Comments on: Study: Recent Obama Ads More Negative

Washington Post: Democrat Aired More Negative Advertising Than McCain In The Last Week

Add a Comment See all 226 Comments
by missingamerica September 19, 2008 12:33 AM EDT
LOOK___ - you do not merit much respect, considering that you constantly tell the same lies but hide under continually shifting names...

And so your words have no value...
Reply to this comment
by lanawonders September 19, 2008 12:32 AM EDT
Study: Recent Obama Ads More Negative

Posted by wheear at 09:27 PM : Sep 18, 2008

As Independent thinkers, do we really need a Study:
To tell us what we can see clearly with our minds eye.
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica September 19, 2008 12:31 AM EDT
lollll...gee, is that your 50th nickname on CBS, "Look__"?

Should we throw you a party?
Reply to this comment
by sean5002 September 19, 2008 12:30 AM EDT

NEGATIVE= pointing out the truth .

And good on the Obama camp.
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica September 19, 2008 12:28 AM EDT
Why does Obama want to be president at all cost ? Is he genuine. Please remember to vote for a genuine individual , then American People would truly benefit.

Posted by godloved at 09:25 PM : Sep 18, 2008

I''ll ignore the rest of your lies, and just quote John McCain talking about himself in his book "Worth Fighting For":

[bq]
I didn''t decide to run for president to start a national crusade for the political reforms I believed in or to run a campaign as if it were some grand act of patriotism. In truth, I wanted to be president because it had become my ambition to be president. . . . In truth, I''d had the ambition for a long time.
[eq]

YOU have been FOOLED - it is McCain who only cares about attaining the position, and not about America.

He even says so himself, IN WRITING!
Reply to this comment
by wheear September 19, 2008 12:27 AM EDT
Study: Recent Obama Ads More Negative

It''s about time. McCain has been blasting him weeks. And don''t forget about Hillary hitting him with everything but the kitchen sink during the primaries.
Reply to this comment
by stevex47 September 19, 2008 12:23 AM EDT
Absolutely amazing how a nutjob could slam Obama as an elitist, when the boosh''s have made billions with big oil in their pockets...

and Cindy mcsames outfit at the RNC =$300,000.00 but Obama''s the elitist?

You could not be bigger hypocrits.
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica September 19, 2008 12:22 AM EDT
[bq]
"It suggests that the Sarah Palin pick and the newfound aggressiveness by McCain got into Obama''s head a little bit," Goldstein said. "He was under great pressure to show some spine, be aggressive, fire back."
[eq]

You have to fight fire with fire, when even the presumably unbiased academics who take it upon themselves to analyze your ads sprinkle their statements with a rather less than flattering depiction of you.
Reply to this comment
by liberalme September 19, 2008 12:17 AM EDT
Obamas ads have been more FACTUAL than negative.
Reply to this comment
by nearl4511 September 19, 2008 12:15 AM EDT
More negative than what?

Reply to this comment
See all 226 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy.. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Sarah Palin's Popularity Grows, Poll Finds

    (395 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: