Comments on: Did Hillary's RFK Remark Doom Her?
Add a Comment See all 498 Comments
- DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS - TAKE NOTICE
-----------ROE v. WADE-----------
Two of the current justices of the United States Supreme Court will probably retire within the next four years. One is 75 and the other is 84. This will give the new president the ability to nominate two new justices. If McCain is elected you can be sure the new justices will be just like Roberts, Scalia and Thomas: willing to overturn ROE v. WADE. So think when you vote!!! - Reply to this comment
- DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS - TAKE NOTICE
-----------ROE v. WADE-----------
Two of the current justices of the United States Supreme Court will probably retire within the next four years. One is 75 and the other is 84. This will give the new president the ability to nominate two new justices. If McCain is elected you can be sure the new justices will be just like Roberts, Scalia and Thomas: willing to overturn ROE v. WADE. So think when you vote!!! - Reply to this comment
- The more the Obama supporters trash Hillary over the Bobby remark and other issues, the more the feminists and lady supporters of Hillary will be inclined to stay at home in November or vote for McCain.
Posted by andylance1 at 09:19 PM : May 26, 2008
______________
The truth is; these are not people who would vote for Obama under any circumstances. - Reply to this comment
- The truth of the matter is that Hillary is totally delusional. The is the best possible assessment, because if she is not delusional then she is a diabolic, maniac who will resort to suggesting that maybe someone will assassinate Obama. To even use the word "assassinate in an election when one of the candidates is an African American, and where many fear for his life is, at worst, stupid, if not sinister.
- Reply to this comment
- The more the Obama supporters trash Hillary over the Bobby remark and other issues, the more the feminists and lady supporters of Hillary will be inclined to stay at home in November or vote for McCain.
- Reply to this comment
- I can''t understand why the Clintons and their supporters lament that everyone, most importantly the media, were trying to push Hillary out of the race. Are they? Definitely not. This is another typical Clinton spin to delude everyone away from truth. Obama or his campaign staff are never on record as saying the Hillary should quit. On the contrary, Obama had praised her resilience and had said she should finish the race. That is the obvious truth. But then, truth is something so enigma to the Clintons. Hillary now says her reference to RFK''s assassination was actually in the context of the duration of the primary race. Is it or is it another attempt to pull wool over the eye? In 1968 and 1992 the primary season began in March. This time around it began way back in January. So, where is the relevance? The truth of the matter is, what she was saying was that you can never know what can happen, alluding to the fact that something similar to what happened to Bobby Kennedy can happen to Obama and that someone had to remain in the race to pick up the mantle. That is the only TRUTH. Period.
- Reply to this comment
- I usually like to watch CBS news because I thought CBS is less bias than MSNBC. But I can not believe they let this kind of reporting posted in their website.
First, Hillary doesn''t have to ask anyone to stay in the race. She has obligation to stay in the race (DNC and American principle -- everyone has a right to vote). Second, I thought a reporter''s reading and comprehension should be better than me. I was wrong. Now I can interpret it for you. It should be "My husband and Robert Kennedy both ran the race to the middle of June....AND IF ROBERT KENNEDY WAS NOT ASSASSINATED, HE WOULD BE A GREAT PRESIDENT OF OUR TIME..." If you still could not get it, I would have refuse to watch CBS all together. - Reply to this comment
- ...she was talking specifically about timeline and the month of JUNE...
Posted by fenner at 08:44 PM : May 26, 2008
No, she was LYING about why she was sticking around and inflicting damage for far too long. From beginning to end, the effective 1992 primary was over by roughly mid-march, compared to her twisting it to our June, 2008.
And there''s no more "Obama Machine" than "Hillary Machine" and "McCain Machine".
I intended to vote for Clinton, but her politics got too dirty and too weird. Regardless, i would still vote for her against McCain, because he''s obviously not in his right mind anymore... - Reply to this comment
- Posted by fenner at 08:23 PM : May 26, 2008
You have to face the utter inappropriateness of a national figure, like Hillary, intentionally or NOT, calling a deranged supporter to violence. THAT is why assassination talk is considered off-limits.
And with that, the Kennedy''s are at worst, not a party to any of it, and at best, trying to quell the talk of it.
Buy the clue, this is a valid point to criticize Hillary over. - Reply to this comment
- This was Hillary''s most outrageous lie since she got off that plane in Bosnia. Remember her corkscrew landing under sniper fire. And to demonstrate how little she knows about "foreign policy," the only backup she had was her then twelve-year-old daughter, a guitar player and a comedian. GIVE ME A BREAK.
- Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.
