Add a Comment
- Tell her to button her blouse..she and every other woman are inviting remarks like any maale would give. Her pans could be looser also!
- Reply to this comment
- I'm just another decadent Western guy -- you know the type . . . the gawker, the inappropriate toucher, the voyuer, the Peeping Tom, Mr. Smooth, the chest talker. A hairy armed, hairy assed, hairy knuckled, hairy backed, hairy chested, hairy eared, halding, hirsute, smell my own farts, (make you smell my own farts), plant a smelly, smell my own arm pits (Ah, the sweat smell of manhood), apeman. And as a jock (of course), I probably shouldn't be telling male secrets (out of the lockeroom, so to speak), to the women reading this, but I just got to tell you girls, a lady -- A Real Lady -- does not enter a mens' locker room. Period. This has been a huge jock played on women by male producers of these NFL TV shows. Sorry, but it's true.
And besides: Are you kidding me?
Even by today's overly tolerant standards (What are those one wonders.), she looks like a *****, she dresses like a *****, she acts like a ***** -- and she expects (demands) to be treated like a . . . lady.
Have we all lost our minds? Gimme a break. Never gonna happen. Women, you can pass all the laws you want to. Not going to happen.
This creature is a caricature of womanhood, a fraud that represents nothing except torqued up sexuality -- faked breasts, a faked ass, faked hair, a faked weight, a faked body -- a twisted version of what passes for beauty in a Western world gone absolutely mad. She's just another creature from the skanky lagoon, crying out "Baby, Baby, Baby" in the night. Yew! Yuck! Gag me!
Talk about being creeped out, try dancing close to woman when you are separated by enough silicone to pass for two Honda Accords parked outside. Yeah, that's a real turn on, girls.
This creature expects to be respected looking like a *****. Where is an Afghan soccer stadium and a Moslem extremist with an AK-47 when you need one? EWWW!
Ladies, please . . . what good is she for? Obviously, she's high maintenance. Do you really think that men think that somebody who looks like that is going to want to help them make dinner in a kitchen, at home, sharing a beer, exchanging the more poignant and sensitive details about how their respective weeks went, on a Friday night, and still call that fun? Do you think that you could take something that looks like that camping, on a 10-day canoe trip trip through the Adirondacks? Get real. Taking her grocery shopping probably seems like a trip to the wilds for someone who looks like that. She probably doesn't even know how to cook, and unless its something about wearing an apron and nothing else then forget about it. Her apartment probably looks like a pig's sty (if she even has one when she's not drifting from the bed, couch, or coach, of one worthy NFL player or another, night after night). She probably has no friends because she's so self absorbed. Do you think that something like that is going to be bothered with wanting to share a life with another human being? And she, like so many women like her today, are completely convinced that she's all that. Yeah, right. All that fakery needs to be maintained at a high cost. Who is going to pay for the up-keep on all that silicone and plastic surgery? Not this man. Who is going to pay for that nonsense in today's economy? Not this man. More to the point: who wants to lay on that? Well . . . maybe once or twice, just to see what all the fuss is about. No, not really. Sorry, for teasing you like that.
Do you really think that guys want to take something like that home to their mother? Not even if their mothers looked like her.
And women . . . if you think something like that is beautiful then you haven't been paying attention to all the men laughing behind her back. Even when the camera is pointed at her big ass it is laughing at her. And who is to know that in some cases the camera is being held by another women. - Reply to this comment
- I'm eagerly waiting for the day that women's bodies lose the hyper-sexualized stigma. For breasts to not be something that will drive a locker room full of men so wild that they forget themselves and appropriate ways of acting toward fellow... humans.
Fortunately we have gotten past being property & even have gotten permission to have a voice. Maybe one day we can have our bodies back, too. - Reply to this comment
- Did anyone happen to catch her this morning on the Today Show? Once again, she was dressed in a somewhat provocative manner, but they had the information bar (what shows the story title, temp, time, etc.) much higher than I have ever seen it to try and "cover her up" I am a woman and do not condone harrassment, etc., but if you're putting it out there like that, don't cry that you are being harrassed. Equal rights for women, yes, but I don't think they should be allowed in a men's LOCKER ROOM to cover a story...pleeeeezzzz!!
- Reply to this comment
- I agree with most everyone else. Female reporters, especially ones like Ines Sainz (model, Miss Spain, etc) should NEVER be allowed in a men's locker room. She got what was expected and should be glad it wasn't worse. Females don't belong in a male locker room - in high school, in college, in the pros. All this seems to be is media sensationalism. Real news must be slow or lacking.
- Reply to this comment
- I don't believe a "woman" should be treated this way. But she was not acting like a "woman" and a true "woman" would have respected the privacy of the men and NOT BE IN THEIR locker room in the first place. I don't think a woman has any business being in a men's locker room. You don't see men going into a woman's locker room. The women would scream "invasion of privacy". Well what about the men? They should have the same right. Why don't these players turn around and sue her for invasion of privacy and harrassment? Besides, I agree with all the other posts too. If she doesn't want supposed cat calls, etc, then why does she dress with her "fake" breasts hanging out? She claims she wasn't seductively dressed yet her blouse was unbuttoned below her cleavage. I say SHE is at fault here, not the players.
Then she complained because they were throwing her footballs on the side line when she was watching practice. What "guy" or TRUE football fan wouldn't LOVE THIS!!!! Seems to me like she planned this whole thing WELL BEFORE she even went out there just for the media attention. - Reply to this comment
- SEE THE DIFFERENCE?
THE INTERVIEW?
SHE HAS HER BREASTS ALL EXPOSED! A MINI SKIRT ON! BARELY COVERS HALF HER THIGH!
NOW LOOK AT THE INTERVIEWER!
LONG SKIRT TO HER KNEES AND NO BREAST SHOTS.
THIS IS PROSTITUTE VERSES PROFFESSIONAL REPORTER.
P.S. Her looker room incident, she also DID NOT bother to button ALL of the buttons on the shirt, she WON'T BE SUING SHE CAN'T!
LMFAO!!!
I would love to see that! Her dumb ass in court shirt NOT buttoned up all the way!
Seriously all of the Jets players in the looker room need to sue her for exposing her **** aka breasts her sexual objects that she clearly has a need to show off 100% of the time. Jets players you have lots of money take this wh0re to court and sue her for exposing herself to you in your locker room! - Reply to this comment
- REPORTS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN THE LOCKER ROOM AT ANY TIME.
- Reply to this comment
- are people out of your mind to give this woman this time and space in the news ? she sits on the set with a breast just about falling out of her shirt and wants us to believe she is a professional, is she in the profession of suduction? DONT YOU DRESS A CERTAIN WAY FOR YOUR PROFESSION? I GUESS WAS SLOW TODAY?
- Reply to this comment
- Seems that my original comment isn't making the cut here. Not due to the fact that I was improper in my choice of wording, but my accusation of CBS being "Liberal" media. My wording was tasteful given the situation.
My comments were more tasteful than several of the others that have been allowed. If you don't want to be labeled as "Liberal Media", then stop acting like it. Censorship at it's best. - Reply to this comment
