Comments on: Obama Ends Stem Cell Research Ban
President Reverses Bush's Restrictions, Says Administration "Will Vigorously Support Scientists Who Pursue This Research"
- Cause:
I don't want stem cell research used to search for a cure for my diabetes.
Posted by toooldtovote at 11:17 PM : Mar 9, 2009
And effect:
(CNN) -- America is a less Christian nation than it was 20 years ago, and Christianity is not losing out to other religions, but primarily to a rejection of religion altogether, a survey published Monday found.
More and more Americans are figuring out that being a dogma drone turns you into a blathering idiot. - Reply to this comment
- hungry1968-15: My question is would he have wanted innnocent unborn babies to destroyed to save his life? I doubt it!
Posted by ladypirate2 at 10:54 PM : Mar 9, 2009
The "canned" obfuscation of the fundamental.
Calling a frozen clump of cells an "unborn" baby.
A baby isn't a baby UNTIL it's born, until then it's a zygote, embryo, or fetus, depending on it's stage of development.
Try getting a SSN for your "baby" before it's born...... - Reply to this comment
- It's clear all they're seeking is attention to their religious agenda, and not the benefit of humanity.
Posted by PhilistineTheArtLover at 1:17 AM : Mar 10, 2009
Sure you're right.
Fundamentalists don't protest the disposal of these unused IVF embryos...they only protest something gg\ood coming from them.
Shows you how much they use their gourd.... - Reply to this comment
- The United States is always shooting itself in the foot, creating advanced technology and then passing Laws preventing its use. Then foreign nations step in and pick up the technology, implement it and sell it back to us! That is the dumbest thing I ever heard of, its just plain stupid. The U.S. is not operating in a vacuum, other nations will implement our ideas if we won't and Americans will travel overseas to take advantage of it making others rich and advancing their technology, or our abandoned technology! The U.S. is 8 years behind, time to catch up, good job Pres. Obama, banning this technology was stupid to begin with. I understand the arguments, I believe life begins at a humans first breath of air, not before! Life began for Adam when God breathed life into Adam, not before, not while Adam was created and still lying there on the ground, life began when Adam took his first breath from Gods, its an important distinction and the arguments are rooted in when life begins.
- Reply to this comment
- I may approve of someone using stem cell research to find a cure for harpoot. Whatever the hell that is.
- Reply to this comment
- "I don't want stem cell research used to search for a cure for my diabetes.
Posted by toooldtovote"
Should a cure be found thru this research no one will hold a gun to your head and force you to use the cure. Feel free to carry on as you are. - Reply to this comment
- I don't want stem cell research used to search for a cure for my diabetes.
- Reply to this comment
- hungry1968-15: My question is would he have wanted innnocent unborn babies to destroyed to save his life? I doubt it!
- Reply to this comment
- bigsk8fan: Nancy Reagan might think Obama is making the right decision but I want to remind you that her husband was very pro-life! I wonder what he would have thought about this?
Posted by ladypirate2 at 9:15 PM : Mar 9, 2009
How funny is it that you worry what Reagan would think about this, when the stem cell research could very well have eliminated his dementia back in 1981, and could have prolonged his life even longer!! - Reply to this comment
- quickly101: You are so right!
- Reply to this comment
- bigsk8fan: Nancy Reagan might think Obama is making the right decision but I want to remind you that her husband was very pro-life! I wonder what he would have thought about this?
- Reply to this comment
- I agree with all of you. Nice to see all of you this fine, fine evening!!
Woohoo!!
Posted by slownewsday2009 at 8:39 PM : Mar 9, 2009
It's been quite a day, indeed.
FYI, rowdy has been saying for days that you, I and about a bazillion other people are all the same person speaking with himself.
Have you seen any of that hooey? - Reply to this comment
- If we implement the changes recommended by those who do accept it as fact, there will be suffering of a different sort.
The real question is which woudl be worse?
Posted by formrusmcsgt at 7:54 PM............
What sorts of suffering are you refering to?
Posted by irishwench-2009 at 8:17 PM : Mar 9, 2009
Well, the list is long but we're talking about less efficient refrigerants, for example which will make air conditioning more expensive and less attainable.
These refrigerants and their costs will also driv up production and transport costs and the cost will be passed along as always.
And that's just discussing refigerants.
Global warming measures will be expensive to implement.
I'm not saying that they should not be, only that they will be costly in many ways. - Reply to this comment
- 'President Barack Obama said Monday he is allowing federal taxpayer dollars to fund significantly broader research on embryonic stem cells because "medical miracles do not happen simply by accident," and promised his administration would make up for the ground lost under his predecessor."
"President Barack Obama has ordered a review of his predecessor's so-called signing statements, which often told officials how to implement laws."
"(CNN) -- America is a less Christian nation than it was 20 years ago, and Christianity is not losing out to other religions, but primarily to a rejection of religion altogether, a survey published Monday found."
It a great day to be an American. - Reply to this comment
- It's been quite a good day for news, in my perspective.
Stem cells are back as an option, signing statements of Dubya are being reviewed and a study showing fewer and fewer Americans claiming to believe in dogma.
A great day indeed..... - Reply to this comment
- Global warming has turned into a religion and if you speak question it, you are thought of as a Heretic.
Posted by ajmarine2 at 6:50 PM : Mar 9, 2009
Semper Fi, AJ.
Global warming is one of those issues that seem to leave very little ground.
There are those convinced by the science to date and there are other who completely disregard it.
If those who disregard it are wrong we do nothing, we will all suffer.
If we implement the changes recommended by those who do accept it as fact, there will be suffering of a different sort.
The real question is which woudl be worse? - Reply to this comment
- Posted by melchg at 7:31 PM : Mar 9, 2009
I must go melchg, ..............have a good night. - Reply to this comment
- Why are we worrying about green house gasses and global warming. With the economy in the drink and no chance of getting out of it, the problem is solved. The new administration is doing a good job at keeping it down.
- Reply to this comment
- They have been questioning it for decades......all the while science and technologies have only improved. There is proof out there that it is happening, the only questions that really should have any validity is how much and how fast.
Posted by melchg
................or is it really caused by man or is it the work of the Sun and natural occurring things on Earth.
I leave in Ohio and once we had the Glaciers that carved out the Great Lakes right where I now live.
They melted and retreated back into Canada a long time before man could have caused it. - Reply to this comment
- Stem Cell research has never been restricted. Only taxpayers did not have to pay for it.
- Reply to this comment






