You now how mobs are, sooner or later they become out of control, irrational and out for blood. McCain and Palin fueled them, McCain allowed the dirty Rovian tacktics of Bush/Cheney to advise him on dirty misleading campaigning and now McCain''s lost control.
They will turn and if that''s not apparent that the are out for a "lynching" metaphorically of Obama personally, they have and will turn on McCain for not pulling the rope.
his is funny-- Within the past 6 weeks--McCain made Republicans embrace a former mistress as potential first lady, illegitimate teen pregnancy, an Airhead for a VP and now they must embrace socialism and helping out the poor with a 300+ billion dollar mortgage bailout--before its over, the Republican party will seem more liberal than the Democrats and the Republicans have to swallow it--because he is all that they have.
Paying for a public bailout,ignoring subpoenas, then supporting airhead females for VP and championing pregger teens indeed--what were those conservative values again? Hypocrites.
Sarah Palin and John McCain have lost all moral authority and moral compass. They are close to inciting riots (and there are indeed laws against that) at their campaign rallies, where they clearly succeed in only one thing--character assassination and lying that leads their die-hard extremist fans to conclude that a respected U.S. Senator is a terrorist. Shouts are heard at these rallies that suggest lynch mobs and mob rule--"Kill him!" their crowd shouts, and "Terrorist!"
Shame on you, Sarah, shame on you, John. There is a special circle of hell reserved for those guilty of calumny and slander. Your candidacies have lost all credibility and relevance, and you have become dangerous terrorists yourselves.
Vote for John McCain!! He is the one who can come up with solutions to our economic problems.
Posted by PugHenry3 at 11:11 AM : Oct 09, 2008
Since even McCain himself has admitted that he doesn''t know much about economics and since he has (until only the past month or so) generally been champion of the deregulation ploices that got us into this mess, I''ll have to say ''Thanks, but no thanks.''
You at least know that John McCain has the computational and analytic skills to compute fuel loads, cargo weights, wind speeds, and trip distances to keep from running out of gas on missions.
heartlandjim said:"I''''''''m not going to give you any cute comments here; we simply need a major change. I''''''''m a Republican voting for Obama."
Yeah right . . . and I''''m the king of Siam.
Posted by rplat at 10:47 AM : Oct 09, 2008
Why do you refuse to you believe this poster? Do you find it soooo hard to believe that there are many Republicans who would rather vote for Obama?
Dr. Tantillo, who has a marketing blog - http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv - did a post a while back on the Obama/Biden brands and the McCain/Palin brands. He argued that McCain''s choice of VP now makes him, rather than Obama, the candidate of Change: "Brands are combined for two reasons: 1) To complement one another; and/or 2) Because they are consistent with one another. The best brand combinations are when both 1 and 2 are happening. Seems to me like their common brand is being ''maverick'' in a vague way for uncertain reasons and being largely out of touch. But hey, I suppose at least they''re a good match!
Tantillo''s full post: http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/09/05/brand-winners-and-losers.aspx
Dr. Tantillo, who has a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv" a marketing blog /a , did a post a while back on the Obama/Biden brands and the McCain/Palin brands.
He argued that McCain''s choice of VP now makes him, rather than Obama, the candidate of Change:
"Brands are combined for two reasons: 1) To complement one another; and/or 2) Because they are consistent with one another. The best brand combinations are when both 1 and 2 are happening.
Seems to me like their common brand is being ''maverick'' in a vague way for uncertain reasons and being largely out of touch. But hey, I suppose at least they''re a good match!
a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/09/05/brand-winners-and-losers.aspx" Tantillo''s full post /a
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Reply to Comment The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
They will turn and if that''s not apparent that the are out for a "lynching" metaphorically of Obama personally, they have and will turn on McCain for not pulling the rope.
Paying for a public bailout,ignoring subpoenas, then supporting airhead females for VP and championing pregger teens indeed--what were those conservative values again? Hypocrites.
Shame on you, Sarah, shame on you, John. There is a special circle of hell reserved for those guilty of calumny and slander. Your candidacies have lost all credibility and relevance, and you have become dangerous terrorists yourselves.
Posted by PugHenry3 at 11:11 AM : Oct 09, 2008
Since even McCain himself has admitted that he doesn''t know much about economics and since he has (until only the past month or so) generally been champion of the deregulation ploices that got us into this mess, I''ll have to say ''Thanks, but no thanks.''
Posted by PugHenry3 at 11:09 AM : Oct 09, 2008
Really? Is THAT why he crashed 5 planes?
Yeah right . . . and I''''m the king of Siam.
Posted by rplat at 10:47 AM : Oct 09, 2008
Why do you refuse to you believe this poster? Do you find it soooo hard to believe that there are many Republicans who would rather vote for Obama?
If so, you''re due for a wake-up call.
Check out www.republicansforobama.org
Also:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article1752381.ece
http://www.nypost.com/seven/06072007/entertainment/turning_their_barack_on_gop_entertainment_maureen_callahan.htm?page=0
http://www.suntimes.com/news/hunter/433292,CST-NWS-hunter19.article
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/columnists/zito/s_550427.html
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-gopobama25feb25,0,1768618.story
He argued that McCain''s choice of VP now makes him, rather than Obama, the candidate of Change:
"Brands are combined for two reasons:
1) To complement one another;
and/or
2) Because they are consistent with one another.
The best brand combinations are when both 1 and 2 are happening.
Seems to me like their common brand is being ''maverick'' in a vague way for uncertain reasons and being largely out of touch. But hey, I suppose at least they''re a good match!
Tantillo''s full post: http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/09/05/brand-winners-and-losers.aspx
He argued that McCain''s choice of VP now makes him, rather than Obama, the candidate of Change:
"Brands are combined for two reasons:
1) To complement one another;
and/or
2) Because they are consistent with one another.
The best brand combinations are when both 1 and 2 are happening.
Seems to me like their common brand is being ''maverick'' in a vague way for uncertain reasons and being largely out of touch. But hey, I suppose at least they''re a good match!
a href="http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/09/05/brand-winners-and-losers.aspx" Tantillo''s full post /a