Comments on: Texas Approves Massive Wind Power Project

New Transmission Lines Will Bring Power From Windy West Texas To Urban Areas

Add a Comment See all 33 Comments
by cfin5 July 17, 2008 11:09 PM EDT
Posted by libsluv2spit at 07:43 PM : Jul 17, 2008--- Good point. The machine must do its job or it''s useless.
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit July 17, 2008 10:46 PM EDT
It''''s a good thing Texas no longer has Bush as governor otherwise there would just be more oil drilling and continued dependence on Oil men whoops the Arabs for oil.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by apple2pie at 05:18 PM : Jul 17, 2008
+ report abuse


************

the only way we can end this dependency if for you to stop whinning like a little bi*tch and START CONSERVING..
Reply to this comment
by collegedudeu July 17, 2008 10:45 PM EDT
ubrew12

You''re right. Why would Texas want to replace those beautiful drilling rigs and offshore oil platforms with those UGLY windmills.
Reply to this comment
by libsluv2spit July 17, 2008 10:43 PM EDT
Windmills are UGLY, unless they are all of the same design, are regularly spaced and not too close together. The way California did its wind-farms is, from miles and miles away, INCREDIBLY UGLY!!!

Take heed Texas. Even alternative energy has its down sides. Wind''''s is UGLY, unless its done tastefully and with an eye to esthetics. Look to Europe: they impose regulations that each ''''eye-full'''' of wind farm should be composed of basically ONE design, regularly spaced, and not too close together.

When done that way, wind farms can display the ''''music of the spheres''''. Done the California way, they are more like urban blight in the country. No faster way to shut down enthusiasm for wind than to destroy everyones view.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by ubrew12 at 07:21 PM : Jul 17, 2008
+ report abuse


*********

California windmills are created not to please the eye but to provide energy to a very fiendish economy. It was extensively design to maxmimize the drag..and the logistics is to create a vortex..meaning as more wind picks up there is a disturbance in flow hence HELPING the rotation of the blades..EFFECIENCY outweighs asthetics.
Reply to this comment
by messiahx4eve July 17, 2008 10:39 PM EDT
Ah come on now, this is too easy and it''''''''s like begging for it.
what are you saying here..that if the wind blows you are easy and are not beyond begging for it.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by bustaMcnutty at 06:15 PM : Jul 17, 2008
So Sorry dude, I guess I should have specified your wife. You must be from texass, right?
Reply to this comment
by cfin5 July 17, 2008 10:31 PM EDT
Posted by ubrew12 at 07:21 PM : Jul 17, 2008--- I can go for what you''ve said. An ugly car won''t sell even if it would be a gem to own.
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 July 17, 2008 10:21 PM EDT
Just a NIMBY suggestion.

Windmills are UGLY, unless they are all of the same design, are regularly spaced and not too close together. The way California did its wind-farms is, from miles and miles away, INCREDIBLY UGLY!!!

Take heed Texas. Even alternative energy has its down sides. Wind''s is UGLY, unless its done tastefully and with an eye to esthetics. Look to Europe: they impose regulations that each ''eye-full'' of wind farm should be composed of basically ONE design, regularly spaced, and not too close together.

When done that way, wind farms can display the ''music of the spheres''. Done the California way, they are more like urban blight in the country. No faster way to shut down enthusiasm for wind than to destroy everyones view.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 July 17, 2008 10:02 PM EDT
At last. Something good coming out of Texas!
Reply to this comment
by cfin5 July 17, 2008 9:50 PM EDT
This is some good news here. Nothing to look at on this barren landscape anyhow,....except free fuel electricity generation in windy areas. I wouldn''t mind seeing these around in the least. I prefer these over nuclear power plants, though I''m not against them. It''s just that certain areas of our country should have pertinent electricity generators. Simple everyday common sense,...that''s free too, so use it.
Reply to this comment
by bustamcnutty July 17, 2008 9:15 PM EDT
Ah come on now, this is too easy and it''''s like begging for it.
what are you saying here..that if the wind blows you are easy and are not beyond begging for it.
Reply to this comment
by messiahx4eve July 17, 2008 8:29 PM EDT
Ah come on now, this is too easy and it''s like begging for it.
Reply to this comment
by bustamcnutty July 17, 2008 7:55 PM EDT
ken lay never died,some poor sap got knocked out and plastic surgury done on him.he got the ax and ken lay is on the beach with elvis.
Reply to this comment
by eggy1620 July 17, 2008 6:44 PM EDT
Dr. FrankenPickens is going to bring Ken Lay back to life to administer the business end of this plan.
Reply to this comment
See all 33 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Iran OKs 10 New Uranium Enrichment Sites

    (252 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: