Comments on: McCain Irked by Questions About 2004 Veep Talks

[homjett]

This is really a non story, I watched the video, an it was just a case of a NYT Reporter trying to ruffle his feathers, trying for another GOTCHA moment. Was this a case of the MSM trying to make McCain look bad just to draw attention away from the disgusting tactics by their two Candidates??? Would these Reporters time be better spent asking questions like what McCain would do about the gas prices, why we cannot drill more, more refinery''s.

[cdfoxtrot]

I am in agreement with McCain going off on this reporter. Why shouldn''''''''t he be allowed to jump in her face? Who says having a temper is a bad thing?

Better than being a complacent Democrat President who''''''''d bend over and take it up the backside if the country is attacked

Posted by TheGateway1

The world doesn''t need a hot-head in charge of the world''s largest nuclear arsenal. That''s why having a temper is not good if you''re the prez.

As I recall, the US took it up the backside on 9/11 and after, and that was with a Repiglican in the WH, and a Repiglican controlled House and Senate. Instead of going after the perpetrators of 9/11, they embarked on the Israel-lobby motivated illegal war. Let me guess: you support that too??

[singingrick]

Better than being a complacent Democrat President who''''''''d bend over and take it up the backside if the country is attacked

Posted by TheGateway1 at 06:32 PM : Mar 07, 2008


You mean like Bush did with Bin Laden?

Hey, you find those WMD''s yet?

No?

Keep looking.

lol!

[gracchus1]

By no means am I defending the media because we all knwo that reporters can be obnoxious. At the same time, what if McCain is at a press conference and loses his cool. Even members of his own staff publicly have noted that at times he can be a bit of a loose cannon when he gets angry. Not good.

That was a temper?? You''ve got to be kidding me. He was almost to Mitt Romney''s (non)-"Temper" shown on the discussion on lobbyists. The press is really, really reaching on this one.

[rrcampbell11]

This supposed foreign policy expert is indeed Senator Hothead.

Just what we need for world diplomacy. (not!)

Elisabeth Bumiller was right to ask "Why are you so angry?"

The American people and foreign leaders will not want to ask this about their leader.

Presumptive nominee, maybe, pompous ***, yes.

[walt1944-2009]

John "the Great Pretender" McCain is displeased that reporters are quizzing him about who his running mate will be.

Showing the temper he is famous for, McCain was more than "testy" with reporters about the subject, especially when a talk he had with John Kerry 3 years ago was brought up!

McCain, aside from having a reputation as a "testy" person, also has a reputation of being an idiot and making stupid decisions that come back to hurt and haunt him later if not sooner (something like the current Great Emperor!).

Assuming Kerry would accept, which would be totally mind-blowing itself, making Kerry his running mate would mean a Democratic "landslide" in November, with every neocon Fascist Nazi Republican refusing to vote! The Democrats would be free to nominate their mascot, "Frances, the Talking Mule" to run against McCain, and the mule would WIN!!!!!

SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!
sig heil, McCain????

[soldat44]

Typical NY Times BS...

[cdfoxtrot]

If McOldGuy gets so testy over such a trivial matter, how''s he going to react at being woken up for that "3 am phone call" they keep talking about? He''s too old and crabby for this position.

[jimmb4]

My friends. Let''s have another war.