Comments on: Bill Clinton Blames “Slanted Press Coverage” for Obama's Delegate Lead

[bajaan]

The findings raise new questions about the Christian views of Obama,

Posted by hinnis at 11:18 PM : May 20, 2008
_________________

Learn how to say: Barack Hussein Obama. And when you say it, keep in mind that "Hussein" means "blessed" in Arabic. Allahu akbar al-hamdulilah la ilaha illa Llah Muhammadun rasulu''Llah. Now your country will have the proper guidance.

There have been some sexist comments by the media. But this is the same media then spent most of April looping Rev. Wright.
The Clinton''s should be happy. The media could have spent April on the Peter Paul story. (I will do the courtesey of not posting it here)

And no Bill, nobody "on Television told West Virginians to stay at home" That is a fabrication.

[cbsblogger]

Perhaps Clinton was not getting the positive coverage because the press is as sick of the Bush -Clinton dynasties in the Whitehouse as many Americans are.

[harrydoghiny]

Hey Bill. Call the WAAAAmbulance...

[foenoone]

Whether you love or hate the Clintons it is UNDENIABLE that alot of the political commentators, left AND right, have been shafting Hillary and her campaign for the last few months. People that I usually pay attention to like Olberman, Chris Matthews, and Tim Russert turned out to be huge a-holes when it came to ''commentating'' on Hillary. If you don''t see that, your totally blind. Why did this happen? In my opinion...d*ck fear. These guys were so rubbed the wrong way by a woman seeking the office of president they acted like a bunch of neanderthal, knuckle-dragging jocks. I used to really admire all of these guys, but after this election it''s clear that the media-bots on the both sides are capable of dumb a$$ shenanigans. Hillary may have made some mistakes in her campaign, but overall she got f''ing TRASHED by the media, specifically by the arrogant self serving frat boys that deliver the news every night. "Good night and good luck" my ***. Couldn''t think of your own tag line...KEITH?

[hinnis]

White Christians are "make pretend" believers and conservative Christians emulate the people who killed Jesus, according to articles in a controversial magazine run by Sen. Barack Obama''s longtime pastor that paint traditional Christianity as false and racist.

Stanley Kurtz, a National Review Online contributor, concluded after reviewing two years of Rev. Jeremiah Wright''s Trumpet Magazine that the Trinity United Church of Christ pastor practices a black liberation theology brand of Christianity that "sees his own form of Christianity as profoundly different from Christianity as typically practiced by most American whites and blacks."

The findings raise new questions about the Christian views of Obama, a longtime Trinity member who was featured on Trumpet magazine''s cover several times and last year granted an exclusive, lengthy interview to the publication.

[erichsh]

makeitso928, so do you advocate that Keith Olbermann be forced to provide airtime to conservatives? Or that Rush Limbaugh''s show be outlawed because he doesn''t give sufficient airtime to liberals? You adopt a very idealistic position, but just how do you go about enforcing it?

There are already shows like the kind you advocate - the McLaughlin Group comes to mind - but these usually degenerate into episodes of heads talking over and past each other, not engaging in civil discourse. Right now, people have the power to choose their own stations and shows without having some government-imposed mandate of "fairness" shoved down their throats.

How can you reconcile the traditional liberal advocacy of freedom of speech with some government-defined, legally imposed doctrine of "fairness"?

[veteran72]

Wasn''''t it Billy Boy who said "You don''''t hear us complaining about the press" a few weeks ago?

And the "If you can''''t stand the heat " line from Hillary?

Do they EVER take responsibilty for their own actions and shotcomings?
-----------------------------------
Posted by mydogdylan6 at 10:48 PM : May 20, 2008
+ report abuse


Why no,...no they don''t......LMMFAO

[hinnis]

Obama has developed a strategy to con Hillary supporters into voting for him using various ploys, including: 1. The "Supreme Court" card, i.e. if Obama doesn''t win, McCain will appoint conservative judges. 2. The "Roe v. Wade" card, i.e. if Obama doesn''t win, the Supreme Court will overturn Roe v. Wade. 3. The "race card,", i.e. if you are against Obama, then you are a racist. 4. The "real Democrat" card, i.e. "real Democrats" will vote for the Democratic nominee whether they like him or not. 5. The "Hillary would want you to vote for Obama" card, which is self-explanatory.
Obama, his supporters, the DNC, the party elite, and the mainstream media have conspired to marginalize the millions of Democrats who have voted for Hillary, and they will now be using every trick in the book to "bring the party together" to further their ruthless ambitions. They will want you to forget all about the months of biased press, the biased party elite, the insults, and the race-cards. They will want you to forget that the Democratic Party now is the party that stands for disenfranchisement and the rationalization of racism. They will use any method to persuade you to vote for the man who they have preordained as the Democratic nominee. DON''T FALL FOR IT!

Whether you write-in Hillary, if possible, vote for John McCain, or sit out the election, remember that your action or inaction could result in the election of the inexperienced, deceptive, ruthless and divisive Obama.

[Lai K W]

Misrepresentation of people''s opinion are on TV coverage. Look at the results as follow:

Comparison of Texas caucus and primary:

Texa Primary
Candidate Votes Vote% P.Deleg
Clinton 1,459,814 51% 65
Obama 1,358,785 47% 61
4 points win to Clinton in primary

Texa Caucus
Candidate Votes Vote% P.Deleg
Obama 23,918 56% 38
Clinton 18,620 44% 29
12 points loss to Clinton in caucus

Comparison of Washington Caucus and Primary:

Washington
Candidate Votes Vote% P.Deleg
Obama 21,629 68% 59
Clinton 9,992 31% 31
37 points win of Obama incaucas

Washington Primary
Candidate Votes Vote% P.Deleg
Obama 339,166 51%
Clinton 303,151 46%
6 points win of Obama in primary

Comparison of Alaska and Virginia
Alaska
Candidate Votes Vote% P.Deleg
Obama 6,674 75% 9
Clinton 2,194 25% 4
A win of 4480 votes
A win of 5 pledged delegates

West Virginia
Candidate Votes Vote% P.Deleg
Clinton 239,298 67% 20
Obama 91,747 26% 8
A win of 147551 votes
A win of 12 pledged delegates

It is just like the animal farm in George Orwell.
All votes are equal: just some votes are more equal than the others.

Thre are actually more Hillary supporters than being counted. There are less OBAMA supporters.