Comments on: Clinton Goes On Offense Against Obama

Washington Post: Losing Ground In Latest Iowa Poll, Clinton Mounts Aggressive Attack

Add a Comment See all 56 Comments
by rowdytexan2 December 3, 2007 5:09 PM EST
Posted by mike71067 at 02:04 PM : Dec 03, 2007

Any republican is a no-go until they can renounce the neocon manifest destiny for oil. Enough is enough!

They every one of them know what Bush has done to this country, and not one of them has embranced change or even mentioned it! To me, that means they are of the same lying, thieving ilk!
Reply to this comment
by mike71067 December 3, 2007 5:04 PM EST
"What about? OBAMA for president. Clinton or Biden for Vice-Presidents."
-Posted by samt66 at 01:47 PM : Dec 03, 2007

What about Huckabee or Romney for president, and Obama, Clinton, and Biden as the depressed Democrat losers who move to France in protest.
Reply to this comment
by hennogaijin December 3, 2007 4:40 PM EST
Hillary''s health "plan" is to force everyone to buy insurance?? Why is she running as a Democrat??
Reply to this comment
by hillaryin08 December 3, 2007 4:38 PM EST
Karl Rove is going to help Obamma now
Reply to this comment
by vastr-wcon December 3, 2007 4:31 PM EST
Here''s the rest of the "case" for O-BOMBA:

1. He is the most ignorant, inexperienced and lest-capable Dem politician running for president.

2. He is a total hypocrite on lobbyists. His efforts in support of Illinois lobbyists have cost US taxpayers $12 million (so far). (Documented by Brian Ross on July 16 - see ABC NEWS website) Michael Bauer, part of BO''s National LGBT Leadership Council, is registered as a lobbyist with ResPubica Group, a Chicago based firm that serves corporate and noncorporate clients.

3. His shady real-estate dealings with his partner-in-crime Rezko stink!

4. Bomb Pakistan, a current US ally.

5. O-BOMBA is so devoid of creative thought, he has to steal the campaign ideas of John Edwards on healthcare, poverty and nuclear proliferation and try to pass them off as his own.

6. Note carefully this exchange to understand how dangerous it would be to have such an IGNORAMUS in change of nuclear weapons:

2007-08-02 19:00:39 -

WASHINGTON (AP) - Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday he would not use nuclear weapons +in any circumstance.
+I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance,; Obama said, with a pause, +involving civilians.; Then he quickly added, +Let me scratch that. There''s been no discussion of nuclear weapons. That''s not on the table."

O-BOMBA is dangerous. America can, and MUST, do better than O-BOMBA.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales December 3, 2007 4:24 PM EST
"Cattle Futures" Clinton is a crook. She took swag disguised as profits from futures trading that came on the advice of a Tyson Foods executive. And Tysons got a ''by'' on its pollution of Arkansas rivers. People who support her have the same kind of true believer mentality as those who are supporting Bush to the bitter end.

Her health care program was a farce designed to fail before Congress...it was a give-away to Big Pharma.

She is getting campaign funding from the arms industry and Wall Street interests that support the Stupid Peoples'' War....a war she supports!

She has the support of many in AIPAC--the nest of spies who serve the interests of Israel first and two of whose leaders are awaiting trial for espionage against the United States in time of war.

And, she supported the KLA--the INTERPOL-named drug gang that Billy allied the USA with to attack Yugoslavia....breaking four treaties and the NATO Charter in the process.
Reply to this comment
by bookwerm314 December 3, 2007 4:04 PM EST
Hillary giving Obama a hard time on character is like Hitler giving Ghandi a hard time. Jeez.

Hillary is known and doing well (or was) for ALL the wrong reasons.. transferred unearned fame from her Husband.. "me too" voting that didn''t display presidential level wisdom, NOT a standout.. just the best known. And I just hate that the presidential election, at least the early stages, is a "popularity" contest just like at an inbred high school.

Obama did good things before others were watching, donating his time, just for the sake of it.. With Hillary, it has always been for the audience.. when she is left to her OWN devices, she does things like join the board at Walmart, and be the second largest recipients of Big Pharm and HMO money in the country! So just like cockroaches come out when the lights are off, Hillary did some nasty stuff when she didn''t have high visibility.. and now she desperately is sweeping those cockroaches under her PAC funded table and gleaming us with her sick fake smile.
Reply to this comment
by oleander8 December 3, 2007 3:43 PM EST
"...just how many chances should you give to a cheating husband"

As many as you want - it''s no ones business but your own.
Reply to this comment
by oleander8 December 3, 2007 3:42 PM EST
Why all the bitterness over Clinton going on the offensive? The "boys" have been doing this for months to her. No more Ms. Nice Gal -- go get''em Hillary.
Reply to this comment
by balto_babs December 3, 2007 3:17 PM EST
tempy123 and kiwi_chick ,
Clinton is NOT suggesting government run, socialized health care. Next time why not try reading the facts before you stick foot in mouth. Clinton''s plan is to require mandatory private health insurance and provide assistance to those people who can''t afford the premiums.
Reply to this comment
See all 56 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: