21 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
documemts says:
Guess he feels its OK to destroy evidence and conspire to cover-up the friendly fire death of Pat Tillman. This guy had no business heading up the war in Afghanistan.
reply
AustinHook replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The military is all about courage. It should include courage to tell the truth.
xmissile replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Agreed. A sader situation was posthumously awarding the Silver Star to this guy and telling his family that he was a war hero only to have them find out later that he was shot in the head three time by our own forces. Add that to ridiculing his boss in public and you have one dishonorable man.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
imnho says:
The general has a point. There may well be to much information that is classified. The problem with the leaking is that sooner or latter they will comproimse either a major intellegence capabilty or a human asset. In the case of the human asset that could mean the persons death.
reply
AustinHook replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The problem about not leaking is that sooner or later the public will be beguiled into thinking war is OK, and that will include a lot or persons deaths.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rockcutr says:
Toy soldiers with lots of tin badges and no security within their ranks, might consider shutting their pie hole. The arrogant reply of civilians reading these documents not having the ability to discern is arrogant and condecending. The general has way too much starch in his shorts. He is most certainly chaffing. This is more about his lack of control than a leak of oh so truthfull and truth telling documents.

wonder why these things even exist. paper trails tell on ya. horrible security to have such a thing.

This may or may not assist the enemy. Don't see how. Unless of course the man with starch in his shorts has a political opinion. Wait, he may not have an opinion that the president did not give him. I believe the general has broken ranks. He should send his sorryass directly to the stockade to make an honorable example of himself for the terrible lack of ability to actually contain, rule and dominate his F troops.
reply
AustinHook replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I get the feeling that McCrystal did what he thought was best, responding to the culture around him. I see that he did have a bit of conscience, even if he succumbed to the lying culture he was immersed in. As to his firing, I think that was one of the most unjust reasons for dismissal I have seen in a long while. His private comments do show a certain awareness of the absurdity of his place in history. I think maybe he was on the verge of coming to understand it. He was in over his head but he kept on trying. I have a certain sympathy for the chap, and that much less for Obama after McCrystal's firing.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
omnibus66 says:
I am sure that Hermann Goering would also gave been upset if details of SS activities had been made public during the Third Reich. All sorts of scummy vermin hide from the light.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
underdogus007 says:
I say waterboard the truth out of Gen. Stanley McChrystal.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jaylah54 says:
Just like his mentor, Cheney. Running off at the mouth about stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with him. Given the fact that he was officially relieved of his last command, with more than sufficient reason, perhaps the smartest thing for him to do would be to just shut up. But, just like his mentor Cheney, he'll find that impossible to do. Both of them had their chance and they blew it.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Reality-Checker says:
General McChrystal's sadness is easy to identify with, but even greater issues loom over our heads, since it is clear that secrets are harder to keep when wars last so long, or mission definitions change. The whole premise of Wikileaks is that no other enforcement authority is around to keep the Defense Department honest. News media faces censorship, but internal leaks to the internet are effective and powerful.

Warmongering is not popular when citizens stop and talk about fiscal responsibility. It is perceived as wasteful.

The Cold War was over in 1989, but little headway has been made to re-organize government and scale back military spending. Fighting a war against an actual nation with a unified command and control authority is one thing, but fighting against a band of pirates, thugs, or terrorists is another. Fighting organized crime is a high priority for many countries with ailing economies, but you don't fight it by going deep into debt, or creating more economic hardship for the citizens you are trying to protect.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Scimajor says:
I would think this is a perfect job for USCYBERCOM. It would be a pretty trivial operation to shut the site down through a variety of means.
reply
AustinHook replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Just what we need. More money spent on an entirely hopeless task. Unless you want to take out the entire Internet you will never get more than a few moments of satisfaction when the information will just pop up somewhere else. Sure, maybe you could keep the US voting public in the dark a few weeks longer, by some twisted process, but the rest of the world would know. You belong working for the Chinese, and their hopeless great firewall.

Scimajor, I put you in charge of the neo-Index Librorum Prohibitorum, and laugh as you make more popular whatever it is that you would prohibit!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stn_sage says:
Yes! It's very sad! That, the American public wasn't told that there are a fair number of it's soldiers over in Iraq and Afghanistan murdering anything 'that moves', regardless, of whether it's an enemy soldier or not; including, women, children, and old people, all of whom, are unarmed!
reply
Scimajor replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
We got exactly what our tax dollars are paying for, mindless killing machines that will do anything that they are ordered to do. Soldiers are taut not to think for themselves and to follow orders blindly. I guess the moral is "Be careful what you ask for".
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Simifanene says:
George Bush, and Dick Cheney have been accused of war crimes today. It's your duty Mr. President to order a congresional investigation to prove or disprove the charges for the sake of our flag. Our honor is at stake. As a loyal American Vet who want's all terrorist in chains I ask our President to investigate these allegations for the sake of our flag and in the name of all who have died, been tortured or worse. Our principles are great and if any American is part of this they need to be prosecuted. No man is above the law in America. Torture and war crimes are against are law. I or you would be prosecuted for these crimes. Whom ever is involved in this must be brought to justice by a court of his peer's. If not then every law in America has no meaning. Justice for some is not justice. Justice for all means even the rich, the powerful or even the President is accountable to the law. If not our law is unjust and tyranical. We would then be what the enemy cry's out. We're not that and Mr. President, you must order a congressional investigation to protect are legal system, our flag and everything we stand for.*********************************************************************I agree with a heavy heart.
reply
1/2