Comments on: Study: Recent Obama Ads More Negative

Washington Post: Democrat Aired More Negative Advertising Than McCain In The Last Week

Add a Comment See all 226 Comments
by airboatboy1 September 19, 2008 6:45 AM EDT
He sure has a lot off material to pick through!
Reply to this comment
by rushliberal September 19, 2008 5:52 AM EDT
SO What? They are factual. Just wait till the ads about John McCain''s role in the Keating 5 come out - OR - about how John McCain helped the North Vietnamese after he was caught to get him a table and chair while in the POW camp.

John can''t even remember his name anymore and Sarah is already claiming that it is a Palin/McCain ticket.

And Sarah''s husband TODD is refusing to testify and ignoring a subpoena - what if you or I did that - we''d be in JAIL and that is where TODD should be.
Reply to this comment
by TrishG62 September 19, 2008 5:50 AM EDT
These same Democrats who people are panting to see own the presidency are the same ones who had the majority the past two years, yet did little more than issue proclamations such as "Potato Month". Okay, that''s a stretch but some of them were just as useless.
br
br
Aside from trying to sneak into bills, portions of the comprehensive immigration reform--the amnesty--that was soundly rejected by the majority of Americans, they have done nothing but make promises then whine.
br
br
If Obama isn''t going to do a total flip flop, then he''s going to continue with the "same old thing" that he so pompously accuses the Republicans of.
br
br
If the Republicans are rid of Bush, I think there''s hope they can reclaim the conservative platform. Liberals only get worse. The socialist ambitions of Obama will finish destroying this country with his entitlements and welfare and open border policy he''s long worked to have.
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 September 19, 2008 5:40 AM EDT
I hope Obama sticks it to them. He was called elitist by McCain. But now McCain is interferring with an ongoing investigation. Palin and hubby refuse to obey subpoenas. The elitists think they are above the law. Obama, stick it to them. Show them up for who they really are.
Reply to this comment
by rookieat65 September 19, 2008 5:17 AM EDT
Don''t you just love the way Babs and Charlie Gibson and Matt Daimon and Katy Couric are all just jumping with glee that their taxes are going to be raised and redistributed????
Lets all sing...TAX ME...TAX ME..I WANNA BE TAXED..I GOTTA BE TAXED
Reply to this comment
by rookieat65 September 19, 2008 5:11 AM EDT
Joe Biden is kind of under fire right now because the people in Iraq are really unhappy with him. Apparently he is one of the only guys who can get the Sunnis and the Shias and the Kurds to actually agree. Unfortunately it''s not really in a good way. It is on his proposal to divide Iraq into three separate states based on racial and religious boundaries, okay? What he did now, this is a year ago. The Senate passed a proposal. It was his proposal calling for an international conference on dividing up Iraq
Reply to this comment
by rookieat65 September 19, 2008 5:08 AM EDT
CLINTON: "...I was fighting against those ideas when you were practicing law and representing your contributor, Rezko, in his slum landlord business in inner city Chicago.

OBAMA: No, no, no.
(Excerpt from the January, 21, 2008, CNN Democratic presidential debate in South Carolina)
Mr. Obama
Is this why Rezko bought the land next to your new house and the seller took $300k less than the asking price? Per your bio on Clinton News Network.
Reply to this comment
by rookieat65 September 19, 2008 5:01 AM EDT
Biden at Nashua, N.H. town hall meeting.
%u201CMake no mistake about this, Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be Vice President of the United States of America.%u201D
Did Obama make a mistake????
USA Today Tue, 16 Sep 2008 3:20 PM PDT
As Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama targets his Republican rival Sen. John McCain for hiring former lobbyists to work on his campaign, a key member of Obama''s campaign is paying a Washington lobbyist for legal advice: his running mate, Sen. Joe Biden.
Why didn''t he just use his son and keep it in the family? Oh thats wright he quit being a lobbyist last week. *** now hes gotta pay one....
Reply to this comment
by rookieat65 September 19, 2008 4:45 AM EDT
How others see the U.S.
Speechmaker Obama has built his campaign on the promise of reform, the need to change the culture of American political life, to take on the special interests that undermine government''s effectiveness and erode trust in the system itself,

Politician Obama rose through a Chicago machine that is notoriously the most corrupt in the country. As David Freddoso writes in a brilliantly cogent and measured book, The Case Against Barack Obama, the angel of deliverance from the old politics functioned like an old-time Democratic pol in Illinois. He refused repeatedly to side with those lonely voices that sought to challenge the old corrupt ways of the ruling party.

