Add a Comment See all 188 Comments
by nancyn5 April 15, 2008 3:46 PM EDT
Here''s my confusion:
Why is no one asking either Clinton or Obama what the net benefit to the US is of opening up NAFTA? Under NAFTA, Americans have PROTECTED access to Canadian energy supplies. Don''t you think the Canadian government, challenged by a US president to open the agreement, would suggest that now everything is on the table? The Democratic candidates know this all too well, but continue to pander to the uninformed electorate. Tell the truth: opening up NAFTA would be the most foolish thing America could do...the most foolish.
Reply to this comment
by gunshack1 April 15, 2008 3:45 PM EDT
Bitter, why would I be bitter. My 401K is in the tolet, my company canceled my health insurance and moved my job to Mexico, gas is $3.50 a gal., My house value has dropped 25% and my president has developed myopia. Other than that, things are great.
Reply to this comment
by msemper April 15, 2008 3:42 PM EDT
Hillary is forcing votes to make a choice. However she is poeple aganist her.
Reply to this comment
by szelag19 April 15, 2008 3:36 PM EDT
It sounds like to me they were just people looking to eat and nothing else..who paid for the food? Was it Hillary''s campaign or was it a contributor dinner..either way they sound like
a bunch of hongry mofo''s
Reply to this comment
by annie710 April 15, 2008 3:34 PM EDT
Just remember the trogan horse trick what exactly is hillary and obama going to do ange what kind of change are they going to make and what is it going to cost & who is going to pay for it since nothing is free one guess. are we safer with bush yes if we are not safe no change is going to mean anything I for one don''t want to live in fear every day like israel.I don''t trust either obama or hillary as far as I could throw them.
Reply to this comment
by susanel28 April 15, 2008 3:31 PM EDT
So it appears that Obama''s people are now actively disrupting her speeches.
Reply to this comment
by xlib April 15, 2008 3:26 PM EDT
libra127-partly, you got it. So, nothing happened before 1/20/01??
Reply to this comment
by nancyn5 April 15, 2008 3:25 PM EDT
Here''s my confusion:
Why is no one asking either Clinton or Obama what the net benefit to the US is of opening up NAFTA? Under NAFTA, Americans have PROTECTED access to Canadian energy supplies. Don''t you think the Canadian government, challenged by a US president to open the agreement, would suggest that now everything is on the table? The Democratic candidates know this all too well, but continue to pander to the uninformed electorate. Tell the truth: opening up NAFTA would be the most foolish thing America could do...the most foolish.
Reply to this comment
by xlib April 15, 2008 3:24 PM EDT
cbulcom & mcvet-why how very, very enlightened of you both. So, I guess you wouldn''t have a problem with a Mormom, right??
Reply to this comment
by xlib April 15, 2008 3:22 PM EDT
neonink-funny but it seems bubba put out an order to take binLaden out in 1998 but it failed, so why would he do that?? Also, I do remember videos of binLaden declaring outright war on the West. And I do remember bubba pointing that bony finger of his at Chris Wallace declaring "I tried (bite lower lip)to take binLaden, no one has tried harder than me". Don''t you remember??? Still 8 years of terror strikes and terror build up compared to 8 months. Do the math.
To say that terrorism only began 1/20/01 and nothing that happened before counts is just being blind.
By the way, I thought you libs didn''t believe in terrorism, just global warming. HUH!
Reply to this comment
See all 188 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

About From The Road

Description for From the Road