Comments on: Small Businesses Brace For Tax Battle
Washington Post: Individuals, Business Groups Know They Are A Target For Obama's Tax Increases
Add a Comment See all 158 Comments
- Gee, wasn't it Clinton that had the pen in his hand when NAFTA was signed? It wasn't Bush that signed it, and NAFTA is considered the reason for all the job loss right? How's Obama's plan to get rid of NAFTA coming along? Oh, that's right, he lied about that one, NAFTA is as strong as ever under Obama.
---------------------------
Posted by promaclaura
But...but...but...Clinton!!!
As usual, another Repub not willing to take their share of the blame. - Reply to this comment
- Gee, still no answer on the wage of your highest paid employee, come on, we want to hear about how your revving up the middle class, providing those "high" paying jobs for the middle class.
ps Since Clinton passed NAFTA, Bush HAD to give tax cuts to retain the remaining jobs that ol Clinton "greased" up and let slip away. I never said that Bushes tax cuts "created jobs", as a matter of fact if Bush hadn't offered tax breaks we'd be worse off and with a lot less jobs. Just watch what happens numbnuts, taxes will be raised and even the "retained" jobs will go bye-bye. Oh but we'll have your ice cream stand jobs or maybe it's a car wash you run.
Posted by promaclaura at 7:22 PM : Apr 27, 2009
Sorry Skippy but that's just a bunch of hoooohaaa! Economists from both sides of the isle say that NAFTA has brought a net job gain. Even John McCain said so! You'll have to try harder if you want to blame Bush's failures on Obama.
So how many jobs did those Bush tax cuts for the rich create?
Hello?
Anyone home?
Crickets............
lol! lol! lol!
hahahahahahaha!!!! - Reply to this comment
- Speaking of the same tired song, how many jobs did the Bush tax cuts for the rich create?
Hello?
Nothing?
Crickets.................
lol!
Posted by BeckieBest at 7:10 PM : Apr 27, 2009
Gee, still no answer on the wage of your highest paid employee, come on, we want to hear about how your revving up the middle class, providing those "high" paying jobs for the middle class.
ps Since Clinton passed NAFTA, Bush HAD to give tax cuts to retain the remaining jobs that ol Clinton "greased" up and let slip away. I never said that Bushes tax cuts "created jobs", as a matter of fact if Bush hadn't offered tax breaks we'd be worse off and with a lot less jobs. Just watch what happens numbnuts, taxes will be raised and even the "retained" jobs will go bye-bye. Oh but we'll have your ice cream stand jobs or maybe it's a car wash you run.
Posted by promaclaura at 7:22 PM : Apr 27, 2009
Sorry Skippy but that's just a bunch of hoooohaaa! Economists from both sides of the isle say that NAFTA has brought a net job gain. Even John McCain said so! You'll have to try harder if you want to blame Bush's failures on Obama.
So how many jobs did those Bush tax cuts for the rich create?
Hello?
Anyone home?
Crickets............
lol! - Reply to this comment
- Oh please, Bush Jr. got caught in the "perfect storm" that started under Clinton's NAFTA go ahead.
----------------------
Posted by promaclaura
And there you were, complaning about all the people still harping about Bush. But its OK to still blame Clinton, right? LOL.
Posted by sabre1111 at 7:13 PM : Apr 27, 2009
It's as if Bush never was President.
Well he did spend most of his term on vacation.
lol!
Posted by BeckieBest at 7:15 PM : Apr 27, 2009
Gee, wasn't it Clinton that had the pen in his hand when NAFTA was signed? It wasn't Bush that signed it, and NAFTA is considered the reason for all the job loss right? How's Obama's plan to get rid of NAFTA coming along? Oh, that's right, he lied about that one, NAFTA is as strong as ever under Obama. - Reply to this comment
- Rather than stopping our Senate from spending like drunken sailors!
They raise tax on the "rich"
Don't you think they will pass their losses, by raising prices?
The poor man will pay.... - Reply to this comment
- If Mrs. Johnson makes a half-million dollars a year and doesn't think she deserves to be counted among the "rich", then she really needs to do a quick reality check.
Millions of Americans earn only minimum wage, with no benefits at all, such as medical insurance, retirement plans, or even un-paid vacation time - nothing. And the ranks of those minimum wage earners is growing quite rapidly.
I'll bet most of Mrs. Johnson's employees view her as rich, compared to what she's paying them. - Reply to this comment
- Speaking of the same tired song, how many jobs did the Bush tax cuts for the rich create?
Hello?
Nothing?
Crickets.................
lol!
Posted by BeckieBest at 7:10 PM : Apr 27, 2009
Gee, still no answer on the wage of your highest paid employee, come on, we want to hear about how your revving up the middle class, providing those "high" paying jobs for the middle class.
ps Since Clinton passed NAFTA, Bush HAD to give tax cuts to retain the remaining jobs that ol Clinton "greased" up and let slip away. I never said that Bushes tax cuts "created jobs", as a matter of fact if Bush hadn't offered tax breaks we'd be worse off and with a lot less jobs. Just watch what happens numbnuts, taxes will be raised and even the "retained" jobs will go bye-bye. Oh but we'll have your ice cream stand jobs or maybe it's a car wash you run. - Reply to this comment
- It's as if Bush never was President.
Well he did spend most of his term on vacation.
lol!
--------------------
Posted by BeckieBest
Yep, all the last eight years of problems were because of 100 days of Obama. LOL.
I'm willing to accept that Dems had their own hand in the problems we have now. But I'll be d@mned to let Repubs think they are going to get off the hook and blame it all on Obama. - Reply to this comment
- Oh please, Bush Jr. got caught in the "perfect storm" that started under Clinton's NAFTA go ahead.
----------------------
Posted by promaclaura
And there you were, complaning about all the people still harping about Bush. But its OK to still blame Clinton, right? LOL.
Posted by sabre1111 at 7:13 PM : Apr 27, 2009
It's as if Bush never was President.
Well he did spend most of his term on vacation.
lol! - Reply to this comment
- If that is the case lets just say no one can make over 150k per a year. What would happen to our economy.
-------------------------------------
Posted by dwilson59
150,000 is not 500,000 or even 250,000. While 150 will go far in Buffalo, where I live, its not even a dent in NY, LA, Atlanta or Miami. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.
