Comments on: Despite Differing Views on Trade, Hillary Vows Not To Muzzle Bill

[sueb451]

When you market yourself as ''two-for-one'' (which the Clintons have always done), how can you blame people for wondering who''ll be making the decisions. Take the Colombia trade deal. Bill was paid $800,000 to promote the trade deal which (since they file joint tax returns) presumably benefits them both. Hillary is against the deal and she says how disappointed she is that Bush has submitted the trade deal for a vote now. Is this because now she has to vote on it before the nomination is decided? The problem with the Clintons is you never know what''s true.

[hp32970c]

So he accepted money from the Colombian government to promote the free trade bill? And where exactly would he be doing that promoting?? Could it be to his wife the president?? It''s such blatant conflict of interest. Why couldn''t he turn down that money since his wife is running for pres? It''s not like they haven''t enough of it.

[sgtrds]

Why should she? He has a complete right to free speech just like anyone else.

[thisandthat1]

She''s not going to muzzle him, but she didn''t say anything about not fitting him for a chastity belt!

[stirg]

Honestly, do any one of you actually know anything about the trade bill pending? Truthfully you know more about making paper airplanes, so lets just go with where hillary stands on the columbian trade bill-against-no one else in this story is running for your president

[stn_sage]

There was a time when as much as I didn''t personally like the Clintons, I thought they were reasonable as political leaders in America---but their behavior following the end of his presidency through today has been despicable!

Her word is as dependable as a $3 dollar bill is spendable! That is, NOT REALLY!

[shutupnvote]

More than 45,000 blacks signed up to vote in the first three months of 2008, compared with just over 11,000 in the first three months of 2004. White voter registration more than doubled with 106,000 new registrations between Jan. 1 and March 31, compared with 47,000 four years ago.

Blacks have historically accounted for about one-third of voters in North Carolina''s Democratic primary. Obama has won a string of Southern primaries and caucuses in states with a large share of black voters.


...

[mrtutto]

There they go again..... to make her look tough,Bill lets her wag his tail. Reminds me of the cheating husband who gets caught and if the wife doesn''t leave him, he is forever in the dog house. Obviously if she disagrees with him now....surely she disagreed with him when he passed NAFTA. That is total bull. I have seen at least 3 videos where she is supporting NAFTA. Now she is losing because Obama is outspending her. He has the money. Regular people have given to his campaign. Look at Hillary..... she has to get money from Elton John. By the way foreign nationals are forbidden to give money to a campaign either directly or indirectly..... So Hillary is breaking the law... Does she care ? probably not.

[blackspirit3]

You muzzle a dog, but this is the same dog that leap yards and go hump other B-----. Hillar you wnat my vote, or my respect, dump that trash and be a queen.

[kate1149]

Hillary Clinton''s biggest negative has always been her marriage to Bill Clinton. How can anyone think that these two should be back in the White House? The couple earned millions of dollars together over the last 8 years from Bill Clinton''s influence peddling on issues which Hillary Clinton claims in public not to support. It is a huge conflict of interest to say you are against something in public so you can get elected, and then take money from the group that supports the issues you are claiming not to support. It is not about Bill being able to voice his opinions, it is about taking money from groups that you claim to be working against. Quite a racket the Clinton''s have going.