Comments on: Liberals Concerned About Sotomayor's Abortion Views

[mrzerato]

I believe that she may not be pro choice. The first indication is he religion. Second is her support of the Bush policy. I do not think though she would overthrow the constitution. She believes in past decisions of the court

[ToolMangler1]

Hmmmm I expected to be shot out of the saddle by now. What gives?

[Walking_Talking_GOO]

Since THEY are the medical professionals, they would know better than any of us "non-professionals" would.

Since most won't perform an abortion after 26 weeks, then I would say that is the cut off for the decision.

Again, I'm no professional, so I defer to those that are.
Posted by hungry1968-15

No HUNGRYDUMMY -- Doctors do not determine who is a baby and a living human being. GOD determines that.

Let me ask you this: Can two homosexuals create a living human being? Then, why support it? You DUMMY....

[hungry1968-15]

hungry1968-15

LOL! Glad you could join in. Can you explain why in one post your fellow liberal comrade gravyboat69 claimed that a "fetus isn't a person" then in his next post he claimed it is a baby?

Come on....dig into that deep liberal wisdom of yours, in that cloud of grayness, and give a clear answer from out of the grayness...
Posted by CBS_bans_Conservatives at 1:31 PM : May 28, 2009







Maybe he mispoke, maybe he's wrong, maybe YOU'RE wrong.

I didn't see the comments, I don't speak for gravy, and I don't pretend to speak for gravy.

My comments on the matter can be found at 1:28.

[ToolMangler1]

(1) Define: Human
(2) Determine: The beginning of the 'State of being Human'
(3) Determine: The end of the 'State of being Human'.


I have googled exstensivly for the definition of 'Human' and here is the 'gist' of my findings,

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/human
"Main Entry: hu·man
Pronunciation:\?hyü-m?n, ?yü-\
Function:adjective
Etymology:Middle English humain, from Anglo-French, from Latin humanus; akin to Latin **** human being ? more at homage
Date:14th century
1: of, relating to, or characteristic of humans
2: consisting of humans
3 a: having human form or attributes b: susceptible to or representative of the sympathies and frailties of human nature <such an inconsistency is very human".


Now, what I want is for some academically gifted "Biped" to give me a clear answer. "DEFINE: HUMAN". Dont give some song and dance about characteristics etc, etc.
Once that has been done, then we might see clearly at what point a sperm and egg combo becomes a "Human".

[mattcat25]

The Majority of Americans really don't care about this issue, it's a private personal choice. Republicans continue to exploit susceptible supporters in effort to promote their skewed political agenda.

[jonesjep]

Why worry Libs. You know she is all for killing babies. She is a Lib. You know Libs have no interest in personal responsibility.

[mattcat25]

So which is it lib? Are liberals the only ones qualified to make "determinations"? Is this what you're saying?
Posted by CBS_bans_Conservatives at 1:19 PM : May 28,

No, a woman, a woman that has given birth, or a currently expectant woman would be the one to ask.

[hungry1968-15]

Answer the question liberal. Your liberal friends seem to think THEY had the right to make the determination, as in one post they called it a "fetus" and in the next they called it a "baby".

So which is it lib? Are liberals the only ones qualified to make "determinations"? Is this what you're saying?
Posted by CBS_bans_Conservatives at 1:19 PM : May 28, 2009





I leave it to the doctors.

Since THEY are the medical professionals, they would know better than any of us "non-professionals" would.

Since most won't perform an abortion after 26 weeks, then I would say that is the cut off for the decision.

Again, I'm no professional, so I defer to those that are.

[mattcat25]

Nope. Now answer the question:

Is it a fetus or a baby? Your liberal friends on here can't seem to make up their minds.
Posted by CBS_bans_Conservatives at 1:11 PM : May 28,

You are not pregnant, hence you have no business making this determination Comrade.

[mattcat25]

Republicans claim to be the Party of Personal Freedoms with less Governmental Intervention or "Socialism" as they have vilified.

Why are the Republican Conservatives coveting Governmental Control "Socialization" and Regulation of a WOMAN?s freedom of choice?

[mattcat25]

A classic liberal tactic when you've lost an argument is to completely change the subject, as you've done. Stick to the subject lib.

Is the baby a Baby or is it a "fetus"? Your liberal friends on here can't seem to give a clear answer.
Posted by CBS_bans_Conservatives at 1:08 PM : May 28,


Are you pregnant?

[gravyboat69]

Can't converse with someone who just wants to repeat the same BS all day.
Posted by gravyboat69
LOL!

The translation: "I can't admit that in one post I said a fetus "is not a person" then in my next post I claimed it is a baby."
Posted by CBS_bans_Conservatives

You know I didn't say that. lmao

Later liar.

[mattcat25]

Why are Republicans always spouting out in a very grotesque manner on this subject, all in effort to promote and gain support for thier OIL based Conservative Agenda?

What does a person's personal freedom of choice have to do with OIL? and the assault on the American Working Class?

[gravyboat69]

I am disappointed that CBS chooses "pro-abortion rights" and "anti-abortion rights" to address the issue. Why not, for example "anti-unborn-person rights" and "pro-unborn-person rights"? It's just as biased, of course.......
Posted by blazercoach1

lmao

Later Evangelical Rt Wingers.

[gravyboat69]

and how you attempt to FORCE your beliefs on others.
Posted by gravyboat69

Aaaaah the old playing the "victim" role tactic that so many atheists use.

Now can you tell me, is the baby a "baby" or is it a "fetus" in the womb?

Your posts contradicted each other.

Make up your mind.
Posted by CBS_bans_Conservatives

Nah, you're just to wrapped up in your copy n paste game to undersand them.

Can't converse with someone who just wants to repeat the same BS all day.

[blazercoach1]

I am disappointed that CBS chooses "pro-abortion rights" and "anti-abortion rights" to address the issue. Why not, for example "anti-unborn-person rights" and "pro-unborn-person rights"? It's just as biased, of course.......

[gravyboat69]

Kill an unborn baby...it's ok.
Kill a home invader with a sawed off shotgun...it's not ok.
Posted by BerkeleyShirtLifter

Keep abortion legal and safe. Respect a woman's/familie's choice to govern their own lives.

Kill every MF that attempts a home invasion.

[gravyboat69]

gravyboat69, quit mocking the faith of our foundingfathers. If not for their wisdom, courage, and honor, you wouldn't be privileged to live in America now. They had a strong faith in God.
Posted by CBS_bans_Conservatives

Where have I mocked anyone's ,"faith"?

And their faith isn't the issue here, it's yours, and how you attempt to FORCE your beliefs on others.

[gravyboat69]

To that end, your mornic example is simple. Mom WANTED HER BABY BUT IT WAS TAKEN AWAY FROM HER.

You guys are pathetic.
Posted by gravyboat69 at 12:45 PM : May 28, 2009

A fetus isn't a person yet.
posted by gravyboat69 at 12:39 PM : May 28, 2009


Hmmm...seems that liberal wisdom has you a little confused. LOL
Posted by CBS_bans_Conservatives

I'm not a liberal.

And you're the one who is confused.