Comments on: Romney To Huckabee: "No Whining"
Add a Comment See all 181 Comments
- bshaddock. Your point? Do you seriously want a President who never reconsiders a position, one who is so full of personal hubris as to assume he is always right or always has the correct solution in a dynamic and ever changing world?
- Reply to this comment
- WOW! WHO DO THE LADIES LIKE FOR 2008?
POLITCO, SPONSOR FOR THE CALIFORNIA GOP DEBATE DID A BEFORE AND AFTER POLL. A GROUP OF VARIOUS WOMEN WERE ASKED WHO THEY LIKED BEFORE THE DEBATE AND THEN WHO THEY DID AFTER.
THEY WERE ISOLATED WITH NO INSIGHT FROM MEDIA OR COMMENTATOR, THEY WATCHED SUBJECTIVELY.
WHO DO THE LADIES LOVE?
WATCH HERE: (COPY AND PASTE TO YOUR BROWSER IF YOU NEED TO)
http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1155201977/bctid1399221378
AFTER YOU WATCH THIS EMAIL IT TO ALL OF YOUR FRIENDS. - Reply to this comment
- Immigration reform
"With these 11 million people [here illegally], let''s have them registered, know who they are....those that are here paying taxes and not taking government benefits should begin a process towards application for citizenship."
Lowell Sun, 3/30/06
"One simple rule: no amnesty.If that [Kennedy-McCain bill] is not a form of amnesty, I don''t know what is."
New York Times, 6/4/07 - Reply to this comment
- Abortion rights
"I will preserve and protect a woman''s right to choose and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard."
Boston Herald Debate, 10/29/02
"Roe v. Wade continues to work its destructive logic throughout our society This can''t continue."
Speech to the Massachusetts Citizens For Life Mother''s Day Pioneer Valley Dinner, 5/10/07 - Reply to this comment
- Stem cell research
[Romney]endorsed embryonic stem cell research, saying the controversial science might one day help treat his wife''s multiple sclerosis...."I am in favor of stem cell research. I will work and fight for stem cell research. I''d be happy to talk to [President Bush] about this, though I don''t know if I could budge him an inch."
Boston Globe, 6/14/02
"FACT: Governor Romney Opposes Using Taxpayer Money to Fund Embryo-Destructive Research."
MittRomney.com A Record of Protecting Life - Reply to this comment
- Hey folks, it''s JUAN McCain. He has adopted the spelling as a result of his despicable association with the MEXICO FIRST advisor on his campaign: Juan Hernandez. (You know, that obnoxious, rude, arrogant pig that argues with Hannity on his show sometimes.) He and Juan McCain are 2 peas in a pod, they believe the same things for our sovereignity and our borders.
- Reply to this comment
- hoosiertide, it''s ridiculous to think that a $5 million business could make someone $95 million in 3 years all in the process destroying itself. Come on! Get a reality check here.
For one thing, no business that could make that kind of money would ever sell for $5 million. Now if it did, then REALLY, WE DO NEED ROMNEY TO GET US OUT OF OUR INDEBTED POSITION AND BECOME PROFITABLE LIKE THAT COMPANY.
You''re making my point here. VOTE ROMNEY! - Reply to this comment
- Bottom line, folks---You can bury your heads in the sand and refuse to see the handwriting on the wall if you want to. You can write hateful comments, skewed "facts" to make your case, and you can even declare your candidate to be the better Christian or more honest campaigner. But, when the dust settles and the votes are counted, unless you pull this together, Mr. John McCain will be the nominee for the Republican Party. Mitt Romney is the only candidate in the contest who has a fighting chance to keep that from happening. Huckabee and Paul supporters have got to get behind the only candidate that can stop the McCain nomination and stop the bickering! Divided we fall--United we stand!! Come On folks!!!
- Reply to this comment
- Grabbag:
"last debate Huckabee got 11 minutes, Romney got 22 minutes to speak)."
Ummmmmmm.......Because they know that Huckabee (and Paul who got even less time) have NO CHANCE of winning based on their delegate counts and support.
Therefore, they wanted to make sure that citizens were able to hear as much as possible from the only "realistic" two candidates representing the Republicans. - Reply to this comment
- hoosiertide, yeah, and it was all from the failure of Ampad. LOL
Pretty good deal then if he only paid $5 million for it. LOL - Reply to this comment
- REPUBLICANS FOR HILLARY (that is, if Juan McCain is the nominee!)
grabbag: I''d be a big boy and not whine about it. - Reply to this comment
- perhaps I am thinking of the fact that Huckabee has not been a CONSERVATIVE for long. He was a liberal republican, and really, still is.
- Reply to this comment
- Comment to Huckamonkey: Free speech yes; lies and half truths, no. Imagine for a second that you were running for president and that you had opponants; political and media who didn''t like you, cutting you down, and or deliberately ignoring you (last debate Huckabee got 11 minutes, Romney got 22 minutes to speak) How would you feel then?
- Reply to this comment
- Comment to Huckamonkey: Free speech yes; lies and half truths, no. Imagine for a second that you were running for president and that you had opponants; political and media who didn''t like you, cutting you down, and or deliberately ignoring you (last debate Huckabee got 11 minutes, Romney got 22 minutes to speak) How would you feel then?
- Reply to this comment
- does anyone know when Huckabee became a republican? I don''t think it was long ago. Anybody know?
- Reply to this comment
- Is it advisable to support any candidate who would reverse course and sacrifice the impressive gains against Islamofacists that young Americans have shed their precious blood to achieve? The fact that we have not experienced another 9/11 is not a by-chance occurrence. Further, it''s critical to appreciate the pivotal role that our own border security plays in our "war against terrorism", keeping in mind that "Amnesty" is anathema to border security. A Nation without enforceable borders will not long survive as a Nation. Mitt Romney is exceedingly strong on each of these principles; while his opponent, John McCain, has proven that illegal immigration is an issue on which he can NOT be trusted. Don''t be misled by McCain''s "Clintonian-Lies" concerning Romney''s record.
Greg Neubeck - Reply to this comment
- Aimie2 - romney''s company made $95 million in just over three years. how much more of a profit could he make?! the shareholders made zero.
http://www.massresistance.org/romney/ampad_062607/index.html - Reply to this comment
- HOOSIERTIDE Romney has said that some of the businesses he tried to revive worked out, some did not. That doesn''t mean that he purposely made them fail. It''s just life, some things work, some don''t.
At least Romney has learned from his mistakes and has had many successes. On the other hand, if we get Juan McCain or Huck or Hillary or Obama in there, who have had ZERO business experience, maybe America will be the one failure for them (like Romney had a few in his career). Do we want to take that chance?
Al Qaeda would love to see us elect an economic moron, since they would love to destroy us economically (they have STATED THIS). Al Qaeda wouldn''t even have to do any work then. - Reply to this comment
- Grab Bag:
Or is it whining *********? Get thee to a nunnery little virgin! All forms of expression are welcome here. - Reply to this comment
- hoosiertide, besides, use your brain. It cannot or would not have benefited Romney to purposely bleed dry a company that he bought. It would have made Romney a lot more money to make it successful.
What you are really saying is that Romney is a mean, dishonest man. I don''t fall for that garbage. I see more hate and meanness coming from Juan McCain and Huck the Hick than from Romney. Romney has tried to stick to the issues and positions in his ads and his debates and his comments. Can''t say that for the other two. They get personal.
Shame on them. VOTE ROMNEY! - Reply to this comment
