Comments on: Palin Breaks With McCain On Gay Marriage Ban
Add a Comment See all 154 Comments
- Sarah lover why don''t you just go live in Iran then? Make sure you wear the proper Hijab though, unless you want to go to jail for not doing so. Where are you from? It''s really disturbing to know you live in the same country I do.
- Reply to this comment
- "%u201CI''m not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can''t do, should and should not do.... "
Um, Sarah? But you just said you''d like it to be a Federal Amendment? Typical. Can''t be a republican without the need to control everyone else''s lives!
**********. - Reply to this comment
- Ahmadinejad said that there are no gayss in Iran, why dont we get rid of ours too?
Posted by Sarah_Lover
YOU ARE SICK AND TWISTED!
the reason that iran has no *** is because they murder them, no matter who they are, how old they are or even if they have real proof.
THEY EVEN SLAUGHTER CHILDREN IF THEY THINK THEY ARE GAY.
WHY DONT WE JUST GET RID OF ALL THE HOMOSEXUALS!? WHY!? because they are different?
You know Hitler said the same thing about Jews.
People like you deffinetly need to be locked up. - Reply to this comment
- First there was "W" the first certified illiterate President and then we have Sarah, who wants to be the first Bigotted Moron in the White House. What''s next Republicans, Homer Simpson for Secretary of State?----- Oh shucks, now I''ve given them an idea.
- Reply to this comment
- There were ancient societies were homosexuality was very accepted. Including among the Greeks. There are questions that Alexander the Great may have had male lovers. It became frowned upon under Christianity. It is not correct that it was never acceptable.
Posted by natia45
********
Yes, there have been homosexuals throughout history. Maybe Alexander the Great had male lovers, who cares. Marriage still shouldn''t be redefined. - Reply to this comment
- Kittykatty2, do you actually believe what you write?? I''m asking you to prove what your stated about another human being and you should be able to back it up with proof, of course, unless you don''t have proof and I know you don''t because if it was so, the media would be on it like white on rice, so bottomline, you don''t have proof and as always, you throw something out to hurt someone and when someone calls you on it, you state something else and then you resent the fact that I am trying to get you to stay on the accusation that you have made but you don''t want to discuss that. Ask for paying taxes, hey, read the Bible, what does Jesus say: %u201CRender unto Caesar the things which are Caesar%u2019s, and unto God the things that are God%u2019s.%u201D This is what I believe, now BACK UP YOUR STATEMENT ABOUT THESE AFFAIR(S)! Stop trying to run especially when you have the nerve to say something so ugly about another person without proof! KITTYKATT2, BACK WHAT YOU ARE ACCUSING ANOTHER PERSON OF BY PROVIDIN PROOF, BACK IT UP WITH FACTS!!!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- Kittykatty2, do you actually believe what you write?? I''m asking you to prove what your stated about another human being and you should be able to back it up with proof, of course, unless you don''t have proof and I know you don''t because if it was so, the media would be on it like white on rice, so bottomline, you don''t have proof and as always, you throw something out to hurt someone and when someone calls you on it, you state something else and then you resent the fact that I am trying to get you to stay on the accusation that you have made but you don''t want to discuss that. Ask for paying taxes, hey, read the Bible, what does Jesus say: %u201CRender unto Caesar the things which are Caesar%u2019s, and unto God the things that are God%u2019s.%u201D This is what I believe, now BACK UP YOUR STATEMENT ABOUT THESE AFFAIR(S)! Stop trying to run especially when you have the nerve to say something so ugly about another person without proof! KITTYKATT2, BACK WHAT YOU ARE ACCUSING ANOTHER PERSON OF BY PROVIDIN PROOF, BACK IT UP WITH FACTS!!!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- Nancy Naive, the wingnuts are the ones that want to redefine Marriage. As far back as time goes and all across the planet, marriage has always been between a man and woman. The radicals are the ones that want to change that. Idiot Judges that legislate from the bench. That doesn''t mean that *** shouldn''t have rights or respect. Just not marriage.
- Reply to this comment
- seriously an iq test shoudl be required in able to be eligible to vote.
I WAS NOT ABUSED BY MY FATHER IN ANY WAY!
oh and which commandment stated "judge thy neighbor?" - Reply to this comment
- "First of all gayss arent born gayss. Their father neglect them and then they are abused and become gayss. Secondly a man who thinks he"s a woman and vice-versa has a serious mental disease and should receive free mental treatment from the government so they can get back their own gender instead of more and more rights.Period. "
tsk tsk tsk sarah lover, this is why we have an educational system in America. But it seems as though ignorance is a comfortable state for you. While you''re out there thinking you know why people are gay, make sure you do some protesting of blacks being able to own land...or better yet, women having the right to vote. Prejudice/racism is disgusting and ignorant and I feel the utmost shame and pity for you. Knowing what you know about father''s neglect being the reason why someone would be gay must mean you''ve spoken to every single homesexual out there. How do you have time to pee? - Reply to this comment