Comments on: Hillary Clinton Embraces Husband's Legacy
Washington Post: Former "Co-President" Runs On Bill Clinton's Record And Her White House Experience
- To rplat: According to Bob Brinker, nationally respected investment adviser and radio host,"Bill Clinton gave us 8 straight years of economic growth......unparalleled in our history." This was not "coasting" but great leadership! And, if you think he nearly destroyed the military, what impact has the Cowardly Cowboy had upon our military readiness and soldier''s morale?
- Reply to this comment
- - Omega29 - 66% approval rating after leaving office . . . nonsense! This statistic is mathematical garbage.
Posted by rplat a
http://www.pollingreport.com/clinton-.htm - Reply to this comment
- - Omega29 - 66% approval rating after leaving office . . . nonsense! This statistic is mathematical garbage.
- Reply to this comment
- I am confused. Does Hillary want to run as her own, liberated person or does she want to run as Bill Clinton''s adviser and right hand woman?
- Reply to this comment
- The surest way for Hillary Clinton to win the presidency would be for Bill to express regret for the embarrassment he put the nation through.
And the best way that can be accomplished is for he AND Hillary to let Americans know that he has changed. That he has asked for and received Her forgiveness. This would do more to gain America%u2019s forgiveness than anything else.
Bill Clinton%u2019s 8 years in office is stellar when compared to this Bush administration, or any administration all the way back to pre 1980,
As a matter of fact in the 2000 election, if Al Gore had embraced Bill Clinton and availed himself of the accomplishments of the administration with him as vice-president the past eight years he would have won in a landslide and we would have been spared this catastrophic Bush administration. - Reply to this comment
- Two for one!? BS - HIllary was not president; she had tea with leaders'' wives while Bill had the meetings on the issues; HIllary was not allowed in cabinet meetings nor the Pentagon situation room. First lady is "hostess-in-chief", nothing more; to say that qualifies her for President is nothing but more Clintonian Spin.
Bill gets credit in the 1990''s for nothing more than not *** up what was given to him on a silver platter by 2 GREAT presidents. Reagan and Bush 41 left Billy with nothing less than the unchallenged world''s best military (which Billy cut those 26 divisions to 12), a technology boom funded by the R&D tax credits Reagan enacted in 1984, and a nation with no major enemies to face after two resounding victories in the Cold War and the Gulf War. Perhaps some decisive action by Billy, rather than some FBI investigations, could have headed off our major enemie of this century before they became a force (al Qaeda). The 1990''s were a good time for most Americans, but it certainly wasn''t because of what Bill or Hill did; the INHERITED the 90''s; they didn''t cause them! - Reply to this comment
- Wow, the Hillary haters are out in force today. Sorry losers, when Bill left the white house he had a 66% job approval rating. No amount of whining by the the 34% that disapproved of Bill (but coincidently are the only ones believing that Bush is doing a bang-up job) is going to change that.
- Reply to this comment
- Ah yes Hillary . . . the bum nearly destroyed the military; had oral *** in the Oval Office; lied under oath; and, coasted along on a high economic cycle. Only a confused mind could be proud of all this.
- Reply to this comment
- Does Hillary embrace the Blue Dress?
Does Hillary embrace the explosion of teens having oral sexx because Slick Willy said it wasn''t really sexuall relations?
Does Hillary embrace how Slick Willy hamstrung communication between our intelligence agencies to protect himself but blind us to what terrorists were planning?
Does Hillary embrace how Slick Willy let Bin Laden go when countries were offering him to us?
Does she still use the china she stole from the White House?
Will she bring it back to use again or will she make the tax payers buy her some more? - Reply to this comment




