Comments on: CBS Poll: Uncommitted Voters Say Obama Won Debate
Add a Comment See all 225 Comments
- Ummmmm.... UnDecided: since you have so much to say about murder, here''s something about Mr. McCain''s stand on murder. Go to the USA Today link and read it for yourself!
John McCain served on the board to the U.S. chapter of an international anti- Semitic terrorist group linked to ultra-right-wing death squads in Central America. He is a terrorist sympathizer who condones the murder of innocent civilians... including babies and children.
Check it out!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/el
ection2008/2008-10-07-mccain-iran-contra
_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip - Reply to this comment
- And 100% of the sample of uncommitted voters were too stupid to find the voting booth.
- Reply to this comment
- They both sounded like a couple of rambling idiots to me...
- Reply to this comment
- The CBS poll is an ONLINE poll - and posted what - 2 minutes after the debate ended?! It matches exactly the results from the last debate. Wait no... McCain improved. All these online polls are a waste of time, there is no proper sampling - the numbers mean nothing! Sheesh.
"(CBS) The first presidential debate helped uncommitted voters learn about the candidates - and it appears that Democrat Barack Obama benefited the most, according to a CBS News/Knowledge Networks poll taken immediately following the debate.
Uncommitted voters said Obama won the debate against Republican John McCain, and more of those voters improved their opinion of the Democrat. But while 66 percent think Obama would make the right decisions about the economy, 56 percent think McCain would do so about Iraq.
Immediately after the debate, CBS News interviewed a nationally representative sample of nearly 500 debate watchers assembled by Knowledge Networks who were "uncommitted voters" - voters who are either undecided about who to vote for or who say they could still change their minds. Thirty-nine percent of these uncommitted debate watchers said Obama won the debate. Twenty-four percent said McCain won, and another 37 percent thought it was a tie." - Reply to this comment
- Bravo! goosebumps8
- Reply to this comment
- Wallylewis2: If she was SAIN when she killed the children, then she deserves the electric chair. If she was INSAIN or had a mental condition when she killed them, she should be confined to a mental institution.
- Reply to this comment
- Current House Banking Committee chairman Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts opposed legislation to reorganize oversight in 2000 (when Clinton was still president), 2003 and 2004, saying of the 2000 legislation that concern about Fannie and Freddie was "overblown." Just last summer, Senate Banking Committee chairman Chris Dodd called a Bush proposal for an independent agency to regulate the two entities "ill-advised."
Saying that Democrats killed the 2005 bill "while Mr. Obama was notably silent" oversimplifies things considerably. The bill made it out of committee in the Senate but was never brought up for consideration. At that time, Republicans had a majority in the Senate and controlled the agenda. Democrats never got the chance to vote against it or to mount a filibuster to block it. - Reply to this comment
- Oh get real undecided, you know very well that I''m speaking of civil rights. Let''s not be foolish and take every letter literally.
- Reply to this comment
- UnDecided9,
If you knew anything about abortion, you''d know that overwhelmingly the women who go through it are not doing it for the ''trivial'' reasons you state. Get it through your head that it''s HER choice, not yours, not Bush''s, not McSame''s or anyone else! - Reply to this comment
- If you are against abortion don''t have one. Is it the same as saying if you are for murder go ahead and murder? What the heck just everybody do whatever they are for. Maybe some people think rape is ok? Ouch! justmetoday put your crack pipe down and think about it once...
- Reply to this comment
- They need to do way instain mother who kill thier babbys. becuse these babby cant frigth back?
it was on the news this mroing a mother in ar who had kill her three kids . they are taking the three babby back to new york too lady to rest my pary are with the father who lost his chrilden ; i am truley sorry for your lots - Reply to this comment
- They need to do way instain mother who kill thier babbys. becuse these babby cant frigth back?
it was on the news this mroing a mother in ar who had kill her three kids . they are taking the three babby back to new york too lady to rest my pary are with the father who lost his chrilden ; i am truley sorry for your lots - Reply to this comment
- How would you like the job of taking care of an aborted fetus that lives? What would you do with the fetus because it is a real dilemma and it does happen.
- Reply to this comment
- Taxes: Obama proposed a rebate of up to $1,000 per family to defray increased heating oil costs, funded by what he calls a windfall profits tax on oil companies. He would increase capital gains and dividends taxes only for couples earning more than $250,000 per year, or singles making $200,000. For the rest, taxes on investments would remain unchanged.
Economic Crisis: On Sept. 22 Obama gave a speech laying out a six-point plan for expanding oversight of financial institutions, streamlining government regulatory agencies, investigating and punishing market manipulation, establishing a %u201Cfinancial market advisory group to meet regularly and provide advice to the president, Congress, and regulators on the state of our financial markets and the risks they face.%u201D
Supporting Troops: Obama voted for all war-funding bills that had come before the Senate since 2005, when he was sworn in. So did all other Senate Democrats. As recently as April 2007, Obama voted in favor of funding U.S. troops again, but this time Democrats added a non-binding call to withdraw them from Iraq. McCain (who was absent for the vote) urged the president to veto that funding measure, because of the withdrawal language. President Bush did veto it, and McCain applauded Bush''s veto. Based on those facts, it would be literally true to say that "McCain urged a veto of funding for our troops." - Reply to this comment
- Taxes: Obama proposed a rebate of up to $1,000 per family to defray increased heating oil costs, funded by what he calls a windfall profits tax on oil companies. He would increase capital gains and dividends taxes only for couples earning more than $250,000 per year, or singles making $200,000. For the rest, taxes on investments would remain unchanged.
Economic Crisis: On Sept. 22 Obama gave a speech laying out a six-point plan for expanding oversight of financial institutions, streamlining government regulatory agencies, investigating and punishing market manipulation, establishing a %u201Cfinancial market advisory group to meet regularly and provide advice to the president, Congress, and regulators on the state of our financial markets and the risks they face.%u201D
Supporting Troops: Obama voted for all war-funding bills that had come before the Senate since 2005, when he was sworn in. So did all other Senate Democrats. As recently as April 2007, Obama voted in favor of funding U.S. troops again, but this time Democrats added a non-binding call to withdraw them from Iraq. McCain (who was absent for the vote) urged the president to veto that funding measure, because of the withdrawal language. President Bush did veto it, and McCain applauded Bush''s veto. Based on those facts, it would be literally true to say that "McCain urged a veto of funding for our troops." - Reply to this comment
- If you are against abortion don''t have one. (This attitude applies to gay marriage as well.) If you are a man against abortion cut your p**is off. Whether a fetus is human or not depends upon your religion.
- Reply to this comment
- There are certain circumstanes where abortion should be permitted but just to murber a baby because you don''t want it is not a good excuse to murder
- Reply to this comment
- UnDecided9,
Thank goodness YOU don''t get to decide which circumstances are appropriate for abortion. A rape is a rape, whether it''s done to a young girl or an adult woman. NOBODY should be forced to carry the fetus from a rape.
You need to take your own advice and jump down turn around and pick a bail of cotton!!! - Reply to this comment
- sure, it''s ok to kill babies in Iraq, or in any other country, but the minute a woman decides she is not ready to have a child (even if she''s been rapes), the anti-abortionists go wild...When the choice-hating republicans stop killing people around the world, then they can take the high road...until then they can shut the *&%# up...
- Reply to this comment
- and he lived in a nuclear submarine...so that''s where his brain was turned into refried beans...let''s ask the people of Chernobyl how safe nuclear energy is...geez, this guy is stuck in the 1970s...
- Reply to this comment
