Comments on: Candidates' Earmarks Exposed

Washington Post: Clinton, Obama Helped Secure Millions For Projects, McCain Abstained

Add a Comment See all 46 Comments
by b-easy63 February 15, 2008 3:57 AM EST
What Americans really want to know is why did Hilary let her campaign go to jail for failing to report a 200,000.00 donation from Peter Paul and Stan Lee, why then Bill Clinton lie and steal Stan Lee''s business partner and why Clinton had flunkies tell the court that she never knew Peter Paul or Stan Lee nor had she ever met them--then they can roll the video of her chumming it up with Peter Paul including planning an illegal fund raiser where she solicits funds from Cher worth more than the fee She should have been charged for Cher--If she can do all of that with a straight face--we can at least hear her out--at least long enough for them to convene a special grand jury for her--and oh yeah--how did the case get turned over to a judge Bill appointed? This case is pending in CA--quite an ugly little secret if it comes out--probably just one of many. LOL
Reply to this comment
by julian1413 February 15, 2008 1:02 AM EST
CBS - where is this story? "So I guess Obamaniacs are proud of the fact that while their candidate is telling them that this nomination should be based on the number of people who voted for him and not the superdelegates, he''''s been spending $694,000 to Hillary''''s 195,500 in trying to buy them off." You can find it on ABC & FOX... hum... guess you are hiding this to get Barack elected!!
Reply to this comment
by julian1413 February 15, 2008 12:58 AM EST
So - who''se lying here cbsnews or abcnews & foxnews? Why are reports slanted differently???
Reply to this comment
by sjbj2322 February 15, 2008 12:33 AM EST
So I guess Obamaniacs are proud of the fact that while their candidate is telling them that this nomination should be based on the number of people who voted for him and not the superdelegates, he''s been spending $694,000 to Hillary''s 195,500 in trying to buy them off. Yes, pork spending should be eliminated but with the Republicans blocking anything and everything its sometimes been an evil necessary in order to meet Senators pledges to their home state constituents. Want it to end....get the *** Republicans out of Washington. Its not enough to put a Democrat in the White House, there has to be a clear majority of Democrats in the House and Senate.
Reply to this comment
by tibu987 February 15, 2008 12:17 AM EST
Hillary, one of the ten biggest porkmeisters in Washington.

Do you really want four more years of the Clinton twins?

I don''''t.

And just where does all the experience Hillary claim to have, come from?
A shyster lawyer in Arkansas linked to scandals there.
First Lady for eight years, DUH!, she did not sit in on any national or international meetings.
A Senator from New York, gee, and she bought that one.
And yes, she also received major contributions from an indicted major donor named Norman Hsu, monies that she had to return.
And let''''s go back to the scandal that Hillary was involved in in Arkansas that had to do with fraudulent cattle trading that made Hillary over a hundred thousand dollars.
Ladies, please don''''t vote for Hillary simply because she is a woman. That would be the worst, simplest, and most naive of reasons to vote for her.
Incidentally, I am a male, white, 72 year old veteran, who voted for more women than men to hold my state''''s political offices.
A woman will undoubtedly become president one day, but it won''''t be Hillary.


Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 February 14, 2008 10:32 PM EST
b-easy63.....

I''''m sure glad I''''m only voting for him as a vote against McCain and Hillary, and not electing him. It would be a tough life thinking you think I''''m illiterate. Were you born omniscient?

Posted by drivelphobe at 07:05 PM : Feb 14, 2008


No, I wasn''t and am still not all knowing--but I also was not born with an extensive vocabulary. It was something that I worked at for years and therefore am cognizant that many people are too lazy or apathetic to actually understand the words they use or the true meaning of that word. Huckster is a colloquial term--and if more people knew what it actually meant--they definitely would not use it to describe anyone they liked or trusted.
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 February 14, 2008 10:30 PM EST
They should take a picture of the Nuclear Bill and show Hilary''''s name on it front and center.

They should also show a picture of her pledge to the DNC about not honoring the delegates of Michigan and Florida, then have a Blurb--"If Hilary promises you ANYTHING--she might honor it (then show the co sponsor and the pledge) and say "Or she might not"

Then the final remark "Hilary Clinton will do anything , say anything and for the moment, promise anything--to get elected. And we all know how well Hilary does not keep her promises.
Reply to this comment
by drivelphobe February 14, 2008 10:05 PM EST
b-easy63.....

I''m sure glad I''m only voting for him as a vote against McCain and Hillary, and not electing him. It would be a tough life thinking you think I''m illiterate. Were you born omniscient?
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 February 14, 2008 9:44 PM EST
addles..

I like the Huckster. He''''s the most entertaining of all and I prefer to use him as the vote against McCain. Have a great Valentine''''s Day.


Posted by drivelphobe at 02:01 PM : Feb 14, 2008


You better look up the definition of a "Huckster" it rates right up there with "Con" both means an untrustworthy individual who scams the public for their own monetary gain. The only people who would elect a person called "the Huckster" are the illiterate.
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 February 14, 2008 9:42 PM EST
So if Hilary is elected, she will be the President of New York City and the rest of the country can get its left overs.
Reply to this comment
See all 46 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: