Comments on: Bill Clinton Sells Hillary's Experience

Washington Post: Former President Says Wife Will "Deal With The Unexpected" Better Than Her Rivals

Add a Comment See all 411 Comments
by hungry1968 December 31, 2007 1:01 PM EST
Posted by tuckerndfw at 09:42 AM : Dec 31, 2007




Congratulations!! You''re 100% wrong - AGAIN. You''re able to overcome some serious adversity to continue to post incorrect and erroneous information on a regular basis!! Good Job!!


Who exactly is it that asks Congress to raise the ceiling on the national debt? That would be the Secretary of the Treasury. Who does he directly report to? That''s right - the president. So when the national debt needs to be raised, it is one of Bush''s cabal that requests it. Saying the president isn''t responsible for the national debt, is like saying he''s not responsible for the Iraq invasion and occupation.

By the way, how is "borrow and waste" considered more fiscally responsible than "tax and spend"?


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/16/politics/16cnd-spend.html

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5282521

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20870163/

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-09/28/content_6806725.htm
Reply to this comment
by julianbook December 31, 2007 12:51 PM EST
She''s an experienced liar and con artist.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 December 31, 2007 12:37 PM EST
With the exception of Neoconscum Bushits, whose retarded fuhrer cannot even put together a coherent sentence in the English language, and stood by as the National Debt was increased by over 50%! Nobody can be quite as stupid as a Bushit on purpose, can they?

Posted by gkc99 at 08:56 AM : Dec 31, 2007



I think this statement is incorrect in one particular area - Bush didn''t just "stand by" as the national debt was increased by 50%.

On the contrary - I think he played a very vital role in borrowing our country into debt for the next 5 generations.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt December 31, 2007 12:17 PM EST
As opposed to trying to sell Hillary, I think Bill should just give her away.....
Reply to this comment
by rspiker1 December 31, 2007 12:15 PM EST
Bill has to sell his wife because she cant sell herself. This is ridiculous. And what''s even sadder is that a lot of people in America are going to listen to someone who couldn''t even be trustworthy and devoted to his own wife and children. This family will stop at nothing for power and just like I definitely don''t want another Bush in office, I do NOT want another Clinton in office. My whole life has been a Bush or a Clinton and it is time for change!! OBAMA 08!
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt December 31, 2007 12:10 PM EST
I agree with the poster who listed Hillary''s qualifications as:

1. Being married to a president

2. Getting elected Senator because she''s married to a president.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt December 31, 2007 12:02 PM EST
One thing is agreed: 2008 will be good what with the A$$-whuppin'''' that Repugniscum will be sucking up!

Posted by gkc99 at 08:56 AM : Dec 31, 2007

Let''s all hope that it''s not Hillary who has the ladle in her hand......
Reply to this comment
by gkc99 December 31, 2007 11:56 AM EST
"You Liberals are the stupidest, most koolaid drinking, gullible, deluded, ignorant, blind, vapid, drooling, LIBERAL lemmings, and your people are gonna lose big in 2008!
HA HA HA HA HA! 2008 is gonna be GRRRRRREAT! "--Posted by DemWatcher


With the exception of Neoconscum Bushits, whose retarded fuhrer cannot even put together a coherent sentence in the English language, and stood by as the National Debt was increased by over 50%! Nobody can be quite as stupid as a Bushit on purpose, can they?

One thing is agreed: 2008 will be good what with the A$$-whuppin'' that Repugniscum will be sucking up!
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt December 31, 2007 11:44 AM EST
Washington Post: Former President Says Wife Will "Deal With The Unexpected" Better Than Her Rivals.

Really? Then she should have no problem dealing with not winning the DNC nomination.

Posted by mike71067 at 08:37 AM : Dec 31, 2007

I like it! I like it!
Reply to this comment
by mike71067 December 31, 2007 11:37 AM EST
Washington Post: Former President Says Wife Will "Deal With The Unexpected" Better Than Her Rivals.

Really? Then she should have no problem dealing with not winning the DNC nomination.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt December 31, 2007 11:18 AM EST
And the reason her father was deposed of his role in the government previously.

Oh well, guess you can''''t have everything.

Posted by joshdestardi at 08:13 AM : Dec 31, 2007

He wasn'' deposed. He was murdered.
Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 December 31, 2007 11:11 AM EST
You may not believe this bro, but after posting that comment the same spelling came to me.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by formrusmcsgt


Not really I have been using it for awhile, along with obamanation (abomination) Huckabilly, Gigoloanni etc.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt December 31, 2007 10:36 AM EST
Now, in regards to Hillary, her claims that she''''''''s been "vetted" are as hillaryous as they are deceptive.

Fixed it for you Sarge.

Posted by radiob at 07:32 AM : Dec 31, 2007

You may not believe this bro, but after posting that comment the same spelling came to me.
Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 December 31, 2007 10:32 AM EST
Now, in regards to Hillary, her claims that she''''s been "vetted" are as hilarious as they are deceptive.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by formrusmcsgt


Now, in regards to Hillary, her claims that she''''s been "vetted" are as hillaryous as they are deceptive.

Fixed it for you Sarge.
Reply to this comment
by demwatcher December 31, 2007 10:15 AM EST
Hillary Clinton''s experience record is a friggin'' JOKE!

SHE AINT GOT NO EXPERIENCE!

Myself and others have asked on this board MANY times for a Liberal or Democrat to show substantial proof that Hillary has the experience to be President. All we''ve gotten back was that she was in the White House as Mrs. Clinton or because she''s a senator.

WHAT A FICKING LAME ASSED RESUME!

"MY QUALIFICATIONS TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A"

1. I was married to a President.
2. I became a senator because I was married to a President.

It is amazing how self-deluding Liberals are when it comes to getting their people in power. They''ll will vote for ANYTHING and Hillary is the ABSOLUTE PROOF of that.

Also, it has been noticed that there has not been much mention (none by Liberals, in fact) of Hillary''s vote to support the war in Iraq as part of her EXPERIENCE.

Liberals appear to be afraid to touch that hot item, as it goes COMPLETELY AGAINST their world-view of the Hillary they are trying to foist on America.

And, anyone that would still listen to that lying POS Bill Clinton definitely has mental issues. That man was IMPEACHED for lying to Congress, he LOST his law license, and he DISGRACED America.

Just came in long enough today to say "Happy New Year", and:

You Liberals are the stupidest, most koolaid drinking, gullible, deluded, ignorant, blind, vapid, drooling, LIBERAL lemmings, and your people are gonna lose big in 2008!

HA HA HA HA HA! 2008 is gonna be GRRRRRREAT!
Reply to this comment
by carlylaine December 31, 2007 10:03 AM EST
jamurphy4

I am a conservative. I''m not afraid to have a woman in the White House. What I do fear is that a female socialist, ie Hillary Clinton, will get in there.

Conservatives would back a woman with no qualms, but not her and her leftist ideals.
Reply to this comment
by carlylaine December 31, 2007 10:03 AM EST
jamurphy4

I am a conservative. I''m not afraid to have a woman in the White House. What I do fear is that a female socialist, ie Hillary Clinton, will get in there.

Conservatives would back a woman with no qualms, but not her and her leftist ideals.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt December 31, 2007 9:57 AM EST
The biggest differences between the charasmatic and beautiful Benazir Bhutto and the frump and homely Hillary Clinton is that Benazir was intelligent who died for democracy for her country.

Posted by CarlyLaine at 06:53 AM : Dec 31, 2007

And about what, 4 dress sizes?
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt December 31, 2007 9:54 AM EST
The plain and simple truth is )and as much as some people hate it) Bill Clinton was the greatest president since FDR.
Posted by SgtRDS at 03:11 AM : Dec 31, 2007

I think that depends on how one defines "great", Randy.

If you refer to his political skills, I think you make a good point. He has ecellent political skills, no doubt. With an opposition congress to deal with 6 out of his 8 years, he instituted economic policies that enhanced the income of most in the country, balanced the federal budget, and even handed dubya a record surplus in the treasury.

If you''re referring to him as a man, I think you have a very tough sell. As a man, clinton proved that he''s not capable of controlling his baser instincts, is one who takes absolutely foolish risks for nominal gain, and that he isn''t man enouh to own up to what he''s done.

As I said, it depends on how you define "great".

Now, in regards to Hillary, her claims that she''s been "vetted" are as hilarious as they are deceptive.
Reply to this comment
by carlylaine December 31, 2007 9:53 AM EST
The biggest differences between the charasmatic and beautiful Benazir Bhutto and the frump and homely Hillary Clinton is that Benazir was intelligent who died for democracy for her country.
Reply to this comment
See all 411 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

    (490 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: