Comments on: Obama Ad: McCain Will Outlaw Abortion
Add a Comment See all 24 Comments
- No one wants to stop a pregnancy, no one. It is a very difficult decision to make...
To revoke Rove means to put in JAIL women who stop a pregnancy.
I think it is criminal to put women in jail for not being able to carry on a pregnancy.
This country will go back to the middle ages with fundamentalists like Palin.
ENOUGH OF USING RELIGION FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES.
ENOUGH OF USING RELIGION TO PUT WOMEN IN JAIL.
ENOUGH OF USING RELIGION TO THROW STONES TO THOSE WHO DO NOT AGREE WITH US.
ENOUGH OF USING RELIGION TO COVER LIES AND MANIPULATION.
ENOUGH OF REPUBLICAN CORRUPTION!!
This year,
True religious people will vote for DEMOCRATS ALL THE WAY!! - Reply to this comment
- John McCain cannot make abortions illegal all by himself, any more than Bush sent troops to Iraq all by himself...he had a little help. Even Hillary voted to send troops to Iraq.
And, by the way, bswalker121, don''t forget "Biden the plagiarizer." But, just remember, whoever is elected president will not be a dictator; this is still a democracy and remember who you send to Congress may be even more important than who you send to the White House. - Reply to this comment
- The Liberals are feeling threatened - that they''ll be prevented from indiscriminately murdering unborn children.
This is the basis of the Democrat Party.
Is that what America wants? A party that is so callously opposed to the right to life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness? - Reply to this comment
- McSame is going to wish he vetted her.
In a February interview with MTV, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin lavished praise on maverick Republican presidential contender Ron Paul.
She had a few nice things to say about another GOP candidate, Mitt Romney. But Palin made no mention of John McCain.
By the way she showed better judgement than McCain did supporting her. Ron Paul is 10 times the man McShame ever will be. - Reply to this comment
- What happen to 2.5 children in America. Not much to do up there in Alaska. Why don''t we ever see her holding her baby??? Because it may not belong to her--may be the answer.
Judy - Reply to this comment
- Q. How does a Radical Pro Life woman try to get rid of a baby she doesn''t want?
A. She stays pregnant and then . . . . when she breaks her water . . . . she doesn''t immediately get examined by a doctor . . . then ignores a Great Hospital in Texas . . . . gets on a plane for an 8 hour flight, (where No medical attention is possible) . . . lands and . . . . still doesn''t see a doctor . . . ignores a Great Hospital in a large Alaska city . . . . drives 2 hours and goes to a rural Small Hospital.
The baby survived despite the neglect . . . . but NOT because the Mother cared for it, as best she could have. God wants her to keep the baby. - Reply to this comment
- If Your A Pregnant Teen Vote For The GOP.... Ha Ha Ha
- Reply to this comment
- Liberals are afraid they won''t be able to kill babies anymore.
- Reply to this comment
- They said the same thing about Bush and look.....nothin happened!! And nothin will happen here.....so Obama needs to grasp at another straw. What about Obama?? How much tax''s will he take from us to help all the unwanted children or does he even care at all?? I''m guessing that he doesn''t care!
- Reply to this comment
- bswalker: you are a single-issue toad. Sending our soldiers to die needlessly is also murder.
- Reply to this comment
