Comments on: Huckabee Continues Slamming Romney
Add a Comment See all 83 Comments
- sir38,
Hannity et al. are not being principled; they are Romney-boughts. Google it - Romney''s Bain Capital is going to be writing their paychecks when it finishes buying Clear Channel - they have a livelihood to protect!
(Yeah, Bain Capital - the same company that is working with a Chinese terrorist-supporting company to help them buy 3COM - an American company with national security technology and the reason that Duncan Hunter said ''no way'' to endorsing Romney) - Reply to this comment
- Melinda:
Is it perhaps that McCain, although certainly liberal on many of his positions, has at least been consistant? One needs only to look at his record. Gov. Romney, on the other hand, has not been consistant. His record on gun control, illigal aliens, same *** marriage, abortion, etc... and conflicting statements made over the last several years reveal that.
Please don''t get me wrong. I have a great deal of respect for Gov. Romney and his accomplishments as a business man. However, I do not admire his record as a Governor or his "flexibility" since he began his campaign on various key issues. I also don''t percieve him to be a very genuine man who is "in touch" with the "Joe Mainstreets" of this country.
Like Gov. Huckabee, a person does not have to agree with me in order to earn my respect, but that person at least has to be consistant in his/her beliefs.
Maybe that''s why?!?
Oh, and by the way... a vote for Huckabee IS a vote for HUCKABEE!!! - Reply to this comment
- It''s the endorsements people give when they have to lose than to gain by endorsement that matter. Ingraham, AND ESPECIALLY HANNITY, have more to lose by endorsing Romney than to gain, since they know the risk alientating the probable winner with the endorsement (McCain). It shows Hannity and Ingraham have beliefs that matter more than their personal interests, and it reaffirms to me that they are principled. This is also the reason that Crist and Swarzenegger''s endorsements of McCain mean nothing. They''re opportunistic. They were waiting to see how they could gain the most with their endorsements.
- Reply to this comment
- Since when is telling the truth about an opponents record and stance "Slamming"? Only when you support the one being "outed"! Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa spending less that one tenth the amount. The only reason Romney has been able to stay in the race is because he has used massive amounts of his personal fortune. The media has painted Huckabee out of the picture, calling it a two man race, because they know Huckabee is the only contender who could inspire the base like he did in Iowa and beat Hill or Bambi. Get ready for four years of hell!
- Reply to this comment
- Since when is telling the truth about an opponents record and stance "Slamming"? Only when you support the one being "outed"! Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa spending less that one tenth the amount. The only reason Romney has been able to stay in the race is because he has used massive amounts of his personal fortune. The media has painted Huckabee out of the picture, calling it a two man race, because they know Huckabee is the only contender who could inspire the base like he did in Iowa and beat Hill or Bambi. Get ready for four years of hell!
- Reply to this comment
- Since when is telling the truth about an opponents record and stance "Slamming"? Only when you support the one being "outed"! Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa spending less that one tenth the amount. The only reason Romney has been able to stay in the race is because he has used massive amounts of his personal fortune. The media has painted Huckabee out of the picture, calling it a two man race, because they know Huckabee is the only contender who could inspire the base like he did in Iowa and beat Hill or Bambi. Get ready for four years of hell!
- Reply to this comment
- Since when is telling the truth about an opponents record and stance "Slamming"? Only when you support the one being "outed"! Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa spending less that one tenth the amount. The only reason Romney has been able to stay in the race is because he has used massive amounts of his personal fortune. The media has painted Huckabee out of the picture, calling it a two man race, because they know Huckabee is the only contender who could inspire the base like he did in Iowa and beat Hill or Bambi. Get ready for four years of hell!
- Reply to this comment
- Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa spending less that one tenth the amount. The only reason Romney has been able to stay in the race is because he has used massive amounts of his personal fortune. The media has painted Huckabee out of the picture, calling it a two man race, because they know Huckabee is the only contender who could inspire the base like he did in Iowa and beat Hill or Bambi. Get ready for four years of hell!
- Reply to this comment
- Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa spending less that one tenth the amount. The only reason Romney has been able to stay in the race is because he has used massive amounts of his personal fortune. The media has painted Huckabee out of the picture, calling it a two man race, because they know Huckabee is the only contender who could inspire the base like he did in Iowa and beat Hill or Bambi. Get ready for four years of hell!
- Reply to this comment
- It is about time Huckabee blasted that lying cheating Romney. He has been lying about Huckabee for months with his purchased media power. He thought he could say enough lies and spend enough money to buy the White House - WRONG!!! WE THE PEOPLE still decide elections.
WE ARE VOTING MIKE HUCKABEE!!!! - Reply to this comment
