Comments on: Candidates Got Advance Look At Questions
Washington Post: Spokesman For Minister Says McCain, Obama Were Told Of Some Topics At Saddleback Forum
Add a Comment See all 43 Comments
- Many will not vote for an illegal drug user for president.
Posted by mr2258 at 09:41 PM : Aug 19, 2008
Bush admitted to cocaine use and Clinton admitted to smoking dope--but claimed he did not inhale--who are these people that would not vote for a former illegal drug user--or do you think that Bush is sooo old, that cocaine was legal when he used it? LOL - Reply to this comment
- "Rick Davis, McCain''s campaign manager, wrote of Mitchell''s report that "there is not one shred of evidence that it''s true," saying that McCain was driven to the event and then was "in a green room with no broadcast feed" during Obama''s appearance.
McCain''s group is stupid to deny in this manner. When a person starts out not saying they did not due it, but instead saying people can''t prove it, cuz there no shred of evidence--they did it. Otherwise they would just say that they did not do it.
In other words--when people say something cannot be proved, they are already admitting guilt. - Reply to this comment
- That prompted a furious response from the McCain campaign. It issued a blistering letter to the president of NBC News yesterday, accusing the network of bias.
********************************************************** I think they have protested a bit too much.
Either that or the whole campaign is mentally unstable just like McCain is. - Reply to this comment
- Please excuse blogger mr2258
He has a serious drug problem himself and repeats himself over and over.
The people on this blog were abused children and unfortunately are continuing the cycle of abuse with their own children. They have never developed adult coping skills and have no other outlet for their bitterness and hatred. They were not raised with decent values and seem proud to display their own ignorance. They are sick in their neurotic need to lie and attack others.
They are not seeking the truth and have no desire to hear it. They are frightened to learn something that doesn''t fit with what they already believe - Reply to this comment
- THE HIGHLY DISHONORABLE DAILY MCLIAR STRIKES AGAIN.
- Reply to this comment
- Uh...eh...eh...ummmm..uh...well...uh...er...(and this is WITH a peek at the questions!!!)
Not being able to walk and chew gum without a prompter is reason enough not to want to debate...even someone as OLD as McCain. Sad day when you can''t out do an old man when it comes to answering simple questions. But then that''s when you throw the red flag and yell ''Foul!!!''...gotta do something to get the focus off your own lack of skills. - Reply to this comment
- McCain got busted. His cohort, the good reverend, trys to cover by floating this story.
It just makes McCain''s cheating look worse. - Reply to this comment
- Face it folks Obama needs a script to sound brilliant!
Like John Edwards Obama ain''t what he pretends to be. - Reply to this comment
- Obama admitted that he has used illegal drugs on national TV.Thats one thing that happened on the Rick Warren forum.Who will the dems. blame that on.Many will not vote for an illegal drug user for president.
- Reply to this comment
- Barack went out on a limb, trying to steal some votes from McCain by going to a forum that had religious overtones.
Barack was ill equipped to do so, due to his policies on all those issues that religious folks care about.
As a result, he spoke in platitudes, as well he should have, as he would have had to lie otherwise.
McCain was able to speak to the point, didn''''t have to figure out how to dance around the questions as his platform speaks to the religious.
What is so hard to figure out when asked who would have performed better ?
Duh!
Instead, you feel that McCain MUST have cheated...
pathetic, simply pathetic.
You Dems are just in denial.
Posted by RosieOD4Prez at 08:12 PM : Aug 19, 2008
Article Six of our Constitution also states "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States".
A bigger question is "Why are you trying to create a "religious test" ??? - Reply to this comment
- You Obama supporters just don''t get it do you.
Barack went out on a limb, trying to steal some votes from McCain by going to a forum that had religious overtones.
Barack was ill equipped to do so, due to his policies on all those issues that religious folks care about.
As a result, he spoke in platitudes, as well he should have, as he would have had to lie otherwise.
McCain was able to speak to the point, didn''t have to figure out how to dance around the questions as his platform speaks to the religious.
What is so hard to figure out when asked who would have performed better ?
Duh!
Instead, you feel that McCain MUST have cheated...
pathetic, simply pathetic.
You Dems are just in denial. - Reply to this comment
- Senator Obama was much better at the Forum than McCain. He displayed thoughtfulness and care with his answers.
Posted by Vincan at 05:09 PM : Aug 19, 2008
You have got to be kidding me! Do you really believe that? OMG - Reply to this comment
- Half of McCain''s answers at Warren''s forum were right out of McCain''s stump speech. So why did Warren let him go on "giving his stump speech" while cutting Obama off? Duh...
- Reply to this comment
- And who got the advanced look at Obama''s ANSWERS? McCheater.
- Reply to this comment
- Of COURSE they had the questions beforehand...otherwise Obscamma would never have showed UP! His answers were clearly memorized, and he had Matthew 25 on a teleprompter!
Too bad he looked like he was going to PUKE every time he mentioned a scripture or talked about faith. - Reply to this comment
- Why did the preacher keep mentioning the cone of silence when now he admits there was no cone of anything. So who can you trust anymore? When the audience is biased to a republican, the preacher is biased to the republican, and the press is falling all over themselves with their McCain bias. It is gagging since all Senator Obama needed to do was show what a devout Christian he is. He did so very well. McCain just played to the corrupt religious republican right who are wrong. Is McCain saved? Who knows. He sure does not conduct himself in a Christian manner.
- Reply to this comment
- Senator Obama was much better at the Forum than McCain. He displayed thoughtfulness and care with his answers. McCain just did his usual dance number and the preacher only told Senator Obama not to give his campaign type talking points. I will take an intelligent president named President Obama over the declining in intelligence McCain with his desperation to go to the dark side to try to win the election with lies and smears. McCain can not win on the issues since he was part of all the policies that have caused great harm to America. McCain
will make sure that no changes (improvements) will happen with our economy because the corporate interests don''t want any and are giving him all their donations. - Reply to this comment
- FACT: McCain was NOT in a "cone of silence". His campaign wants the press to stop reporting this FACT.
The denials of the McCain campaign mean nothing. They have already shown that they will lie and do anything to win. - Reply to this comment
- No Contest
By INVESTOR''S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Monday, August 18, 2008 4:20 PM PT
Election ''08: Last weekend''s McCain-Obama protodebate made it clear why Obama won''t keep his promise to debate McCain "anywhere, anytime." McCain, with a robust resume and details at his fingertips, won big - Reply to this comment
- Several times during the broadcast, Warren referenced a "cone of silence" for McCain during Obama''s interview.
Ubama must have been in the ''cone of stupid''..... - Reply to this comment
