Comments on: Obama OKs Donors To Help Clinton With Campaign Debt

[credibility2]

This is the least he can do for her at this point. Besides, she''s going out of her way to get her major donors to support him. Fair is fair.

[jack3213]

A "Dummocrat" isn''t better -for the WhiteHouse than - a Rebuplican, as some would think. Would you rather have someone who puts this country at risk, raise you taxes, makes you promises that can never be delivered, make you feel and look like a fool? That would happen with a LIBERAL. You are all fools for believing Obama. God help you.

[rowdywicca]

Posted by toldyouso12 at 10:20 AM : Jun 25, 2008

LMAO! B-easy''s back.

But that''s neither here nor there.

Hillary Clinton should be telling Barak Obama to go out and hunt under rocks for votes! But unfortunately the DNC with the help of Obama threatened her career if she did.

Go Hillary! 2012!!!!

[michael0004]

Also, the headline to The CBS story is also deceptive. Obama is not giving Clinton anything. Obama''s supporters are looking for Obama''s blessing for them to donate money to Clinton. They asked Obama. Obama did not ask them. And Obama has not asked anyone here or anywhere else to contribute to Hillary. All this complaining here by Obama supporters is just a bunch of hot air with no basis in fact.

[nanc12]

All that hard-earned cash from contributors ($10 million) to the Obama campaign - WASTED on that shrill Hillary Clinton Posted by One-American

This CBS story is poorly worded. Obama is not giving her any of his contributions. According to FEC law, he is barred from doing that. He can participate in fundraisers and ask his donors to give money to her, but he can not just hand over cash from his contributors.

[one-american]

All that hard-earned cash from contributors ($10 million) to the Obama campaign - WASTED on that shrill Hillary Clinton - must make Obama supporters angry.

Obama is sure great at throwing your money around.

Just imagine if he gets elected how much he will waste!

[toldyouso12]

It turns out that anyone who follows any person to the point of messianic worship and is willing to overthrow their party in the name of their tantrum--really is just another name for a neo con.

Racist Democrats did the same when the Democrats embraced civil rights (they flocked to the Republican party, where they could remain racist)

Reagan Dems did the same, when they decided that they were in it for themselves and wanted to help no one except their own pockets (usually called self centered azzholes--but again, they are celebrities and the norm in the Republican party.

Now many HRC supporters claim they will do the same. Do it. Stop Whining and do it. And if you are not at your maximum donations and cannot send HRC at least 20.00 to bail out the campaign that most of you egged her on to keep going--you are a fraud and a liar.

HRC needs your support now, more than ever. She may not be able to win and be your President but if you really support her, then you realize her run was often at all or your behests...the least you could do is help her pay the outstanding bills for that run.

Unless you are Reagan Democrats. We don''t expect that bunch to try to help anyone except themselves. LMAO

[libra127]

If all of this goes over your head--BITE ME. It means the same thing in "Deciphering the nuance of linguistics for HRC Dummies"

Posted by toldyouso12 at 10:09 AM : Jun 25, 2008

So EXACTLY like b-easy63. So pointless, so stupid, so insulting. You call me both a "neocon" and a "HRC Dummy" in the same post, knowing nothing about me except that I do not think highly of b-easy. Deep thinker, you are. Get a life of your own.

[toldyouso12]

What''''s the matter, can''''t you think for yourself? Your style is so much like b-easy''''s that you should be embarrassed and ashamed. Try thinking for yourself for a change.

Posted by libra127 at 10:04 AM : Jun 25, 2008

I make no bones about knowing who b-easy is personally and in emulating her. I take that as a backhanded compliment as she is one of the most intelligent and fair minded people I know--though lately she has been talking about that need for unity craaap and come close to heresy in trying to find some good in Hillary. But I just think she was having an off day, when she said all of that. LOL

As for whether I am her clone--so what? Imitation is the greatest form of flattery--you don''t see me lambasting your for your being a clone of a neo con, now do you? We all have to aim for as high as our attributes can take us--so we know you only are doing your best.

If all of this goes over your head--BITE ME. It means the same thing in "Deciphering the nuance of linguistics for HRC Dummies" LMAO

[texanforlogi]

don''''t see ANY solutions in politics, no messiahs, no easy fixes. Not until Americans begin to take responsibility and take this country back from corporate greed and political pandering, and lies, distortion, greed, self-serving priorities, etc. etc. on the part of all those with power - the people have the real power, if they would simply realize it and come together and use it. I only pray it will be in the model of Gandhi rather than riots and violence. I would prefer to preempt anarchy with organized, grass roots unity of the common man and woman to take back the reins of this country. We could do it, if only we would.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by cryhavoc2 at 10:08 AM : Jun 25, 2008

Excellent post! I agree.