Comments on: Starting Gate: Five Questions
Add a Comment See all 34 Comments
- McCain Voted to Allow Unsafe Foreign Trucks on U.S. Roads. McCain voted against an amendment to prohibit Mexican trucks from operating beyond a limited border zone because they are not held to the same safety standards as U.S. trucks.
- Reply to this comment
- Of course he is Liberal. Bill Clinton was a liberal until he competed for the general election and then when he got elected he was FORCED back to the left- This is esactly what they will do to Obama- and then like Bill Obama will say ''I don''t know who I am!" No One knows who he is, including himself. This is a LEADER??
- Reply to this comment
- McCain: Those Jobs Aren%u2019t Coming Back. %u201CI%u2019ve got to give you some straight talk%u2014I can%u2019t turn that around,%u201D McCain said. %u201CI can%u2019t look you in the eye and tell you I believe those jobs are coming back.%u201D
- Reply to this comment
- 1. No, not Obama''s drama change, which is to say whatever as Party Puppet
2. No, he exposed another divide created by the Uniter, and Jr''s out of control and appears militant
3. Send him out of the country on tour with Obama
4. Yes a great deal, if McCain makes a mistake to invite the fringe in he will lose many I''s. Obama could pull some Hillary Dems with her on the ticket any one else will be a joke.. - Reply to this comment
- answer the keating five:
Alan Cranston (R-CA)
Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ)
John Glenn (R-OH)
John McCain (R-AZ)
Donald W. Riegle (D-MI)
were accused of improperly aiding Charles H. Keating, chairman of the failed Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, which was the target of an investigation by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board - Reply to this comment
- 5 Questions to consider:
1) Who do you trust more?
2) Who is most experianced to lead a country of 300 million?
3) Who is most qualified to make proactive decisions for a country of 300 million?
4)Who has had many previous votes in the Senate that can justify making the right Changes in the future?
5)Do you think it makes sense to vote for a 3rd party in the end when they don''t have shot? - Reply to this comment
- Vaughn, let me take a stab at answering these for you:
1. A resounding YES.
2. Who cares? It won''t have that big of an impact (if even at all).
3. No. There will always be those that put personal prejudice before the good of the party that represents their beliefs (my mom, for instance, will never vote for Barack because he "hates women," in her opinion. She was a Hillary supporter).
4. Yes, there will be a Bush night. McCain HAS to incorporate the party''s current leader.
5. No. Veep selections only matter to the media - the avg. American does not care. - Reply to this comment
- 5 Questions to consider:
1) Who do you trust more?
2) Who is most experianced to lead a country of 300 million?
3) Who is most qualified to make proactive decisions for a country of 300 million?
4)Who has had many previous votes in the Senate that can justify making Changes the future?
5)Do you think it is common sense to vote for a 3rd party in the end? - Reply to this comment
- Too funny none of this is going to matter to the swing voter. What the swing voter sees is are they obeying their masters.
- Reply to this comment
- The Reverend Jesse Jackson isn%u2019t (hasn%u2019t) been viably significant to America for some time now. The overtly insensitive statements made by the Revered Jackson against Presidential Candidate Barack Obama were yet another lucid display of another professed religious leader displaced in American Politics.
- Reply to this comment
- Five Questions Defining the Campaign:
1. Will McCain live long enough to give a concession speech?
2. Is a flag lapel pin THAT important?
3. Who''s your favorite preacher, and why?
4. Should mudslinging be considered an Olympic sport?
5. As far as candidates go, is this the best we can do? - Reply to this comment
- re: Unity,
Obama''s candidacy seems to bring the racists out of the woodwork at CBS, which gives you some idea of what kind of people climb on the "CBS is liberal" bandwagon. - Reply to this comment
- I don''t think it is possible to make any credible case that the people are not for change. Dems, the MSM, everybody has given the GOP carte blanche to do whatever they want (and still do) and it''s been a failure. Bush''s negotiation through refusing to negotiate has not gotten him the same terms with North Korea we had eight years ago with Clinton.
As for Iran, I know you have to pretend this isn''t happening, but the WH is deliberately trying to escalate tensions there, so you''ll ask these questions. Iran has been the greatest beneficiary of Bush''s foreign policy, and more evidence of his failure does not mean people want more of the same. - Reply to this comment
- UnityDems, I see you managed to get 4 out of 5 of your greatest fears into your post, but you forgot women. I''m sure your afraid of them too.
- Reply to this comment