21 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
endurorob_5 says:
euge005 March 31, 2011 5:58 AM EDT
Maybe that is why he has not sent any troops? He is much more intelligent, honest and prudent than you give the man credit for. Maybe listen to him. Itis about humanitarian effort to save people. Now if it were Bush, the troops hit the beach, ignore the people and deploy to protect the oil fields & terminals. That is the difference. Much more responsible and deserves full support.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Wow! You really buy his BS? Humanitarian effort? This is a military effort in support of rebel forces not a humanitarian effort.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
guyfrompa46 says:
euge005- Did you say he's much more intelligent? Ah now I see, you voted for this idiot and this is your way of justifying it.. What ajoke. Really Dude? Come on wake up and admit you f***** up by putting this clown in office.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
guyfrompa46 says:
This will confuse our idiot in chief even more so. He couldn't decdie what top do before and now throw this wrench into it and watch the fireworks.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
euge005 says:
There might be someone inclined to support the terrorists, true. But there might be some martians too. No point making policy from fears of the unknown. Mubarek used that boogie man for 30 years to hold onto his authority and became worse than the threat he used.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bamio says:
President Barack Obama, as an Illinois state senator in 2002, said that using military force to topple a murderous dictator amounted to a "dumb war" and should be opposed.

Hypocrite!!!
reply
euge005 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Maybe that is why he has not sent any troops? He is much more intelligent, honest and prudent than you give the man credit for. Maybe listen to him. Itis about humanitarian effort to save people. Now if it were Bush, the troops hit the beach, ignore the people and deploy to protect the oil fields & terminals. That is the difference. Much more responsible and deserves full support.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bamio says:
To say Obamie screwed up would be to charitable. The far more likely that Obamie has known he would aid Al Qaeda's ascent in Libya, all along. No group has made out as well during Obamie's tenure as his fellow Muslims.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MEW29 says:
Arming these rebels is just a re-enactment of some of our prior follies in Afghanistan and elsewhere. WRITE TO YOUR SENATOR. Stop this folly before it goes any further.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
askagain says:
We have to be crazy to support either side in Libya. It is a no win proposistion. Either way, we become the bad guy.
reply
euge005 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
We have been the bad guy for 50 yrs supporting Israeli occupation of the west bank. This is to win some friends when the whole group of corrupt old dictators die or get deposed. Good thinking. About time to have a balanced, smart policy with Nuiance.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fedup12 says:
We are always going to be too stupid to stay out of this s. But at least with Libya we arent getting azz deep like Iraq.

McCain would have us there. He wants us there now.

Relic of a past era worshiping USA's past superpowerdom.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tiredofthebs says:
"Change we can believe in ......"

Yeah .... right. The US still hasn't learned it's lesson about meddling in the affairs of other nations. I can only imagine what type of "support" the CIA is lending to the (Al Qaeda) rebels. Imagine if Osama and the gang gain control of an oil rich nation. The US has as much business in Libya as we did in Iraq & Afghanistan. Get out NOW, and save what little face is left.
reply
1/2
Scroll Left Scroll Right