Comments on: Sessions "Flabbergasted" by Sotomayor's Philosophy
Add a Comment See all 77 Comments
- Why is it ok for a conservative justice to have an agenda but not a libeal. Justice Roberts decides in favor of the white power base all the time and Alito is a border line faschist.
- Reply to this comment
- La Raza does not Burn Crosses in front of peoples homes.
It is a Community organisation going back to the Civil rights movement.
They do allot of good in their Communities.
Comparing it to the KKK shows absoulute Ignorance. - Reply to this comment
- Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Judge Sotomayor first appointed to the United States District Court by a Republican President, I believe it was the first of the Bush morons. Now, a Republican Senator has the gall to say this woman is not fit to be a Supreme Court Justice, when his party placed her in the judicial system. This is just more Republican hypocrisy, and I hope everyone is sick of it. In the 2010 elections, we need to destroy the G.O.P. once and for all. These morons are not fit to be citizens of the United States.
- Reply to this comment
- That post is so incoherent, it's scary.
But it sounds like you're cheering for some racist bigot to "knock sense" into the other justices on the Supreme Court.
You actually approve of her using physical violence to force your partisan racist bigotry on the highest court in the lane???? - Reply to this comment
- Next time 'round vote Libertarian.
- Reply to this comment
- Why do we use the Blindfolded lady with the scales of justice as our symbal?
-------------------
Absolutely right. Impartial and equal justice is the foundation of our justice system. BTW, it was the principal used by the civil rights movement too.
Now the loony left wants to toss all that out to get their racist bigot seated on the Supremem Court.
It is truly shocking and disturbing that the loony left has grown so utterly immoral and corrupt, all in blind pursuit of their cynical partisan political agenda. - Reply to this comment
- well regardless of your view she is anything but mainstream
- Reply to this comment
- They are not robots, they are HUMAN beings.
------------
Shocking. It's just astonishing how quickly the loony left will discard the principle of impartial, equal justice, in their mad dash to pursue their cynical partisan political agenda.
The Democrats have already lead the way into the new dark ages by handing $50 billion of our money to a big greedy company like GM during the worst recession since 1940. They have already tipped their hand with Madoff, another Democrat and the perpetrator of the biggest financial fraud in history.
We are headed for a new Dark Ages, thanks to these cynical Democrats on the loony left. - Reply to this comment
- y IThoughtItWasFunnyNOPE July 12, 2009 10:56 AM PDT
Not to mention that the SCOTUS has overturned 81% now of her racist unconstitutional cases they've heard...
if YOU THINK THEY MADE A JUSTIFIABLE ruling they did that to embarrass her before her confirmation, every ruling this supreme court makes is political. Not with standing leaning with a republican view, so when was the last time a republican had a thought let alone a mind, prove that 81%. I know that is propaganda, the ABA has approved her that is good enough for me.The supreme court has a hard time with the rule of law maybe she will knock some sense into them - Reply to this comment
- Opposition to Sotomayer may well run along party lines. If so, that is why such opposition will fail. Pitty.
Anyone who has read as many as 3 of my posts would surely observe that I am very liberal. Yet I find Sotomayer to among the most unqualified to be a judge of any kind, especially where Constitutional law is concerned.
By definition, a judge *must* not allow personal bias to ever play a role in making legal decisions. That she admits to doing that very thing ought to automatically disqualify her from consideration. - Reply to this comment