Comments on: Oprah, Bill Clinton Provide Star Power

Washington Post: Looming Showdown Between Talk Show Host And Former President In Iowa

[jonesforch]

As someone who served during the Clinton years I find it repugnant that this FORMER commander and chief would even think about making such comments. As I served thru years of military and Intelligence budget and people cuts its no wonder 911 didn''t occur before the true IDIOT left office. Does anyone remember when he forbid the Intelligence services from exchanging information with each other??? Kinda makes you wonder how the Terrorists played around in this country for 5 years before 911. Its well known that Billdo and Hilarious hold the Military and Intelligence folks in high disdain. What did Billdo do when he had his chance to get bin Laden. LOL He fired a few missiles at a few empty training camps. WOW Great smoke screen there Billdo. And talk about a Draft Dodger WOW Billdo leads the pack. Who''s the clown that pushed NAFTA. Another failed policy that is costing the American taxpayer. Hilarious now says in hindsight that it was a bad move. This Country can''t afford 4 years of their previous failed policies of these 2. If the Dems really want this election they have to come up with someone alot better than Billdo and Hilarious.

[logicanada]

sgtrds...
glad to hear it!
Funny how folks seem to want to retire away from what they know to places that they have heard nothing but bad things about.
Are we beyond the media brainwashing or just better at finding things out for ourselves?

[candide777]

We are. Ask any of my wives. They''''ll tell you............
Posted by SgtRDS at 08:02 PM : Nov 28, 2007

Shhh--you''re not supposed to let anyone know! And here, I thought democrats were all celibate, you know, just like Catholic priests, except for the occasional young boy, I don''t think priests have s_e_x, do they? [Note: this is sarcasm -- the s_e_x with young boys is just the tip of the iceberg, most priests prefer adult females; being a priest is the best of both worlds, *** whenever you want it, and no one to answer to for it].

[ajmarine1]

but once it became clear they no longer existed,

Posted by SgtRDS at 08:01 PM : Nov 28, 2007


If they "no longer existed," that means they existed at some point in time. What happened to them? If Saddam had said that he dumped them in his backyard, there would be proof of where they went; he said nothing.

[sgtrds]

logicanada

I''m headed to Zihuatanejo, Mexico for retirement myself. Wife and I have our eye on a nice condo overlooking the harbor. $125k and just the right size. Great view of the sunsets over the Pacific.........

Might just rent though, ownership laws being what they are and all.....

[candide777]

Using your logic, then ***** Bill getting a BJ from a 23 year old intern intrusted to his White House means all parents should warn their daughters that all Democrats are ***** old men and to stay away from them as they will break their hearts?
Posted by donbl1 at 07:58 PM : Nov 28, 2007

Ordinarily I respect your opinions, but no, you are not using my logic here. If you think that Craig is not a typical example of a hypocritical republican, you are not paying attention. I''m extrapolating on a hypocrisy that republicans have made relevant to THEIR politics. You are extrapolating on Clinton''s personal, not his political, life. They are not the same. If Clinton had been working diligently to strengthen and enforce sodomy laws, then yes, you might have a valid point about my alleged "stretch."

[sgtrds]

Using your logic, then ***** Bill getting a BJ from a 23 year old intern intrusted to his White House means all parents should warn their daughters that all Democrats are ***** old men and to stay away from them as they will break their hearts?


-----Posted by donbl1 at 07:58 PM : Nov 28, 2007

We are. Ask any of my wives. They''ll tell you............

[sgtrds]

OK, liberals - was Bill Clinton lying then, or is he lying now?

You choose.

Posted by One_American at 07:54 PM : Nov 28, 2007

1998, when the UN weapons inspectors had not yet been allowed back into Iraq and he was speaking of WMD''s that he suspected were there as it''s common knowledge that the Reagan administration sold massive amounts of chemical weapons ingredients to Saddam in the 1980''s. You''ll also note that he never advocated anything so stupid as a land war in Iraq. Instead he pushed for and got the return of UN weapons Inspectors who reported to the Bush administration time and time and time again that Saddam did NOT have any WMD''s and Bush launched he war of choice anyway. So it''s disengenius to pose it as a was he right then or now question. He did not have the information yet to dismiss the WMD''s the republicans sold to Saddam, but once it became clear they no longer existed, he opposed the war.

[logicanada]

Don...
appreciate the concern however Venezuela comes even more highly recommended than Costa Rica as a retirement place judging from friends we have living in both places.
And I question who exactly is backing these demonstrations.
And who exactly is reporting on them?

[candide777]

"One_American -- why are you posting here? Shouldn''''''''t you be busy licking Ron Paul''''''''s ___? Posted by Candide777

Two comments

1, he has every much right to be here as you, just because he doesn''''t agree with you, and can show good reason not to is more than enough proof that he should be here. It''''s called freedom of speach!
2) I see from your thought he SHOULD have been doing why you like Bill Clinton. I had no idea bill swings both ways.
Posted by speakinup at 07:50 PM : Nov 28, 2007

Again, speakinup, you demonstrate how incredibly stupid you are. One_American spams so that no one else can exercise their right to free speach. I have never said he cannot express himself - I have no problem with him or you spilling your pathetically stupid thoughts out here for the rest of us to marvel at, but I do ask that you please refrain from cutting and pasting the same stupid comments over and over again. Now, shouldn''t you be out on a ledge somewhere, instead of making the rest of us nauseous about the fact that people like you will be voting in this next election?