Comments on: NY Times Comments On McCain Op-Ed Rejection
Add a Comment See all 72 Comments
- The New York Times is soo Biased. The only ones worse are PMSNBC and CBS news. Drvie by media is in the tank for Obama.
- Reply to this comment
- The New York Times is soo Biased. The only ones worse are PMSNBC and CBS news. Drvie by media is in the tank for Obama.
- Reply to this comment
- Fossil John has lost it!
Just look at the number of foreign policy gaffes he has made.
1. He gets Sunni and Shiites mixed up and has Lieberman to correct hiim.
2. 3 TIMES he has referred to Checkoslavia and since 1993 it has been Czech Republic. How long does it take for this man to reconize that fact??
4. This weekend he was re-arranging the middle east map with Afghanistan having a border with Iraq instead of with Pakistan.
Do we really need a president who is so ignorant of a very important part of the world or else so forgetful he can''t remember when corrected?? - Reply to this comment
- finally the new york times gets it right!!
- Reply to this comment
- Asked by Diane Sawyer whether the "the situation in Afghanistan in precarious and urgent," McCain responded: "I think it''s serious. . . . It''s a serious situation, but there''s a lot of things we need to do. We have a lot of work to do and I''m afraid it''s a very hard struggle, particularly given the situation on the Iraq/Pakistan border."
ABC News July 21, 2008 09:34 AM
- Reply to this comment
- Barack Obama views, before the surge:
%u201CI am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there. In fact, I think it will do the reverse.%u201D
Barack Obama
January 10, 2007 - Reply to this comment
- McWar just got an %u201CF%u201D on his geography report on Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Its ok, he will do better on his next report. I hear he is going to hire a tutor from the hooked on chronic and phonics learning center.
- Reply to this comment
- Americans are tired of War Mongering.
- Reply to this comment
- I think the NY Times should have printed it and let the whole world know what a fool McCain is.
The NY Times was trying to protect him. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by CBS4me3 at 04:21 PM : Jul 21, 2008
****************
LOL! nice. having admitted intelligence level (that ''thing'' called the new york times might help inform you more!), and even though you''re voting for ol'' John, you have little if no interest in his op-ed???? you are one fascinating hillary supporter! - Reply to this comment
- the nyt has now sidelined itself for the duration of this election cycle as far as Americans are concerned.
***************
so what? the smart hillary dems went with obama, by the way. take that stench to the repub''s side!!!
for the record, it is not uncommon for the nyt to request a submitting author to edit their piece a bit more. par for the course. but truly spoken like a resentful hillary democrat!!!! good for you!! - Reply to this comment
- Since I don''t read the thing, I would not have read John''s op-ed anyway. As a Hillary Democrat, I plan to vote for John and the republican ticket. Having said this, the nyt has now sidelined itself for the duration of this election cycle as far as Americans are concerned.
- Reply to this comment
