as a professor, is not doing this to shock people. He's a serious academic studying an important part of human experience.
"Gross and weird?" Maybe to some. But you know what? You don't know what your friends, your neighbors, maybe people in your family, do in private with their sexual partners. Human experience is wider and more diverse, and honestly, probably more full of sexual kinks, than you might think just walking down the street.
And to the person calling Kroll & Marcus "lowlifes": shame on you. This is the twenty-first century, not the dark ages. You should respect other people's differences and applaud their bravery in assisting science.
Finally, I'm baffled as to why this post appears under a huge banner reading, "Crimesider." That in itself is shameful. No crime was committed here. Yellow journalism much, servants of Murdoch? - Reply to this comment
- As an alumnus of Northwestern (class of '96), I applaud my alma mater for allowing frank & honest study of human sexuality in all of its forms. Professor Bailey, who I had as a professor, is not doing this to shock people. He's a serious academic studying an important part of human experience.
"Gross and weird?" Maybe to some. But you know what? You don't know what your friends, your neighbors, maybe people in your family, do in private with their sexual partners. Human experience is wider and more diverse, and honestly, probably more full of sexual kinks, than you might think just walking down the street.
And to the person calling Kroll & Marcus "lowlifes": shame on you. This is the twenty-first century, not the dark ages. You should respect other people's differences and applaud their bravery in assisting science.
Finally, I'm baffled as to why this post appears under a huge banner reading, "Crimesider." That in itself is shameful. No crime was committed here. Yellow journalism much, servants of Murdoch? - Reply to this comment
- I wonder if Faith offered any of the male attendees the opportunity to learn how to operate the 'orgasm generator' on her. Or, would she have become the inhibited modest damsel then. Me thinks, probably so! I think Faith and her so-called fiance knew this stunt would generate publicity and would probably see huge ticket sales at their next gig. Her lowlife Fiancee I guess wanted to share his supposed sweetheart with the world. Maybe Faith and boyfriend should have saved this stunt for a frat party event, then the guys could have volunteered to use the 'orgasm generator' on her, along with the usual way of inducing a female orgasm in case the orgasm generator didn't do the trick.
- Reply to this comment
- Where is the bottom? How low will we go? I applaud the 500 students that left, if I'm reading right. You have a "right" to do so many things in this country, responsibility comes with those rights. If they study pediphilia will the teacher bring his child in and a sex offender and see what happens there?
- Reply to this comment
