61 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tonyv414 says:
Sure the government spends money, but where does it spend that money? Yes, a small percentage (less than 10 percent) goes into spending outside of the United States in terms of interest paid to foreign lenders and other foreign interest and trade imbalances, but the majority of that money goes right back into the U.S. economy. Government spending is just a pump that tries to keep a large consumer-based economy flowing and somewhat distributed. And what about Entitlement monies? The fact is that people who are living on entitlements generally do not hoard that money - social security checks generally get spent even before they are recieved, and they get spent right back in the U.S. economy. Ask your local grocer or other retailer how much of his net receivables come from social security checks, welfare checks and food stamp programs. Entitlement monies end up in the coffers of private enterprise just like any other form of spending.
The biggest problem with the U.S. economy is NOT government spending, but the problem is rather the amount of outflow from the private sector into foreign investment that is not returned. Ask the multinationals about their budgets.
U.S. citizens should pay more attention to where their private sector investment goes rather than what the government spends. U.S. citizens really need to be taught how the world economy works instead of just listening to mindless rhetoric and half-truths.
The cost of government has absolutely nothing to do with the decline of civilization in the United States. The problems lie entirely within the imbalance, greed, and general ethical bankruptcy within the private sector.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ozark_Sunshine says:
Where was CBS when the Democratic held Congress and president were running upthese figures? Oh yeah, you were carrying the water for them. You criticize the new House leadership yet have said nothing since the Dems took contol in 2007. I look forward to CBS News gfoing out of business and all of you libs being fired.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Mokkie57 says:
Can you cut 10% of all federal spending? I don't think so. We may be at the mercy of the federal government.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RedWings_ninety_one says:
In case no one has not figured it out yet (or if the story said it), that is $114166.67 per second. Which sadly is more than most Americans make in a year..way to waste out money..
reply
gary_downing replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Did you say make a year? I would have to work for ever and still never make even close to that.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RobAla says:
We have had an out of control and irresponsible group of politicians in Washington spending the nation toward bankruptcy. At last, we now have a few newly elected representatives in Washington who are beginning to behave like adults. Hopefully, they will bring the crazy spending under control. Hopefully, they will reduce the size and scope of the federal government to a manageable level - and reduce the government to one that the American people and businesses can afford. This crap has gone on way too long.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pasha128 says:
Another denier of the impartial referee's (CBO's) assessment that the Health Care Reform act will save $230 billion in the FIRST 10 YEARS and over a TRILLION DOLLARS in the second 10 years. Not to mention the fact the MEDICARE PART D (prescription drugs) that were migrating into the paid for category BECAUSE OF THE DEMOCRATS will go back on the REPUBLICAN CREDIT CARD (passed in 2003 by a REPUBLICAN CONGRESS and SIGNED INTO LAW BY A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT). That cost $1 TRILLION DOLLARS for the 10 years 2003 - 2013 and considerably MORE for each 10 year block after 2013.
reply
samXXkiley replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
coucou,
le co?t de la medicare est insignifiant par rapport aux millions de dollars d?pens?s par ce gouvernement et par minute, c'est faramineux comme somme,
=======
the cost of Medicare is insignificant compared to the millions of dollars spent by this government and by minute, as phenomenal sum, au revoir
pasha128 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sam do you understand the post is in favor of NOT DEFICIT SPENDING over a TRILLION DOLLARS every 10 years BY KEEPING THE HEALTH CARE REFORM ACT? Traditional Medicare that is paid for by payroll taxes is not the issue. The fact that Democrats are moving Medicare Part D (prescription drugs) into that same category (overriding a REPUBLICAN CONGRESS and A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT that put this benefit on the CREDIT CARD IN 2003) is a positive development. Allowing Medicare Part D to remain indefinitely on the credit card fuels arguments to eliminate it -- a situation remedied by the Democrats.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ur_shadow says:
The demise of any nation or state happens after their governments get drunk on power... and of course spend like drunken sailors.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jhihmoac says:
Wow...they must be conserving after the holidays...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samXXkiley says:
coucou,
c'est injuste le gouvernement d?pense des millions de dollars par minute,
et ce m?me gouvernement se plaint parce que la r?forme de la sant? est co?teuse.

*****
it is unfair the government is spending millions of dollars per minute,
and the same government complains because the health reform is expensive. au revoir
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
We have to stop the corporate welfare and the giveaways and entitlements for the rich. The government needs the money that is being stolen by tax breaks to provide the necessities of life for its people. That is why we have government.
reply
ljmckay replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
"The government needs the money that is being stolen by tax breaks to provide the necessities of life for its people. That is why we have government"

No that's your job. It's not the governments job or responsibility to provide anything other than security
bileven replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
When did it become the responsibilty of 10% of the people to support the other 90%? If someone earns more than 250,000 from going to college, working their way up the ladder and being successful, why do they have to turn around and pay for a bunch of lazy bums that drop out of school, sit on their butts and do nothign but get high and breed?

This is the Land of Equal Opprotunity, NOT the Land of Equal Results... Those Rich people already pay 35% of their income, plus pay employees wages AND benefits... With the cuts, they are paying over 75% of the total amount... So much for being fair... How about you trying paying the same total amount they send?
1/4