36 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sebastian27-2009 says:
The federal government is controlled by hypocrits. The cry and wail about no one saving money, then drive interest rates down to where you are actually LOOSING money by doing so.
This has forced many of us conservative folks into the investing in the stock market where we have lost our shirts partially because of deregulation of the markets.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dumdnc says:
As the chosen one's pit bull said (rahm emanuel)"this is a disaster too good to pass up". The present administration is dead set on keeping this economic mess going. Every time someone in that administration opens their mouth the market goes down and that's what they want.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
labrat9999 says:
I'm alwasy amazed at how clever and smart people are in hindsight and how now they know how to fix the problem six months ago. I certainly hope we aren't paying these media types, and economists much money. Any idiot can look backwards and see a train wreck that already happened. Look forward and tell me what the future holds!! Now that would be intelligent. And by the way, for the media types, please stop interviewing one another, you are not professional in the economic arena. So spend a little and get some advise from some of these Phd types with a background in the subject.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
markangeloo says:
Today because I had lost my ATM card
I actually went inside my bank.
They enticed me to open a savings acount.
I almost laughed out loud with scorn
when they told me the interest rate!
.01% How do they expect anyone to save at those numbers.
RAISE INTEREST RATES NOW
The stimulus should be paid to real investers.
They should have been raised ages ago but
were kept low to blind citizens to the Iraq War
while the housing circus was on going.
In actuality realestate never went up
but the dollar went DOWN.
This was reflected in gold price.
Amerika is no better than Argentina.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ubrew12 says:
declanm said: "ubrew12: It's trivially true that not all tax cuts lead to growth and not all tax increases lead to recession. But the edge cases don't inform the general rule."

Which is that tax cuts lead to growth? To me, era's of low taxes lead, demonstrably, to economic collapse, while era's of high taxes lead, just as easily demonstrated, to economic ascendency (not to mention cultural ascendency). Witness the Gilded Age, low taxes, leading to a bubble economy in the 1920s and the Great Depression in the 1930's. Witness the New Deal, high taxes, leading to Age of America by 1945 that lasted until 1975 (about the time they started cutting taxes). Witness the Reagan Age, low taxes, leading to the bubble economy in the 2000s, and a new Great Depression in the 2010s.

Seems pretty clearcut to me. This bankrupt nation bears no resemblance to the America of the 1950s-1960s that boldly confronted racism, communism, sexism, poverty, Vietnam, and the moon and won on (almost) every count while remaining solvent, leading the world economically and in innovation, and working 20% fewer hours per work-week than it does now.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dlatkinson1 says:
I wished I would''ve stuck to my guns when I talked to our broker last March about completely getting out of the market. That time, he talked us out of it. Fortunately, I stuck to my guns in early October, and we sold all of our stocks and mutual funds and put the proceeds into 3 and 4-month FDIC-insured CDs. Even with measly interest payments of about a .5% a year, we''re not going backwards anymore.

Of course, we need more than a half a percent interest to live on, as this was our retirement money. Still, I am in no hurry to move ANYTHING back into the market. I have absolutely no faith in Obama or the Democrats in Congress, spending borrowed money like the world was going to end next week. I think things will get MUCH WORSE before they get better, and the fact that short-term CDs are paying such pitiful interest is a reflection of how many others feel the same way.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dlatkinson1 says:
I wished I would''ve stuck to my guns when I talked to our broker last March about completely getting out of the market. That time, he talked us out of it. Fortunately, I stuck to my guns in early October, and we sold all of our stocks and mutual funds and put the proceeds into 3 and 4-month FDIC-insured CDs. Even with measly interest payments of about a .5% a year, we''re not going backwards anymore.

Of course, we need more than a half a percent interest to live on, as this was our retirement money. Still, I am in no hurry to move ANYTHING back into the market. I have absolutely no faith in Obama or the Democrats in Congress, spending borrowed money like the world was going to end next week. I think things will get MUCH WORSE before they get better, and the fact that short-term CDs are paying such pitiful interest is a reflection of how many others feel the same way.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jbrown88881 says:
"It''''s too bad that CBS can''''t find someone to write this column who actually knows something about markets and economics."


It''s a mystery what CBS sees in this clown. He has nothing to say. Perhaps he''s good at soothing the hemorrhoids of CBS execs. He is from San Francisco, ya know.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jbrown88881 says:
"If Stocks Are in Turmoil, Blame the Feds "


Stocks aren''t in turmoil. It''s just that the Walstreeters are having a little temper tantrum because they''re not getting their suckie-suck like they got from Georgie Bushit and the Neoconscum.

Well, Walstreeters, you are irrelevant. We have learned that you just lie and cheat your way to money by stealing from us.

Get any money you have left OUT of Walstreet, and let the Bushit Banker Billionaires go suck sand.

It''s nothing but a swindle, so who cares what their phony numbers show?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
taxguydave says:
OK, Declan

Actually read the SEC order that is linked to from the summary page your link points to. (I know, it''s 24 pages and has lots of long words...)

http://www.sec.gov/rules/other/2008/34-58592.pdf

You''ll see that the order is directed at "naked" short selling (which I believe should be illegal anyway). If you don''t know the difference between covered and uncovered short sales, then you''re out of your league here.

I''m not going to dig up one of your own articles. You know what you wrote and when you wrote it. Or at least you should...

As it happens, I charge enough for my tax and financial advice to somehow make a higher income than almost any journalist. Somehow, I manage to get away with it, and have for over 20 years.
reply
3/4