"He is the one that brings them onstage on a regular basis and encourages them to make complimentary statements about him."
Posted by AJMarine111 at 07:07 PM : Feb 06, 2009
Yeah, I disagree with him doing that. They shouldn''t be bringing the kids on stage and they shouldn''t be making any statements at all. As far as I''m concerned we have seen way too much of those kids.
The same with Palin''s kids. She should not have been bring them onstage with her.
I agree! this is all happening because of Republican Policies. Which time after time never work! Seems the Dems always are stuck fixing the economy after the fact. Just look at the History.Republicans equals war, giant deficits,Tax shifts to the Middle Class,And big time Corruption( Dems aren''''t perfect either,but there is less thier seems). Also It seems all republicans do the blame on everone else except them even when it is their policies which they put in power.Who was in Power the last eight years? Looks like they will never learn to take responsibilities for thier own actions.Now its time to fix it and they want no part in what they did. Time to abolish the Republican Party as a whole.
I''''m not so sure. They may for awhile, but I think it''''s just a matter of time.
Posted by erasmus606 at 06:48 PM : Feb 06, 2009
You could be partly right, I remember the Chelsea jokes, and the talk about the Bush twins, but I still don''t think the Obama girls will be picked on that much.
I did run across something that kinda says it like it is. Presidents will run their kids out there for photo ops and have them say cute things to the press when they want too, but when the press says something they don''t like, they say "My children should be off limits".
This the paragraph that I was paraphrasing.
"Obama asks that his children be off limits. I agree, but he seems to want it both ways. He is the one that brings them onstage on a regular basis and encourages them to make complimentary statements about him. He even had them interviewed by a national reporter a couple weeks ago. His bloggers are also all over this webpage making indescent statements about Palins''s child."
Maybe Michelle (SP) too, but they will leave the girls alone.
Posted by AJMarine111 at 06:34 PM : Feb 06, 2009
I''m not so sure. They may for awhile, but I think it''s just a matter of time. Actually it''s the "people" that will start tearing them down. Look at poor Chelsea Clinton. It wasn''t just the media, the people were calling her ugly. How can they do that to a child? People like to build things up, but eventually they will tear it back down.
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Reply to Comment The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Like that is any different from the reality the average American must accept, post-Patriot Act?
Posted by erasmus606 at 07:35 PM : Feb 06, 2009
No she shouldn''t have. Especially if she didn''t want people saying things about them.
People were brutal with Sarah and her kids.
I thought Bush said they would not only be clean as a whistle, but that they would be above reproach. The best laid plans of mice and men.........
Claude Allen, White House
Eric Andell, U.S. Department of Education
Margaret Burnette, Food and Drug Administration
Lester Crawford, Food and Drug Administration
Lurita Doan, General Services Administration
Brian Doyle, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Darleen Druyun, U.S. Air Force
Frank Figueroa, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, Central Intelligence Agency
J. Steven Griles, U.S. Department of the Interior
Andrea Grimsley, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Donald Keyser, U.S. Department of State
John Korsmo, Federal Housing Finance Board
Kevin Marlowe, U.S. Department of Defense
Jose Miranda, Broadcasting Board of Governors
William Myers, U.S. Department of Interior
Janet Rehnquist, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
David Safavian, White House and General Services Administration
Robert Schofield, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Thomas Scully, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
David Smith, Department of Interior
Jeffrey Stayton, U.S. Department of the Army
Robert Stein, Coalition Provisional Authority
Roger Stillwell, U.S. Department of the Interior
Kenneth Tomlinson, Corporation for Public Broadcasting
Posted by AJMarine111 at 07:07 PM : Feb 06, 2009
Yeah, I disagree with him doing that. They shouldn''t be bringing the kids on stage and they shouldn''t be making any statements at all. As far as I''m concerned we have seen way too much of those kids.
The same with Palin''s kids. She should not have been bring them onstage with her.
Posted by erasmus606 at 06:55 PM : Feb 06, 2009
ALL races have to many racists.
Maybe now we can move past that.
I''''m not so sure. They may for awhile, but I think it''''s just a matter of time.
Posted by erasmus606 at 06:48 PM : Feb 06, 2009
You could be partly right, I remember the Chelsea jokes, and the talk about the Bush twins, but I still don''t think the Obama girls will be picked on that much.
I did run across something that kinda says it like it is. Presidents will run their kids out there for photo ops and have them say cute things to the press when they want too, but when the press says something they don''t like, they say "My children should be off limits".
This the paragraph that I was paraphrasing.
"Obama asks that his children be off limits. I agree, but he seems to want it both ways. He is the one that brings them onstage on a regular basis and encourages them to make complimentary statements about him. He even had them interviewed by a national reporter a couple weeks ago. His bloggers are also all over this webpage making indescent statements about Palins''s child."
Posted by AJMarine111 at 06:27 PM : Feb 06, 2009
I think that right now, he''s coming down off a "high". And who could blame him? He''s the first black President! That means something!
Of course it also means something to the racists and that is where part of the problem is.
Posted by AJMarine111 at 06:34 PM : Feb 06, 2009
I''m not so sure. They may for awhile, but I think it''s just a matter of time. Actually it''s the "people" that will start tearing them down. Look at poor Chelsea Clinton. It wasn''t just the media, the people were calling her ugly. How can they do that to a child? People like to build things up, but eventually they will tear it back down.
And it won''''t be just Obama, it will be his wife and those precious little girls, too.
Posted by erasmus606 at 06:25 PM : Feb 06, 2009
Maybe Michelle (SP) too, but they will leave the girls alone.