Reply to this comment
by mainedoggie September 19, 2008 4:31 AM EDT
Elliott Abrams Gary Bauer William J. Bennett Jeb Bush

D.i.c.k Cheney Eliot A. Cohen Midge Decter Paula Dobriansky Steve Forbes

Aaron Friedberg Francis ******** Frank Gaffney Fred C. Ikle

Donald Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad I. Lewis Libby Norman Podhoretz

Dan Quayle Peter W. Rodman Stephen P. Rosen Henry S. Rowen

Donald Rumsfeld Vin Weber George Weigel Paul Wolfowitz

Reply to this comment
by mainedoggie September 19, 2008 4:30 AM EDT
OINK, OINK......

PNAC Members:

Elliott Abrams Gary Bauer William J. Bennett Jeb Bush

*** Cheney Eliot A. Cohen Midge Decter Paula Dobriansky Steve Forbes

Aaron Friedberg Francis ******** Frank Gaffney Fred C. Ikle

Donald Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad I. Lewis Libby Norman Podhoretz

Dan Quayle Peter W. Rodman Stephen P. Rosen Henry S. Rowen

Donald Rumsfeld Vin Weber George Weigel Paul Wolfowitz
Reply to this comment
by mainedoggie September 19, 2008 4:25 AM EDT
Why Iraq''s Sunnis Won''t Deal
Gary Schmitt
Washington Post
September 13, 2005
==============

So,.. is PNAC back online now, in hindsight? Re-writing their articles to accomodate their failed predictions?

SCUM.



Reply to this comment
by mainedoggie September 19, 2008 4:08 AM EDT
It''s all right here **********:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

Reply to this comment
by mainedoggie September 19, 2008 4:06 AM EDT
=======
YOU SAID The Project for the New American Century intends, through issue briefs, research papers, advocacy journalism, conferences, and seminars, to explain what American world leadership entails.

AND WHY DO WE CARE???

Posted by bgmusic
==================

Because these are the people who brought you into the war in Iraq.

Get it?


********* #4

I''ll say it again, do your research on PNAC.


Reply to this comment
by mainedoggie September 19, 2008 3:57 AM EDT
" The Project for the New American Century is a non-profit educational organization dedicated to a few fundamental propositions: that American leadership is good both for America and for the world; and that such leadership requires military strength, diplomatic energy and commitment to moral principle.

The Project for the New American Century intends, through issue briefs, research papers, advocacy journalism, conferences, and seminars, to explain what American world leadership entails. It will also strive to rally support for a vigorous and principled policy of American international involvement and to stimulate useful public debate on foreign and defense policy and America''s role in the world.

William Kristol, Chairman"

DOUCEBAG #3
Reply to this comment
by babooph September 19, 2008 3:56 AM EDT
Both parties know lies & nastyness will win -expect it to go farther,until the winner looks like a cannibal.
Reply to this comment
by mainedoggie September 19, 2008 3:54 AM EDT
DOWN with PNAC!

DOWN WITH BUSH, CHENEY, PALIN, McCAIN

Scary stuff!
Reply to this comment
by mainedoggie September 19, 2008 3:53 AM EDT
McCain / Palin = PNAC = BUSH

PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY.

This is some scary stuff folks!

DO your research!

Reply to this comment
by vranger September 19, 2008 3:51 AM EDT
"Some want to call Obama''''s ads negative campaigning, I see it as revealing the truth."

The you don''t see too clearly! ROFL

Independent studes clearly show MUCH more misinformation and outright lies in the Democratic Party ads. Do just the tiniest bit of research before you next make a fool of yourself. ;-)
Reply to this comment
by mainedoggie September 19, 2008 3:50 AM EDT
=====
The worse thing about McCain winning (AND HE WILL) is the fact that Sarah is going to have to live in that cesspool called Washington... Obama is used to living in the southside of Chicago so well he don''''t know the difference...

Posted by bgmusic
================


Spoken like the true red-neck, bigot republican pig that you are!

SCUMBAG PIGGY! OINK, OINK, LIPSTICK LOVING OINKER, PIGGY, FATGIRL, BIA-TCH MF.



Reply to this comment
See all 226 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lobbyists Pushed Off U.S. Advisory Panels

    (206 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: