Comments on: Palin Breaks With McCain On Gay Marriage Ban
Add a Comment See all 154 Comments
- "Perhaps the disciple is never named, never individualized, so that we can more easily accept that he bears witness to an intimacy that is meant for each one of us. The closeness that he enjoyed is a sign of the closeness that is mine and yours because we are in Christ and Christ is in us.
- Reply to this comment
- cbs3200 at 06:30 PM : Oct 20, 2008 wrote:
"Are your parents related ... as
in cousins ????"
I suspect they are brother and sister. - Reply to this comment
- I urge you all to read a little history on the separation of church and state. It was our most important freedom at the time of this country''s creation for a very good reason. Worldwide, it was quite an incredible concept. Yet only a couple of hundred years later, we stand ready to throw the concept out with the bathwater. Marriage is many things, legal, social and spiritual. Legally (which is what the *** are asking for) it is an agreement between individuals and adults to abide by certain tax rules, and be treated in a certain matter under contracts and law. Socially (*** already have this) it''s a ceremony or party to announce a life commitment to someone. Religion (*** don''t want this) you seem pretty opinionated on already. You are priming Sarah Palin to be the first Theocratic Dictator of this once free land. She will make the Taliban look like disneyworld.
- Reply to this comment
- Sarah_Lover at 06:24 PM : Oct 20, 2008 wrote:
"Sarah Palin is Americas last hope to save our children and preserve our society."
So, you would like all our children to become corrupt - morally and financially - just like your hero Sarah Palin?
Here''s a hint for you:
Sarah Palin conceived out of wedlock, against her "christian" values, and instilled the same values into her daughter.
What do you think the Bible says about *** outside of marriage?
And you think that Sarah Palin is our last hope?
Wow - I guess you won''t be happy until America is full of unwed, pregnant teens. - Reply to this comment
- That means Palin supports a thoecrazy instead of a Republic.
- Reply to this comment
- Jesus told his disciples to "love one another as I have loved you". Then on at least two occasions, the bible refers to "the disciple that Jesus loved". It appears that Jesus loved one disciple in a manner that differed from the other way that he loved the other disciples. There are only two ways that we can view that condition. One is that Jesus was gay, the other is that the disciple was a woman. I lean toward the disciple being a woman.
- Reply to this comment
- Sarah_Lover at 05:30 PM : Oct 20, 2008 wrote:
"First of all gayss arent born gayss. Their father neglect them and then they are abused and become gayss. Secondly a man who thinks he"s a woman and vice-versa has a serious mental disease and should receive free mental treatment from the government so they can get back their own gender instead of more and more rights.Period."
Are you back smoking crack? - Reply to this comment
- What happened to Palin''s "the States should decide" Federalist view?
- Reply to this comment
- I really dont understand why our Palin and Mccain are trying to ban gay marriage, it''s not right. I mean am only 14 years old but thats wrong. You cant make a couple that gay not legitmate, or get marry to woman. If they dont like the opposite *** and liek there *** then whats the problem with a gay marriage. In my opinion Mccain and Palin are not making a change in our community,there just making it worse. VOTE FOR BARRACK OBAMA!!! Change will make life easier than today
- Reply to this comment
- Sarah_Lover at 06:04 PM : Oct 20, 2008 wrote:
"Ahmadinejad said that there are no gayss in Iran, why dont we get rid of ours too?"
Maybe we could start with you. - Reply to this comment
- Sarah lover why don''t you just go live in Iran then? Make sure you wear the proper Hijab though, unless you want to go to jail for not doing so. Where are you from? It''s really disturbing to know you live in the same country I do.
- Reply to this comment
- "%u201CI''m not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can''t do, should and should not do.... "
Um, Sarah? But you just said you''d like it to be a Federal Amendment? Typical. Can''t be a republican without the need to control everyone else''s lives!
**********. - Reply to this comment
- Ahmadinejad said that there are no gayss in Iran, why dont we get rid of ours too?
Posted by Sarah_Lover
YOU ARE SICK AND TWISTED!
the reason that iran has no *** is because they murder them, no matter who they are, how old they are or even if they have real proof.
THEY EVEN SLAUGHTER CHILDREN IF THEY THINK THEY ARE GAY.
WHY DONT WE JUST GET RID OF ALL THE HOMOSEXUALS!? WHY!? because they are different?
You know Hitler said the same thing about Jews.
People like you deffinetly need to be locked up. - Reply to this comment
- First there was "W" the first certified illiterate President and then we have Sarah, who wants to be the first Bigotted Moron in the White House. What''s next Republicans, Homer Simpson for Secretary of State?----- Oh shucks, now I''ve given them an idea.
- Reply to this comment
- There were ancient societies were homosexuality was very accepted. Including among the Greeks. There are questions that Alexander the Great may have had male lovers. It became frowned upon under Christianity. It is not correct that it was never acceptable.
Posted by natia45
********
Yes, there have been homosexuals throughout history. Maybe Alexander the Great had male lovers, who cares. Marriage still shouldn''t be redefined. - Reply to this comment
- Kittykatty2, do you actually believe what you write?? I''m asking you to prove what your stated about another human being and you should be able to back it up with proof, of course, unless you don''t have proof and I know you don''t because if it was so, the media would be on it like white on rice, so bottomline, you don''t have proof and as always, you throw something out to hurt someone and when someone calls you on it, you state something else and then you resent the fact that I am trying to get you to stay on the accusation that you have made but you don''t want to discuss that. Ask for paying taxes, hey, read the Bible, what does Jesus say: %u201CRender unto Caesar the things which are Caesar%u2019s, and unto God the things that are God%u2019s.%u201D This is what I believe, now BACK UP YOUR STATEMENT ABOUT THESE AFFAIR(S)! Stop trying to run especially when you have the nerve to say something so ugly about another person without proof! KITTYKATT2, BACK WHAT YOU ARE ACCUSING ANOTHER PERSON OF BY PROVIDIN PROOF, BACK IT UP WITH FACTS!!!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- Kittykatty2, do you actually believe what you write?? I''m asking you to prove what your stated about another human being and you should be able to back it up with proof, of course, unless you don''t have proof and I know you don''t because if it was so, the media would be on it like white on rice, so bottomline, you don''t have proof and as always, you throw something out to hurt someone and when someone calls you on it, you state something else and then you resent the fact that I am trying to get you to stay on the accusation that you have made but you don''t want to discuss that. Ask for paying taxes, hey, read the Bible, what does Jesus say: %u201CRender unto Caesar the things which are Caesar%u2019s, and unto God the things that are God%u2019s.%u201D This is what I believe, now BACK UP YOUR STATEMENT ABOUT THESE AFFAIR(S)! Stop trying to run especially when you have the nerve to say something so ugly about another person without proof! KITTYKATT2, BACK WHAT YOU ARE ACCUSING ANOTHER PERSON OF BY PROVIDIN PROOF, BACK IT UP WITH FACTS!!!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- Nancy Naive, the wingnuts are the ones that want to redefine Marriage. As far back as time goes and all across the planet, marriage has always been between a man and woman. The radicals are the ones that want to change that. Idiot Judges that legislate from the bench. That doesn''t mean that *** shouldn''t have rights or respect. Just not marriage.
- Reply to this comment
- seriously an iq test shoudl be required in able to be eligible to vote.
I WAS NOT ABUSED BY MY FATHER IN ANY WAY!
oh and which commandment stated "judge thy neighbor?" - Reply to this comment
- "First of all gayss arent born gayss. Their father neglect them and then they are abused and become gayss. Secondly a man who thinks he"s a woman and vice-versa has a serious mental disease and should receive free mental treatment from the government so they can get back their own gender instead of more and more rights.Period. "
tsk tsk tsk sarah lover, this is why we have an educational system in America. But it seems as though ignorance is a comfortable state for you. While you''re out there thinking you know why people are gay, make sure you do some protesting of blacks being able to own land...or better yet, women having the right to vote. Prejudice/racism is disgusting and ignorant and I feel the utmost shame and pity for you. Knowing what you know about father''s neglect being the reason why someone would be gay must mean you''ve spoken to every single homesexual out there. How do you have time to pee? - Reply to this comment