Comments on: Clinton Adopts Edwards' Populist Tone
Washington Post: Democratic Candidate Takes On Corporations In Speeches Aimed At Working Class
- Maybe if McCain win''s he should make Edwards his Vice.then when he croaks in office,we will have a REAL president to fix the mess George Gump put us in!
- Reply to this comment
- Well now Hillary has a new face to wear.The Clinton''s are willing to do ANYTHING no matter how false it is!
- Reply to this comment
- Edwards always was the one with the ideas, but the other two had the $$$$. He would have won by now if it were judged on ability and not as an Oprah vs Bill Clinton contest, shaped by the mass media. Barrack is bright enough to be President, Hillary is bright enough and experienced enough to be President, but Edwards is bright enough, experienced enough and has won battle after battle with the Corporatist Clique that now runs this country. He has destroyed them in court and if voters like random_radar were more intelligent, he would lead us out of the sewer that the Cowardly Cowboy has created.
- Reply to this comment
- "Oh I see, when Hillary does it, it''s called "adopting".
but when Obama does it, it''s called "plagarizing"
Nice spin job there, C.linton B.roadcasting S.ystem"
Posted by mocaIeo
Edwards says PaTAYto, Hillary says PaTAHto,
What does it matter?
Bill supported the Iraq war, now he says he never did.
The Clintons will do anything, say anything, run over anyone to get elected.
I just hope Obama doesn''t mysteriously "commit suicide" here soon. - Reply to this comment
- Go! Roh! Roh! Roh!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 06:46 PM : Feb 25, 2008
I hope you aren''t too depressed when she loses. You are delusional in thinking she will win. - Reply to this comment
- Go Hillary! You don''t sound like John Edwards at all. You sound like Hillary Clinton! Fight light tiger! Let all these guys get off on their Hillary bashing!
We need competence in the White House instead of another 4 years of incompetent buffoonery!
Go! Roh! Roh! Roh! - Reply to this comment
- Now that the true character of Hillary has been displayed for the world - a vindictive and bitter scorned woman, it will be the end of her national political career. The way she has gone in order to try and destroy Obama, yes siree, destroy, in mean and vicious ways, she has also destroy any hope of reincarnating her national ambitions in the future. If only she has withdrawn somewhat graciously, we would have considered and support her in the future. But not anymore! How can anyone support and vote for the person we have seen in the last few days? It is the end of the road for the Billaries. As for any hope of a Clinton legacy - dream on!!
- Reply to this comment
- Hillary is a smart educated women who can lead us in the right direction.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by gdig60804 at 05:56 PM : Feb 25, 2008
+ report abuse
Likely she will lose since many independents can''t stomach her - Reply to this comment
- That''''s the bottom line.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by republican7 at 06:00 PM : Feb 25, 2008
so right - Reply to this comment
- All you that really think the economy was great in the 90s need to keep in mind that congress was involved in the balanced budget. Anyone recall welfare reform? i seem to remember that was forced on ol'' slick willy, as was the balanced budget paln as provided by that nut job gingrich who actually tried to maintain fiscal responsiblity to the american people. of course, i''m going to be called a republican. i prefer independent.
Ombama 08 - send Hillary and her politics of dischord back to the 90s. - Reply to this comment
- If sounding like John Edwards was a winning strategy, then John Edwards would still be in the race...
- Reply to this comment
- Wow !!! Now Hillary is morphing into John Edwards! I guess I should have expected this since her best remark of the Texas debate at the end was lifted directly from Edwards prior to his dropping out of the campaign. But who can blame her, since she''s bombing as HILLARY. At this point, my only question is " Will the REAL Hillary please stand up?".. ( or better yet, SIT DOWN !!!) Shifting to Edward''s populism at this stage is alot like Bush''s surge five years into the war.. It''s a little late !!!!
- Reply to this comment
- I''m out of here. I have SamTheTVCat making passes at me because she was unsuccessful on match.com. She admitted she''s fat and ugly and I don''t know any educated man that would go with her.
So bye bye now - Reply to this comment
- Slick Hilly is a calculating hormonal *** dragging a trailer of fertilizer the size of Kansas behind her.
She will unify republicans like no republican can & then lose to them.
Everything from the theft of the white house furniture to the mark rich pardon will be back on the table for the general election.
Vote for Slick Hilly if you want to put McCain in the White House.
That''s the bottom line. - Reply to this comment
- Obama is way to inexperience!! We cannot afford to have someone in office just because of his race. Even though SamTheTVCat takes offense to the color black, I don''t.
Hillary has more experience and the economy was never better than when her husband was in office. We were not at war and he got along with other countries. Hillary is a smart educated women who can lead us in the right direction. - Reply to this comment
- SamTheTVCat
I really what color you are. I knew you were big and Ugly and can''t get a man!!! At least you admit it. Now was that hard? Don''t be so bitter I can get an educated man and you can''t - Reply to this comment
- And who is Hillary today? Populist? This person was a corporate lawyer, sat on the Wal-Mart board and took insider tips on cattle futures, to name a few non-populist activities.
Americans should see through this or they deserve what they get, i.e., McCain. - Reply to this comment
- Actually, I have a graduate degree, make more than $50K/year (quite a bit more), and don''t belong to a union. But in texas today, I went out & early voed for slick hilly in the primary. Why?
Because McCain doesn''t need my vote in the primary, and Slick Hilly will be much, much easier to beat than Obama.
I voted FOR Slick Hilly only so I can next vote AGAINST her.
Make sense? - Reply to this comment
- PS Back to the article, I don''t think this line of attack is going to work for Hillary - just more of the same. Probably it''ll rally her base, but like I said I don''t think that gives her the numbers to pull it off. They''re vocal but they''re not numerous . . .
- Reply to this comment
- gdig60804, and I''m white . . .
- Reply to this comment




