Add a Comment See all 65 Comments
by specialty8 May 30, 2009 7:48 AM EDT
Seems she has better judgement than the winners Obama has picked so far. 5 tax crooks.
Reply to this comment
by lordmi May 30, 2009 7:11 AM EDT
who is this Liz to judge and even to be listened to?
I do not care what does she say - she has no authority, no reputation, etc.
She is NOTHING.
leave her in silence and move on - we have more important things to do than pay attention at "cheneys" - any kind of them.
Enough is enough
Reply to this comment
by joule18 May 30, 2009 6:45 AM EDT
I just love it when you leftist get your panties in a twist. LOL!
Reply to this comment
by joule18 May 30, 2009 6:42 AM EDT
We are being played for fools while those in Congress try to repeal the term limits on Presidents:

HJ 5 IH

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. J. RES. 5

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 6, 2009

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

?Article--

?The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.?.
Reply to this comment
by lehnahund May 30, 2009 6:19 AM EDT
seeing it from outside the US I find the whole cheney family troubling and that is a soft word. I have to restrain myself. lets say it that way, I wouldn´t by a second hand car off them.

they are still holding on to the race unjustices of the past, but more in a larmoyant reverse gear. giving way to a more colorblind society inch by inch. but never by themselves.

the side which was the upper side für hundreds of years is losing influence. that is always harder to handle than gaining influence.

all that needs time.
Reply to this comment
by nearl451 May 30, 2009 3:48 AM EDT
No this is LIZ the neo-neocon, not Mary.
Reply to this comment
by nearl451 May 30, 2009 3:47 AM EDT
The Cheney Family finds the US Constituion "Troubling".

NEWSFLASH.

YAAAAWWWN.
Reply to this comment
by nofoolling May 29, 2009 10:56 PM EDT
Considering these comments in the article above come from a woman aiding and abetting one of the biggest terrorist threats the world has ever known in her murderous father,

it ain't worth the breath it took to say.

Crawl back in the same hole your genocidal dad crawled out of.
Reply to this comment
by orsands May 29, 2009 8:28 PM EDT
Of all the people to give a platform about Sotomayor's appropriateness for the bench -CBS chooses Cheney's daughter? Excuse me? Why not also give us a take on what your butcher thinks? Or perhaps your neighbor's third cousin would also like to weigh in?
Liz Cheney only graduated from law school in 1996. And a mere six years later daddy had her named Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs. Obviously for her-it has paid off nicely to have had daddy's connections. Just one more appointee of Bush & Cheney for a position in which the person was grossly unqualified and for which there were far more better and experienced candidates.
So now this mouthpiece for daddy is suddenly the new brain trust when it comes to discussing a Supreme Court nominee? Aren't there some law school professors or true legal scholars you could have contacted? It appears CBS is far more interested in promoting the viewpoint of conservatives and the GOP than providing newsworthy articles.
If she really wants to read something 'troubling'- let us suggest she start with any number of statements made by her sociopathic father over the last eight years.
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage May 29, 2009 8:27 PM EDT
What I find "troubling" is that so many members of politicians families, get so much air time on T.V. and press time in the papers to act as propagandists for the extremist views that they actually represent!

As if, those extremist views are not ALREADY over represented at large! Which, they ARE!!
Reply to this comment
See all 65 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Tempers Flare In Climate Change Flap

    (720 recent comments)

HOTSHEET ON TWITTER