Comments on: Unusual Detail in Sotomayor Rulings

Washington Post Analysis: Experts Say Supreme Court Nominee's Uncommon Detail Close to Overstepping Traditional Role

Add a Comment See all 27 Comments
by briannorwood July 9, 2009 2:13 PM EDT
I agree. Remove Clarence Thomas from the bench!
Reply to this comment
by pubsnomore July 9, 2009 1:39 PM EDT
If you replaced Bush with Obama's name, I'd agree with you.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan July 9, 2009 12:58 PM EDT
Sotomayor is just what we should expect from Obama - an activist judge with no respect for our basic constitutional right to keep and bear arms!
Reply to this comment
by pubsnomore July 9, 2009 1:39 PM EDT
If you replaced Bush with Obama's name, I'd agree with you.
by gunownerdan July 9, 2009 5:14 PM EDT
fred,
Sotomayor thinks civilians do not have a right to own guns, a belief she shares with Adolf Hitler and every communist dictator in history.
by goffredo29 July 9, 2009 12:55 PM EDT
Men should not handle or take Boniva.
Reply to this comment
by actornaught July 9, 2009 12:47 PM EDT
The town felt it had a right to throw out the test results, and the appellate court was compelled to apply the law as it was written. Supreme court has different priorities from the appellates, and could make the decision it did. Standard stuff.
Reply to this comment
by summarex July 9, 2009 12:44 PM EDT
Not that I agree with too much of here politics but are they bothered by the fact that she doesn't take the findings of lower judges and juries as fact? Isn't that what apellate judges are there to NOT do? Or are theyt supposed to be rubber stamps like everything else in this country?
Reply to this comment
by saturn05 July 9, 2009 12:40 PM EDT
Oh, so she is too good at her job so we must look for trouble where??? As we know from our current Supreme Court justices(majority Conservative), they should be investigated now for the way they and make their decisions. Labeling things conservative or liberal is too easy. I am a staunch liberal, but I would lean towards backing the prosecutor or the defendant. What would that do to the guys system of rating the justice?
Reply to this comment
by warpmail July 9, 2009 12:39 PM EDT
No! It is up to the justices and judges to uphold the Constitution, not prescribe remedies. If you follow your line of reasoning then ALL judges can "make right" every perceived wrong. This is the touchy/feely approach to the judiciary.
Reply to this comment
by mrleme July 9, 2009 12:33 PM EDT
actornaught you forgot about the hispanic firefighter(s) that were included in the lawsuit. By the way, if you passed a difficult test wouldn't you want to "get the prize?" This reverse discrimination has been going on oh for about 30 years per a L.A. fire chief I know.
Reply to this comment
by actornaught July 9, 2009 12:47 PM EDT
The town felt it had a right to throw out the test results, and the appellate court was compelled to apply the law as it was written. Supreme court has different priorities from the appellates, and could make the decision it did. Standard stuff.
by gunownerdan July 9, 2009 12:32 PM EDT
I know you are but what am I?
Reply to this comment
See all 27 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy.. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Sarah Palin's Popularity Grows, Poll Finds

    (376 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: