Comments on: U.S. House Approves Gun Rights Bill
Add a Comment See all 86 Comments
- Posted by gunownerdan at 6:58 AM : May 21, 2009
I'm sure that Mr. Washington was also not nearly as belligerent as this idiot. Nor was he simply worried that someone was going to take his gun. You're trying to justify owning a gun with a different time and different era justification. It won't work, it can't work, because we are not being governed by another country across the sea. If you're going to use try to justify... at least choose something that MIGHT have a relation to present day. You know, like Al Qaeda. - Reply to this comment
- It is foolish to rely on the authorities for protection, especially in national parks where the nearest ranger can be many miles away. In many parks aroudn America there are even aligators, bears, wolves, mountain lions, buffalo, rattle snakes, anacondas, and many other dangerous animals that can and have killed people.
Posted by gunownerdan
Gee, I regularly ride my bicycle into areas that have rattlesnakes, coyote and mountain lions. No gun, just me and my bike. It must be terrible to live in such fear. I wonder how you people are able to even climb out of bed everyday. - Reply to this comment
- you, sir, qualify as a terrorist.
Posted by at 6:54 AM : May 21, 2009
George Washington was an Extremist Terrorist....
According to the King of England. - Reply to this comment
- Rob me of my Rights or my Property and I will feel ZERO remorse killing you. Just think you could become another statistic in gun deaths. Won't you give your life to the cause and boost the numbers, please :)
Posted by Fedup_w_all_pols at 6:25 AM : May 21, 2009
This is exactly the sentiment of people who should have ABSOLUTELY NO access to any kind of deadly weapon. If you have no remorse for killing just because someone disagrees with you... you might as well declare jihad. You're no better than a terrorist. Fear and intimidation... that is what terrorists use... and you, sir, qualify as a terrorist. - Reply to this comment
- It is foolish to rely on the authorities for protection, especially in national parks where the nearest ranger can be many miles away. In many parks aroudn America there are even aligators, bears, wolves, mountain lions, buffalo, rattle snakes, anacondas, and many other dangerous animals that can and have killed people.
Some people value their lives enough to be able to protect themselves just in case something bad happens. These people are a threat to no one but violent criminals and other dangerous animals.
If a man with a gun permit can carry his weapon everywhere else in his state, why not at a park? - Reply to this comment
- PROOF THAT GUN CONTROL HAS FAILED:
Its supporters are still alive! - Reply to this comment
- According to the DOJ(Department Of Justice) guns are used in self defense over 80,000 times per year in America(that's hundreds of times per day!) and a large majority of the time not a single shot is fired and no one gets hurt.
Criminals will always prefer defenseless victims! - Reply to this comment
- How does it feel to have something totally irrelavant to the credit cards shoved into a bill that no one read and gets passed? GENUIS.. Dems have been doing this crap for years so why not do it to put some tetth back into our rights. All you anti gun folks will have your day when push comes to shove all you will be doing is shoving people with guns and I don't have to tell you how that is going to end. But when it is over there won't be any debate about gun control because those with the guns will be in control make no mistake. Rob me of my Rights or my Property and I will feel ZERO remorse killing you. Just think you could become another statistic in gun deaths. Won't you give your life to the cause and boost the numbers, please :)
Posted by Fedup_w_all_pols
Yeah, yeah, David Koresh made the same hollow threats, the problem is he brought a gun to a tank fight. - Reply to this comment
- "enjoylife63" suggested "dagranny" change their name. A better suggestion is for "dagranny" to move to Russia. She won't have to worry about dealing with "rights" there - there are none.
- Reply to this comment
- enjoylife63: I think you need to change your name.
- Reply to this comment
- You sent our men and women off to fight and die in a needless war and talked about supporting our troops but then you dropped them in the grease . . .
Morals and ethics? Get a clue.
Posted by woodjd42 at 2:05 AM
+++++++++++++++++++++
You're referring to Obama here, right?
Posted by despido
You must be in a coma!!! Either that or you just plain stupid!!! - Reply to this comment
- Lots of dem congressman senators voted this in. The libs must be going crazy. LOL.
Posted by Socialization
.
I 'm not ecstatic about it, if however it is one more issue the Democrats can take away from the GOP and help hasten their extinction, then it is a trade off I am willing to make. - Reply to this comment
- Our children are dying, the sky is falling, everybody run for your lives, we're all going to be killed!
A-HUMAN-RIGHT . com - Reply to this comment
- With over 4,000,000 members the NRA(NRA.org) is the largest civil-rights group in the world. There are over 60,000,000 gun owners in America and over 5,000,000 of them already legally carry concealed weapons basically everywhere they go. Why not at a park?
Parks are not crime-free. Self defense is everyone's right plus there are also many parks in America with dangerous wild animals that can kill people. - Reply to this comment
- truth_police "Dems lack honesty"? I am amazed that even an ignorant neo-con would have the nerve to say that after all the repeated evidence of the total lack of honesty of the Bush administration. Or maybe neo-cons are just far too stupid to understand that the country was sold to Haliburton under the guise of an ill-conceived and illegal war.
- Reply to this comment
- What no one seems to want, either pro- or anti-gun is a rational policy of licensing gun owners. You have to have a license to drive a car or fly a plane, even if you own neither. But you must prove competence and knowledge to do either.
Why not a similar license to buy a firearm? You would have to study, prove your knowledge and qualifications, and then, if you chose, you could purchase a gun.
Naturally, this will not keep criminals from owning guns, but nothing we can do can stop that. But a licensing plan will permit responsible, trained people to legally own firearms and the training might reduce firearms accidents like vice-presidents shooting their lawyers. Or was that an accident? LOL - Reply to this comment
- "The principle of self-defense, even involving weapons and bloodshed, has never been condemned, even by Gandhi..."
-- Martin Luther King, Jr
A-HUMAN-RIGHT . com
"It is better to have a gun in the hand than a cop on the phone because when seconds count the police are only minutes away." - Reply to this comment
- You sent our men and women off to fight and die in a needless war and talked about supporting our troops but then you dropped them in the grease . . .
Morals and ethics? Get a clue.
Posted by woodjd42 at 2:05 AM
+++++++++++++++++++++
You're referring to Obama here, right? - Reply to this comment
- teaches the safety,fun and usefulness of owning a gun.
Posted by noirviolette
teaches the safety fun and usefulness of KILLING things. Luvverly. - Reply to this comment
- Thats great but you still cant buy ammunition...go try!
- Reply to this comment
