Add a Comment See all 226 Comments
by setumstrt9 June 13, 2008 1:37 PM EDT
I find it interesting that if anybody asks a question about Obama''s disturbing past, it''s called smearing?
Reply to this comment
by beastof70 June 13, 2008 1:09 PM EDT
Reckon why OsamaObama isn''t playing up more the fact he actually managed to get the endorsement of the only member of the KKK ever to set in the US Senate?

This would shurely help keep folks like the hard core "Yellow Dogs" I heard threatening to break ranks, towing the mark.
Reply to this comment
by beastof70 June 13, 2008 1:02 PM EDT
Can any of you seriously believe 13% of this nations total population, in combination with a handful of looney radical leftists will be able to install an even more liberal George McGovern in black face??

Just asking??
Reply to this comment
by beastof70 June 13, 2008 12:56 PM EDT
Reckon why in the past forty years Americans have only been foolish enough to elect a Democrat to the Executive position....Three times??

Yes, only 12 years over the past forty.

Might this grant us insight into exactly how suspicious real Americans are at having any hyphenated-American sitting on the top of the ticket.

The two Democrats who did manage to get into the White House both lied by claiming to be conservatives.

OsamaObama revels in the fact he''s a nation destroying, #1 ranked most liberal member in the US Senate.
Reply to this comment
by bjrober June 13, 2008 12:50 PM EDT
Be careful what you say about Islam or Muslims.
My sister was talking to her daughter on the phone in Amman, Jordan and said if Obama got the presidence, Islam would take over America. The phone went click, she said everytime anyone calls from America and mentions this the phone is cut off immediately.
Makes you wonder, if I were my niece I wouldn''t be talking to anyone except to say hi, how are you etc. Kind of scary if you ask me.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 June 13, 2008 12:49 PM EDT
Every American should examine the 35 Impeachable Offenses and FRAUD committed by the Republicans during Bush/Cheney%u2019s War on Iraqis Freedom.

http://chun.afterdowningstreet.org/amomentoftruth.pdf

I suggest that the American People should consider a PRE-EMPTIVE Impeachment of the next Republican President.

Reply to this comment
by chitown639 June 13, 2008 12:47 PM EDT
Its gonna be so wonderful to see the nations racists crying a river after Obamas victory in November.... :)
Reply to this comment
by francise223 June 13, 2008 12:46 PM EDT
Between George Soros, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and, not to mention the Obama campaign itself, there has been so much bad blood generated, that they have turned Hillary Clinton supporters into Hillary Clinton fanatics. According to one well-placed Washington source, if 20 percent of the Hillary Clinton voters were to sit out the November Presidential vote, that would amount to a loss of 4 million potential Obama voters--if, indeed, Obama wound up with the nomination in the first place. That could spell certain doom for Obama''s already-doomed candidacy.The only explanation for the behavior of Howard Dean et al. is that they are truly under the thumb of British agent George Soros, and have no interest, whatsoever, in winning in November. If they were consciously out to destroy the Democratic Party altogether, they couldn''t do a better job than they are doing.
Reply to this comment
by francise223 June 13, 2008 12:46 PM EDT
Even after the two parties turned their nominating conventions into ersatz rock concerts, it was always the case that the losing candidates were all given the opportunity to speak from the podium, and a full vote taken, before the anointed candidate was confirmed. Usually, in a gesture of party unity, after the first ballot vote was taken, a motion would be presented to endorse the candidate by unanimous consent. These traditions actually did have the effect of unifying the party, often after a tight and hotly contested primary season, and at least conveyed the idea that the party came out of the convention unified behind the Presidential and Vice Presidential nominees, going into the November general elections.Clearly, between the Obama campaign and Howard Dean, there is a great deal of worry that the vicious campaign that was run against Hillary Clinton has created a level of fury, which could explode at the convention.
Reply to this comment
by francise223 June 13, 2008 12:45 PM EDT
Howard Dean Schemes To Shut Down Democratic ConventionIncrease DecreaseJune 12, 2008 (LPAC)--The latest atrocity to come out of George Soros clone Howard Dean, is that the Democratic National Committee chairman is trying to shut the 18 million loyal Democratic and independent voters who supported Hillary Clinton out of the Denver convention altogether. In addition to reports that the Obama campaign is pushing to actually unseat all the Clinton delegates and replace them with Obama loyalists, there are more recent reports that Howard Dean is trying to prevent any balloting for the Democratic nominee, and instead is trying to just ram through a voice vote for Obama, without a state-by-state roll call.
Reply to this comment
See all 226 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn