Comments on: '60s Radical Bill Ayers Now Mainstream
Washington Post: Obama Was Asked About Former Weather Underground Member At Debate
Add a Comment See all 363 Comments
- Push the Obama wimp aside and let her at it!
The battle is WORTH IT! - Reply to this comment
- have all of you been here all this time? Clinton most certainly is associated with more terrorists than Obama. I do not believe that Clinton did not know what the FALN was about. Not for one second. Hillary wants to condemn Obama for the same and worse than her husband did. If you associate Michelle Obama with her husband then Hillary has to be associated with Bill as well. Obama and Ayer were neighbors. Ayers held a fund raiser. Hillary isn''t anyone to talk about fundraisers. Seems like some of Bill''s were associated with the Chinese government. Anyone remember Johnny? What was it Wu for a last name? I''ll look it up. And rowdy you''re not really a yellow dog Democrat are you? It doesn''t seem to fit some how. For some reason my impression of you isn''t that you''re a female yellow dog Democrat. (Do you remember why they left Texas for a while and went to Oklahoma? I do. You seem more like a male Republican to me that''s goofing on everyone.
- Reply to this comment
- OMG, Kstar, that one made me tear up!
Rise HIllary Rise!
Rise above it all! Fight like a tiger! And NEVER give up! - Reply to this comment
- Posted by RowdyTexas2 at 07:20 PM : Apr 20, 2008
Good posting Rowdy!!!! - Reply to this comment
- Posted by RowdyTexas2 at 07:15 PM : Apr 20, 2008
Only an Obamanite would think such foolish *******! so sick of hearing them say step aside...when in fact he should....only for the sake of the democratic party...not Hillary...we know he can''t win...And I know I will not vote in the general election if he''s on the ticket... - Reply to this comment
- lol, Kstar...here''''s why I support Hillary Clinton. It''''s kind neat.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 07:04 PM : Apr 20, 2008
yeah that was a good one...here''s another one that I like RowdyTexan2
www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcdnlNZg2iM - Reply to this comment
- I''ll just switch to this nic, since Jockh likes my other one so much :)
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by RowdyTexas2 at 07:10 PM : Apr 20, 2008
Here comes Jockh again cutting and pasting B-easy''s lies. ROFL! - Reply to this comment
- Posted by chitown639 at 07:04 PM : Apr 20, 2008
I don''t live in texas you idiot...Ohio will go to McCain. - Reply to this comment
- Thats funny, I guess you suppose Hillary will win Texas in the General Election, too???? HA HA HA!!! Nothing could be further from the truth!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by chitown639 at 07:04 PM : Apr 20, 2008
lol, Since Clinton got 1,459,814 votes in the Texas primaries and McCain only got 709,477, I think HIllary can hold her own in Texas. :) - Reply to this comment
- she will be blamed. She set it all up this way--but when it backfires--both she and people like you will take the fall--you all are acting according to the remains of the script she wrote. Too bad. So sad. I really do pity you. Poor thing. So...are you old enough that when she loses now, you probably will be dead if she ever tries to run again?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by b-easy63 at 06:38 PM : Apr 20, 2008
by the way b-easy she''s been blamed for everything you obamanites like to do...point the finger, when in fact your little Obama is nothing but a wusss and he can''t handle any criticism.....Hillary is a tough woman and she can handle anything that comes her way...for Obama if he loses the election...then he loses...that''s politics.....Hillary or Hillary supporters will not take the blame...but maybe Barack should look at what he created in all of this....(an angry man with no identity that just wants to be a president...)!) - Reply to this comment
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VeKppnBJ6U
lol, Kstar...here''s why I support Hillary Clinton. It''s kind neat. - Reply to this comment
- Because your home state will go to McCain boo hoo......want a tissue...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by kstar42
Thats funny, I guess you suppose Hillary will win Texas in the General Election, too???? HA HA HA!!! Nothing could be further from the truth!!! - Reply to this comment
- And Rowdy is the other Clinton gift that just keeps on giving. Now think about it--who among the serious bloggers wants to be affiliated with this person? LOL (besides kstar, Tracy_ morgan and terror islam, rudy and all known miscreants)
Posted by b-easy63 at 03:36 PM : Apr 20, 2008
B-easy63 the next time you want to post my name make sure I''m on line to defend myself...I got your number..you''re nothing but a middle aged obama supporter who is bitter because she knows even if obama gets the nomination her vote in the red state that she lives in will not help him to get elected. So she has to spend her time bashing Hillary and McCain supporters so she can feel she contributed something to get obama elected. Because your home state will go to McCain boo hoo......want a tissue... - Reply to this comment
- Analytical and critical my a/s/s you do your Clinton hating shill made up in your own hateful mind, and present it like facts...then don''''t read your own *** postings which have the facts in them!
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 06:08 PM : Apr 20, 2008
She''s really going to lose Rowdy--but before she goes, she is going to ensure that in every mind except her 18% of die hard Dem supporters...she and Bill are seen as rabid liars, no different than the neo cons and they will have ruined Bill''s legacy and undercut any future she had to run again.
She is not only perceived as a liar, but as vindictive, nasty and a smear tactician. Not good qualities if one is not a neo con. She will lose and many of her supporters (like you) will be viewed as dangerous, blind sycophants. And after all of this, if Obama loses to McCain, she and Bill will bear the brunt of the blame but Hillary will also be touted as the person so vile and poisonous that she destroyed her own party. It''s in the cards. If she does not get the nomination and Obama loses--she will lose in more ways than one. If she gets the nomination and still loses--she will be blamed. She set it all up this way--but when it backfires--both she and people like you will take the fall--you all are acting according to the remains of the script she wrote. Too bad. So sad. I really do pity you. Poor thing. So...are you old enough that when she loses now, you probably will be dead if she ever tries to run again? - Reply to this comment
- Every stupid FACT you have tried to post on these sites has gone through a $60 million dollar investigation and not ONE thing you''''ve posted was proven true! Especially not the ones you made up in your own mind! Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 06:15 PM : Apr 20, 2008
LMAO. See? They just float right out of your mouth and dribble down your chin. TRAPDOOR Rowdy. rotflmao. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by b-easy63 at 06:17 PM : Apr 20, 2008
Again, you use psycho babble to justify your own lying and ranting.
Give me a break!
Lie away, you''''ve been busted at it so many times, it''''s not worth the trouble anymore!
Enjoy yourself!
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 06:19 PM : Apr 20, 2008
I contend it was not a lie--just a mistake. A terrible mistake in that I blamed actions of the FALN on the Weather underground but not a mistake in the Clintons connection to and pardoning of terrorists. Fortunately for you--I''m not like Hillary. She not only continually repeated her lie--when she was confronted with a contradiction from Sinbad about Bosnia, she just dug into her lie and kept lying--THAT is what made her misspeaks LIES and not mistakes.
When confronted with your contradictions in the form of what I said, I went back and checked your version. Finding out you were correct, I issued and apology. Given there was not much else I could do but admit that I was wrong or keep lying. But I am not a liar--so the second option was not available to me--like it has been to you and Hillary and Bill. That is the BIG difference. Not a nuance you can see--but others will. :) - Reply to this comment
- Did you even READ that site you posted? Or did you just see Bill Clinton''''s name on it and made up your own lies about it?
I read it in its entirety. Unfortunately when I copied and pasted the link into one of my files, it was under terrorist affiliations of Clinton and I did not compare the names of the one terrorist group Clinton was affiliated with and pardoned with another he was also affiliated with and had pardoned.
It is entirely my fault, that I could not fathom a former President being involved in pardoning 2 terrorist groups who harmed other Americans and so made the assumption that the one group was the other.
I have already apologized for that--and in retrospect, I should have checked by info more carefully and realized that if one see''s a pile of ****** from the Clintons, it is not the entire pile, it is just the tip of a ****** iceberg. Should have realized he was in bed with more than one group of American killers. My bad. LMAO - Reply to this comment
- Critical analysis....geezus! Bunch of psycho babble bull *****!
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by b-easy63 at 06:17 PM : Apr 20, 2008
Again, you use psycho babble to justify your own lying and ranting.
Give me a break!
Lie away, you''ve been busted at it so many times, it''s not worth the trouble anymore!
Enjoy yourself! - Reply to this comment
