342 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JDDDDDDDDDDD says:
A tax preparer told me that it is "very common" for people who don't file taxes in a particular year to allow someone else to claim their kid. They just give the third party the kid's social security number and the third party gets a nice chunk of change.

The people of Minnesota who pay high state and property taxes need to realize the reason for their high tax rates is because people in their state re gaming the system. Not saying she did, but if Bachman gamed the system to receive monthly payments for her "foster kids" her "father's farm" her "husband's psychology office" the people of Minnesota should know that's coming out of their pocket.

Bachman had worked as a tax attorney for the IRS so I'm sure she learned how to game the system. The big question I would think is did she do it legally. Did she really take those kids in or was it just a use of Social Security numbers as I've heard is quite common.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
politicallyincorrect1160 says:
As someone who has taken in a number of "rescue" kids in the neighborhood while my children were going through MS/HS...I can tell you that the term "raising" has a broader meaning. Yes, I raised my biological children from birth to adulthood, but the dozen or so I took in over the years (recommended by the school or asked by a family, etc.) whose "stay" lasted anywhere from several months to a year, consisted of heavy-duty, loving, caring, structure, support, and RAISING! Living with an active family from day-to-day, 24/7, gives these kids a chance to see how "normal" can be defined -- from either laughter, spills, or spats at the dinner table...sibling issues and resolution...grocery shopping/budgets, etc...and normal daily occurrences that fall under "raising." I give the Bachman family an A+ for doing what they did, and having the open heart and home they offered. Don't ever think that the time she and her family devoted to those 23 additional children did not fall under the heading of "raising!!!"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
idealot says:
#9: Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness

"We're not going to break the truth, we're just going to bend it a little." I'm sure she can explain it to Saint Peter on That Day.

She's a liar, thus a Commandment breaker, and thus a religious hypocrite. But what's not to like?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
KampungHighlander says:
According to the data I have seen she would have received about $700 per month, per child. If she was taking in 3 kids at one time that would be $2100 per month.

http://www.hunter.cuny.edu/socwork/nrcfcpp/downloads/foster-care-maintenance-payments.pdf
reply
msbuddy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
To KHighlander--sounds like another scam on her part--paid off her student loans::If a child stayed 1 week she probably got a check for the month up front!!I had an aunt and uncle who had a foster son from the time he was 11 until he went to navy after high school::Their 2 children were gone from the home as adults!! He needed a home--they loved him like their own--he was with them when the biological kids couldn't be!! Was nice to see!!Uncle worked nights--someone home with Auntie!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
defeese says:
It documents that she has compassion, something the Leftists alway claim when the want more redistribution of other people's earning, but nothing they can ever document.

Cretins!
reply
whjohnsonjr replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Forgoing hundreds of thousands of dollars in order to help the poor as a community organizer could be considered compassionate. Foster parents are paid well per kid in my state; probably Minnesota as well.
Jmpnjackflash replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It doesn't document any such thing.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bree1345 says:
Excuse me but what does fostering children no matter for what length of time have to do with running the United States? It should be based on what and who can handle the corruption and disarray in congress that we have now and how it can be fixed so we get out of this mess the US is in.
reply
pjbfny replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Could have something to do with her misrepresenting facts, which has a LOT to do with whether we want someone as a presidential candidate.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
philagumbo says:
I'm not a Republican and i'm not supporting any candidate. My comment is about the obvious bias of the media. Starting with Hillary, they have systematically attacked any and every challenger to their chosen candidate. They aren't supposed to have a chosen candidate". They are supposed to be journalists.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
philagumbo says:
Did Obama really work for ACORN? Was he really involved in the Fanny May debacle? Did he really attend a church for twenty years that practices negative preaching and teaching against America?
Is Brian Montopoli really a "senior political reporter" for CBS?
He sounds more like a middle school reporter. As usual you ignore the elephants in the room with Obama and bend over backwards trying to find or create a scandal with his opponents. This is not news. This is unfair and biased "reporting" ( I use the term very loosely).
reply
peterpun111 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
What!?! This article is about Bachman and her variations on the truth. Where did this usual toxic republican spewage come from?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
duude2u says:
Anyone who assumes any statement mentioning raising 23 foster kids means its from cradle to adulthood is ignorant of what raising foster kids really means. Rarely, will a baby be picked up as a foster child. Babies are in big demand to be adopted which is the better alternative. Foster children are parented for a limited period of time. That's the system of raising foster children. Any one thinking it means something else is just ignorant.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sharon3780 says:
I work in foster care in CT and I know the person who licensed her (we work on the National level for foster parents as well). She did what she needed to do to get licensed, but at times she took kids in for as little as a few hours while they tried to get the child into another home because she didn't have the "time" Many other times, she wasn't physically there herself
reply
1/13
Scroll Left Scroll Right