24 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Hyper_Dude says:
Oneslow: If he had nothing to do with the improvement, would you agree then that he has nothing to do with how bad the numbers were then? Can't have it both ways. Or is your argument that he's responsible for the bad, not nothing of the good?

If you look at historical unemployment, it's clear to any objective person that unemployment cratered before and during the first few months of Obama's presidency. They've only gotten better since.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ProgressNow says:
GOP says it's not enough.
----


Yes...so let's pass the President's Jobs bill in its entirety!!!!!
reply
retm-w replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
boughtpaidfor

It's the republicans that don't want jobs, they cringe at every bluecoller job that is created. Of course it would be below a republican to work a blue collar job.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
oneslownewsday1 says:
Why is he touting it? He had noting to do with it and in reality there is nothing to tout.
Unempolyment is still at 8.3 and really higher. The jobs created were either low paying and part time ones.
I was wondering how long that incompetent jackass would take try and take credit for these pathetic unemployment numbers.
reply
retm-w replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Just the kind of jobs republicans like for the middleclass, puts the U.S. worker in the same catagory as a chinese worker.
WHAT-IS-HE-SMOKING replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well since he first took office, he was blamed for the unemployment numbers but now that things are turning around he can't take credit for it?
I was wondering how long it would take for an incompetent jackass to make a comment that the 233K jobs that the people got was not worth anything.
2/2