Add a Comment See all 351 Comments
by repo_man_08 February 9, 2009 12:11 AM EST
GOP spend the money in foreign countries, like that ******** Iraq to benefit their buddies in Halliburton.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by jerr11 at 09:09 PM : Feb 08, 2009

So are you saying the Iraq war spending created jobs IN IRAQ????

WHERE DID ALL THOSE JOBS GO???
Reply to this comment
by promaclaura February 9, 2009 12:11 AM EST
It''s very interesting, the back and forth of what each party "did" to hurt this country. The "stimulus" is very one-sided, so if it fails we''ll definitely know who''s at fault.
Reply to this comment
by notfooled February 9, 2009 12:10 AM EST
"In the interest of full disclosure, that''s the way the Bush administration [operated] when we Republicans were in charge."

Ha ha ha ha ha lmao.

Still lying and still trying the same old sleazy tactics.

Thats why you didn''t get elected McSame.

And there was never any "full disclosure" with the Bush/Cheney crime syndicate.
Reply to this comment
by repo_man_08 February 9, 2009 12:10 AM EST
And tell me, did Bush even make an ATTEMPT at fixing any of those problems? Or was he too busy starting wars?:)




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by erasmus606 at 09:08 PM : Feb 08, 2009

Who''s worse - the one who failed to fix the problems, or the one who CAUSED them??????

Reply to this comment
by jerr11 February 9, 2009 12:09 AM EST
Yeah the old geezer is right.

The dems love to spend just like the GOP.

But with one difference.

The Dems spend the money at home, to benefit the country.

GOP spend the money in foreign countries, like that ******** Iraq to benefit their buddies in Halliburton.

Reply to this comment
by repo_man_08 February 9, 2009 12:09 AM EST
Once it''''s perfectly straight, it''''s useless.
Posted by erasmus606 at 09:03 PM : Feb 08, 2009

not necessarily

then it''s good for OTHER things....

:-)
Reply to this comment
by erasmus606 February 9, 2009 12:08 AM EST
Clinton left a minefield for whoever came after him.

Posted by repo_man_08 at 08:48 PM : Feb 08, 2009

Clinton was a waaaaay better President than Bush.

And tell me, did Bush even make an ATTEMPT at fixing any of those problems? Or was he too busy starting wars?:)

Reply to this comment
by shrubblows February 9, 2009 12:08 AM EST
paapy time to retire....
Reply to this comment
by repo_man_08 February 9, 2009 12:07 AM EST
Except you left out the GW part.
Posted by gravyboat63 at 09:03 PM : Feb 08, 2009

I SAID Madoff was part of the MESS that Clinton left for Bush.

It would be nonsense to say Bush left a mess for Bush.

yes, Bush utterly failed to deal with the Madoff mess just like he fouled up everything else he touched, including his Segway (he fell off).

It''s truly astonishing that ANYBODY let him fly a jet plane by himself.

But the TOPIC was Clinton, not Bush.

And if you don''t believe that Madoff was originally turned in in 2000, LOOK IT UP.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito February 9, 2009 12:04 AM EST
Shipping jobs out NECESSARILY means increasing imports to bring the goods here.

Posted by repo_man_08 at 08:59 PM : Feb 08, 2009

It''s a catch-22. Shipping jobs out means lost jobs and reduced income for U.S. workers. Which increases demand for cheap imports. Which means more jobs are shipped out. It''s a lose-lose situation for America.
Reply to this comment
See all 351 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER