Yes, Obama continued Bush tax cuts. He's compromised on other issues as well. He's used Romney's ideas for reform (which even FORBES magazine pointed out). So, *what if* his goal was to use his opponents ideology as means to point out it doesn't work? And I've posted links to these issues plenty of times in the past, so if you're planning on saying "cite sources", I'll preemptively say "Go find my previous responses to you or others" as I've posted them too many times to care for.
I could probably nitpick that article as well, but the bulk of it rings true. The few areas I might nitpick could just as easily be addressed down the road.
Either way, this will be an interesting upcoming 5 months, indeed...
I agree, fascism is what happens when capitalism in not controlled and regulated. You get out of control vulture capitalists like Mitler Robmee who are actually proud of their rape and pillage of the common folk. And a lot of real stupid idiots put these greedy morons like Romney on a pedestal like some kind of fascist hero. Unbelievable!
I still find it very interesting that the right wingers actually think they have an equal point of view after all their ideas and programs have been a complete failure for so, so long. And they act as if the sane people on the progressive side don't know. It's unbelievable.
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Reply to Comment The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Why does it sound like something a Hobbit might use?? "Look out! The bad guys are coming! Throw a cowpie of distortion!"
Yes, Obama continued Bush tax cuts. He's compromised on other issues as well. He's used Romney's ideas for reform (which even FORBES magazine pointed out). So, *what if* his goal was to use his opponents ideology as means to point out it doesn't work? And I've posted links to these issues plenty of times in the past, so if you're planning on saying "cite sources", I'll preemptively say "Go find my previous responses to you or others" as I've posted them too many times to care for.
I could probably nitpick that article as well, but the bulk of it rings true. The few areas I might nitpick could just as easily be addressed down the road.
Either way, this will be an interesting upcoming 5 months, indeed...
---
Then that would fit Einstein's definition of the word "insanity".
----
That wasn't my point - at all.
I'll take my English language definitions from Webster, thank you.
----
Well, that certainly explains your ignorance.
Webster's does not replace scholarly texts on politics, obwan. Try getting your POLITICAL definitions from a better source than Websters.
I have no idea with sevenlucky7 could have said to get booted - he was behaving himself just fine... maybe he was going nuts on some other article.
"ROMNEY - When Obama Just Isn't Liberal Enough for You"
Forward is much better then backward, of course you on the right don't think so.