Comments on: Clinton Reminds Viewers: Journalist Was Once on Her Side

[kenbomc]

kmb08 at 01:42 PM : May 04, 2008;

Yeah and I''m sure your sister is the brightest bulb of the bunch right? There is a nomination fight still going on. McSame will have his fair share and then some -you can bet on that. There is no way americans will vote a Bush protege into office.

[txgrouch2004]

The NERVE of that guy!

How DARE he say that the Evil Queen HAS NO CLOTHES....

HILLARY CAN''T BE TRUSTED.

HILLARY MUST GO.

[kenbomc]

Posted by kmb08 at 01:47 PM : May 04, 2008;

Nobody is touching that because it could harm both parties -and undermine this election. What they did was illegal, and people associated with Hillary like her managers at the time wil be blamed (by Hillary).

[twotraps]

psy-war, Fortunately those Catholics are not running for president. We could hang''em all in a quick trial, put it on pay-per-view, give the cash to the victims...after they shake down the Vatican for as much as possible in a very public, ugly trial that costs them hundreds of millions of dollars.

Hillary still needs to be questioned about her trial. Eventually, all the misspeaking and missremembering catches up to you.

[twotraps]

kmb08, if there was nothing to it, there would be no trial.

The media grasps at anything to scrutinize the candidates....and they deserve the scrutiny. I don''t support Obama, and McCain is does little to inspire. My point is that a trial involving a candidate is about to start and it is not reported in the media.

Hillary knows people watch 10 mins of CNN and that soundbites can make or break her. She is a superior campaign and politican for that matter. Again...when will someone at least ASK her about it public?

[kmb08]

twotraps..

As far as the fraud trial....I suppose you''re speaking about the P. Paul ordeal?? That is a continuation of the trial Mr. Paul tried to initiate years ago, and it was discredited then, and will be discredited again. The matter has been looked into, and the conclusion was: The Clinton''s did everything legally. This is why it isn''t being reported on. It''s a joke!!

[kmb08]

If the Obama supporters would like to do a bit of research, you''ll find that Obama has misled more in his campaign ads. Do you all think he''s a liar as well? If you call Hillary one, how can you not think the same of Obama?

p I can''t believe the Obama supporters think Hillary has run a negative campaign. She has had to tiptoe around issues because his supporters cry racism as often as they can, so the campaign has been softball at best.

p My sister, a staunch Republican, thinks Obama will be the easiest candidate to beat in the fall. She''s read too much about Obama that hasn''t been aired by the media, and she says, it''s all gonna come out in the general, you can be for sure.

[twotraps]

to notthequiet....Hillary is going to testify, after the election, in a trial for campaign fraud during her senatorial campaign. Look it up.

Obama''s pastor is nuts for sure and its makes us question the candidates character. I totally agree with the scrutiny, we need to see how these people think!

When a candidate has been ordered to testify in a fraud case....we can question her about it. Its public record...its out there and not one reporter has asked her about it. Not a drop of scrutiny.

Have we lost the plot?

[kmb08]

Hillary did well on the show. I knew George would hit her hard because he took such a hit for finally asking Obama some tough questions in the last debate. Sure enough, George would interrupt Hillary as she was formulating her thoughts, but that''s okay...she can take it. There was nothing wrong with Hillary pointing out that she and George were on the same team once, and that he knew she had reservations pertaining to Nafta. David Gergen corroborated her position on this as well. Hillary was telling the complete truth.

p On MTP, Tim Russert avoided asking Obama any tough questions, and normally, Tim will refer to video clips pinning the guest down, but he never showed the video clips of Obama saying he thought George Bush was handling the Iraq war well, he never showed the clips of Obama stating he didn''t know how he would have voted on the Iraq war resolution had he been in the Senate at the time, he never showed clips of Obama saying he supported Kerry''s vote on the war resolution, eventhough, Obama has staked much of his campaign on being "firm" about his Iraq position. It was like a friendly conversation between the two.


HRC''08

[memekiller]

What I love about what Hillary is doing here is she''s demonstrating beyond all doubt that George is playing dumb, deliberately passsing along questions he knows from FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE are total lies. He feels more obligation to not appear liberal than he does to inform his viewers.

George was THERE when Hillary opposed NAFTA (as David Gergen, as reliable a commentator there is, attested, attested, having felt some obligation to the truth).

So here''s the question: What is wrong with journalism that George feels absolutely no duty to tell the truth? How have journalists come to feel no guilt about lying to us?