Comments on: Democrats Regroup To Take On Clinton
Washington Post: Obama, Edwards Adopt More Partisan Approach Ahead Of Debate Tonight In Las Vegas
- She will be just fine. Nobody would have to defend her. Newt said he admired her tenacity during those adversarial days. So, relax, and watch the rest of the pack melting down.
- Reply to this comment
- All Muslims should vote for Osama. He is the only Muslim candidate. We have a duty towards our brothers in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, etc. If we support him, then things will become better for Muslims in America, Iraq, Iran and elsewhere. Clinton is a Christian and she will not look after our interests.
Barack Osama Hussein ''08! - Reply to this comment
- I think Hillary is going to give them the 1, 2 knockout! Secondly, for all the dumbasses who are talking about experience, look at John Edwards (only been a US Senator once) and Barack Obama (still in his first term as Senator!) So cut that *** out! As far as the records go, the clinton library can''t release those papers until 2012! Even Bill has released more papers than any other President! they have 3 million papers to document, so don''t say what you don''t know! So please remember that MCvett!
- Reply to this comment
- Hey Liberals, helllo, I hate to be the one to tell you but Bush is not running for President!
- Reply to this comment
- Welcome to the "Lord of the Flies" island.
BOTH party''s spotlighted candidates are sliding into the "dirty tricks" everyone for themselves arena.
This isn''t Political Responsibility. It''s WWF in suits and makeup.
PLEASE!! The off the wall comic relief might break up the boredom of listening to scripted "party lines" but can we have something REAL - like a GOOD DESCRIPTION of HOW these people intend to RESPONSIBLY handle their possible future office??
All I''ve seen for way too many years is an IRRESPONSIBLE government headed for National Bankruptcy and International Irrelevance after that.
It''d be nice to see at least ONE of the group act as a responsible, intelligent, independent of lobbyist influence, clear thinking ADULT. - Reply to this comment
- Hillary is scared of her opponents!!! Wow, what would she do if elected and had to face a real crisis? Send billy??? And what experience do she have? Not a lot. She is banking on her time as First Woman...a thief ...and power hungry person. IF she had not been married to Billy Willy, would she have run? Probably not...she would be an unknown. Talk about riding someone''s coattails. Maybe she needs to check what is ON those coattails before hanging on. Monice may have been there first.
- Reply to this comment
- From the Examiner: "On Tuesday, a top aide to Hillary Clinton indirectly warned moderator Wolf Blitzer not to be too hard on her in Thursday%u2019s debate."
http://www.examiner.com/a-1049622~Clinton_looks_to_rebound_in_debate.html
Oh yes, she''s certainly presidential material - no doubt. The Democrats are in real trouble. How are they going to shove their socialist agenda down our throats with this "leader"? - Reply to this comment
- For those who watch the debate tonite and are serious about Politics, I look forward to reading reactions tomorrow. For those who do not watch and have comments please keep them to yourself. It isn''t any differant than not voting and then having an opinion after the fact. It is do or die for Mrs Clinton. I can''t wait! If I had to bet odds i would say she will not do so well.
- Reply to this comment
- ABC is reporting that many of the crooks Billdo pardoned in the waning hours of his failed Presidency are contributing maximum amounts to Hilldog. More corruption from the Clintoons.
- Reply to this comment
- Hillary being verbally attacked is NO DIFFERENT than any other person
running for president being verbally attacked.
It''s called equal rights and equal TREATMENT.
Get used to it...welcome to politics.
AND she''s not disclosing political documents until 2009, AFTER the election ???
Conveeeenient.
What does she have to hide??
Can you imagine the outcry from the NeoCommies if a Republican did that!!!
ROTFLMAO
Seig Heil, Hillary
. - Reply to this comment
- Hillary being verbally attacked is NO DIFFERENT than any other person
running for president being verbally attacked.
It''s called equal rights and equal TREATMENT.
Get used to it...welcome to politics.
AND she''s not disclosing political documents until 2009, AFTER the election ???
Conveeeenient.
What does she have to hide??
Can you imagine the outcry from the NeoCommies if a Republican did that!!!
ROTFLMAO
Seig Heil, Hillary
. - Reply to this comment
- The Democratic bill lacks one key feature President Bush is insisting on: legal immunity for telecommunications companies alleged to have secretly helped the government monitor Americans'' phone calls and e-mails without court permission. About 40 civil lawsuits have been filed against telecom companies, alleging they broke wiretapping and privacy laws, and the White House has threatened to veto any surveillance bill that does not protect the companies. The White House contends lawsuits could bankrupt the companies and reveal classified information.
THIS IS AMERICA, BUSH IF YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN, WE THE PEOPLE OF THIS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YOUR BOSS HAVE SAID YOU CANT SAVE YOUR BUDDIES IN THE LARGE WORLD OF CORPS. THEY GO BANKURP OH WELL YOU ARE LETTING MILLIONS OF AMERICANS FILE BANKRUPEY. - Reply to this comment
- Would you buy a used car from any of those three stooges and gutless wonders in that photo?
Well, maybe a brain dead Left Fascist bozo sipping at the champipple would. - Reply to this comment




