Comments on: Clinton Adopts Edwards' Populist Tone

Washington Post: Democratic Candidate Takes On Corporations In Speeches Aimed At Working Class

Add a Comment See all 394 Comments
by b-easy63 February 25, 2008 5:53 PM EST
WHY HILARY IS LOSING AND WHY THIS MAKES WOMEN LOOK BAD.

Women have often been accused of taking issues personally and when discussing anything reducing or distilling their arguments into personal attacks.

is it true? If so, it means we are still not ready for the position of President.

What is wrong with Hilary--she failed to attack the issues and instead has continually tried to discredit and attack the man. From saying he is a dreamer, to attacking his message of hope" and trying to draw attention to his race--when it should not be an issue (positive or negative) Hilary has shown she does not know how to debate rationally.

RAtional debates are objective--they can center around issues and votes or responses--but when they devolve to critiques of people--you lose the voters every time. The fact is, anyone who has ever argued knows, that the minute a person stops winning, they always start the personal attacks. It is bad form Hilary and it translates into 11 straight losses of states.
Reply to this comment
by l8c6 February 25, 2008 5:50 PM EST
Hmmm, I wouldn''''t hold your breath on that one. Who do you think is raising the next generation? Sad, ain''''t it?

Posted by erasmus6

Yes, but the human spirit has been known to rise above and the boomer generation is so corrupt many of their kids just might rise above with a surprising surge. Especially if they find themselves in the future standing in a soup line thinking about the sh*it their neo con boomer sell out parents used to preach.
Reply to this comment
by boatdocster February 25, 2008 5:50 PM EST
gdig60804

Like so many people, you are a bit misinformed. This "war" is about a group of people, who happen to be Muslim, being fed up by 200 years of Anglo abuse, stealing their resources, and killing their people.

If any other country did to the USA what we do to others, we would be totally outraged and take up arms. Why is that wrong when the shoe is on the other foot?

Seems like the very same thing we did in 1776 when the large imperial power, Britian, tried to run our country from abroad and sent the military to "enforce their strategic concerns"...

How quickly we forget our history!
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings February 25, 2008 5:47 PM EST
erasmus,
I''m not sure if this is what you''re getting at, but let''s say Obama was a "Manchurian-type" Muslim operative.
There are too many checks and balances in our government. As soon as he ''tried'' something, he would be out of there faster than Bill can hit on an intern.
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 February 25, 2008 5:47 PM EST
But wouldn''''t it be a horror to wake up and find out that you actually elected one to run your country?

Like I said, they got into your country, learned to fly your planes and then took over 3 planes and used them to kill people. And they are even recruiting Americans to help them.

Posted by erasmus6 at 02:42 PM : Feb 25, 2008

CLINTON''S NAFTA AT WORK--ERASMUS6--CANADIAN--STUMPING AND SHILL BLOGGING FOR HILARY CLINTON.

And you thought the NAFTA bill only took mfg jobs--Hilary paid hacks in the US--should be outraged that Hilary is now paying a Canadian to tell us what to think and how to vote for her. LMAO
Reply to this comment
by gdig60804 February 25, 2008 5:47 PM EST

What does Hillary Clinton have to do with it. You don''t spit on your own people; especially the people you want to serve at a time of war ( bottom line)

Thousands of Americans have been injured and killed fighting against muslims. Wearing a turban when you are not a muslim ; at a time of war is just wrong. Who''''''''s side is Obama on anyway?

It''''s like flying the muslim flag higher than an American at a time of war. For the muslims this is a religious war. The muslims do not like Christian American''''s, some muslims (most) will even kill or disown their own children for dating a christian American.


Reply to this comment
by l8c6 February 25, 2008 5:47 PM EST
b-easy63

I actually thought you were smarter a few weeks ago. You spend so much energy on Hillary though claim she is out of the way and Obama is the nomination. The wise can see you are the same ol''neo con sh*it. You will be voting McCain in November I have no doubt.

Hillary a sociopath. Right wingers are a pathology that won''t end. The neo con gift that just keeps giving and driving the U.S. into ruin.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 February 25, 2008 5:47 PM EST
"Don''''t tell us that Hilary has outsourced shilling to Canada now..." posted by b-easy63

You are funny, stupid, but funny.
Reply to this comment
by boatdocster February 25, 2008 5:45 PM EST
Hillary has had a long and somewhat admirable career of firsts, but when you really look at her achievements, they are Hillary focused, not leading teams or accomplishing large things.

I think that may be part of her underlying frustration - Obama has motivated and inspired people and run a great campaign to date, something HRC does not and has not done, and it pains her.

Right of passage or not, she is being beaten by a younger, less connected, less experienced candidate. Not much fun for her...
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 February 25, 2008 5:45 PM EST
"The next generation I hope is wiser than the last one" posted by 18c6

Hmmm, I wouldn''t hold your breath on that one. Who do you think is raising the next generation? Sad, ain''t it?
Reply to this comment
See all 394 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: