Add a Comment See all 498 Comments
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 6:51 PM EDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 6:47 PM EDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 6:47 PM EDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by gaiaschild-2009 May 24, 2008 6:47 PM EDT
YES her remark doomed her and then again, her apologists are smoothing it over. Even David Brooks, the best conservative God ever made, says he just can''t believe she meant it that way. But more, her entire slippery slide out of leadership into reactivity, meanness, manipulation, deception, denial, cheap shots and dirty tricks and pandering ... those things have tarnished her once enviable position as Chief Female. Maybe for her soul, a good learning experience. But I don''t want any more of it until she rehabilitates herself. Might take about a year of deep reflection. Read all 7 Harry Potter books. Learn from your mistakes.
Reply to this comment
by micmacarac May 24, 2008 6:45 PM EDT
This comment has doomed HILLARY. She will wake up Monday Morning and be 180 delegates behind OBAMA.
.....oh!.......nevermind.........
Reply to this comment
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 6:45 PM EDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by bigmamacoco May 24, 2008 6:44 PM EDT
Here''s an Espresso shot for the Kool-aid drinkers of the Clinton Broadcasting Network: California''s primaries in both ''68 and ''92 were held in June, not in February as it was this year. This would mean that the analogy does not hold up, leaving one only to conclude that Hillary, a lifelong lawyer and public speaker, did not misspeak. What she did was issue a ruthless, tasteless veiled threat...one that no "apology" can ever take back out of the public consciousness. Her statement was akin to a Mafioso saying that a rival "might meet with an unfortunate accident." I wouldn''t be a bit surprised if one of the "hard working Americans" she duped in one of the Midwestern primaries doesn''t see it was his WASPy call to arms and take the fall for "poor Hillary." SAD how this truly evil and unbalanced woman can make misguided puppies out of so many folks. May God help this country if it ever lets another Clinton in a position of authortity again!
Reply to this comment
by opedanderson May 24, 2008 6:43 PM EDT
I think HRC should leave the race, but I dont see how her comments were infering that she was waiting for BO to be killed. That''s a stretch. Keith Obama-man on MSNBC was way over the top to imply that......
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 May 24, 2008 6:42 PM EDT
PUT A SOCK IN IT HILL,
For the first time (maybe in a long time) the Democratic Party had a Presidential Candidate front runner to unite behind such as the Republicans always do, far before the election process even began.

WHAT HAPPENED???

I now shutter to think of what is going to come out of that woman''s mouth next!
Reply to this comment
by rational_1 May 24, 2008 6:37 PM EDT
The RFK reference is an unconscious slip-up on Hillary''s part. She''s probably already thinking of how to Vince Foster poor Obama if she becomes the VP. LOL - this woman''s inability to control her mouth is matched only by her husband''s inability to control his ***.
Reply to this comment
by crater7 May 24, 2008 6:32 PM EDT
THE MEDIA WILL CONTINUE TO FLUFF OBAMA''S PLLOWS AT EVERY CAHNCE.

OBAMA''S LIES WILL CATCH UP TO HIM, AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL VOTE ACCORDINGLY.

"PROFESSOR OBAMA" WILL HAVE TO GO BACK TO HIS FANTASY JOB AS "A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSOR" AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO. A JOB WHICH HE LIED ABOUT BEING A PROFESSOR. HMMMMMM

GOD "BLESS" AMERICA. NOT "G D" AMERICA.
Reply to this comment
by ttdd3 May 24, 2008 6:26 PM EDT
Mention that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said they were not offensive
Reply to this comment
by sandycat2 May 24, 2008 6:24 PM EDT
If you listen to what she said, she was using her husband''s June nomination win and RFK''s death in June as a timeline to show the media and others who have been unmericiously hounding her to get out of the primary that primaries in the past did not end before June. Unfortunately, the use of RFK''s death was a bad choice. She did not as some of these terrible media people say, hope that death wopuld happen to Obama. I just want fairness in a compaign and Clinton did not get any fairness from the media. The media constantly picked on and smeared everything she said and did. Unlike Obama who has been given a free pass until the Wright issue. Obama has lied so many times it makes my head spin, but the Obamamedia refuses to in bring it up as an issue. This sickens me.
Reply to this comment
by crater7 May 24, 2008 6:23 PM EDT
OF COURSE DAVID MARK OF POLITICO.COM WOULD SAY THIS.

HE IS AN OBVIOUS, BIASED OBAMA SUPPORTER. WHICH PLACES HIM THE CATEGORY OF ALL THE OTHER "OBAMA IDIOTS" THAT THINK CLINTON''S STATEMENT WAS ANYTHING OTHER THAN DRAWING ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT THIS WOULD NOT BE THE ONLY RACE THAT HAS LASTED THROUGH JUNE.
RFK''S ASSASSINATION WAS A HISTORICAL EVENT AND ON THIS FORTY YEAR ANIVERSARY PEOPLE WOULD MAKE COMMENTS ABOUT IT. EVEN TED KENNEDY SAID IT WAS NOT MENT IN A HARMFUL AND DISREPECTFUL TONE.

GET OVER IT. STOP WHINNING AND CRYING. GO MAKE MICHELLE HAPPY. BUY HER A PUPPY. MAKE HER PROUD OF HER COUNTRY AGAIN.

GOD "BLESS AMERICA. NOT "G D" AMERICA.
Reply to this comment
by blondchic May 24, 2008 6:21 PM EDT
You have got to be kidding me? Is this the best CBS can do to join the witchhunt against Hillary. Once again, the media is trying to pick the next President. I wonder...does the media want McCain or Obama???
Reply to this comment
by vanesa4 May 24, 2008 6:19 PM EDT
There is a subliminal message in Hillary'' slip... Being the second time she goes this route when speaking in public, I dread the thought of was goes on in her mind when not in public...
We don''t want such devious person in the White House, not as #1 and not as #2. In fact, many of us are sick of seeing her on the campaign trail! She should be more respectful of her own sympathizers, not wasting their donation money to satisfy her personal ambitions.
Reply to this comment
by suzyku May 24, 2008 5:48 PM EDT
I hope the main stream media keeps reporting this story as they did on Obama''s reverend! It''s time that the people of this country see hillary for what she really is-so blinded by her own ambitions that she has no perspective, do anything, say anything to get herself elected! Hopefully it''s finally backfired on her!!!
Reply to this comment
by pagabas May 24, 2008 5:35 PM EDT
Thanks for writing this excellent article. Your analysis is correct. I can''t understand why she will use something as tragic as the assassination of Robert Kennedy in a month of June to justify her staying in the race. She doomed not only her chances to be VP, but potentially of winning a re-election in the senate because people now know her true colors. All she cares about is becoming a President at any cost, asking to re-write the rules in the middle and after the game-
Reply to this comment
See all 498 Comments

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR