Add a Comment See all 37 Comments
by truthyness May 17, 2008 7:36 PM EDT
92% of the Blacks vote for Obama and that''s not racist.

55% of the Whites vote for Clinton and thats racist.

Michelle and Obama whine when the going gets rough.

They constantly remind us about how Obama is going to save the world and how only Obama can do that.

The White media is constantly kissing his Black Azz.

Even the Democratic Leadership gives them every break you can think of.

My disqust is turning to nauseousness.
How much more of this can a reasonable person take???

Reply to this comment
by truthyness May 17, 2008 7:36 PM EDT
92% of the Blacks vote for Obama and that''s not racist.

55% of the Whites vote for Clinton and thats racist.

Michelle and Obama whine when the going gets rough.

They constantly remind us about how Obama is going to save the world and how only Obama can do that.

The White media is constantly kissing his Black Azz.

Even the Democratic Leadership gives them every break you can think of.

My disqust is turning to nauseousness.
How much more of this can a reasonable person take???

Reply to this comment
by truthyness May 17, 2008 7:33 PM EDT
HILLARY OR EVEN McCAIN!!!!

BUT NOBAMA

Reply to this comment
by truthyness May 17, 2008 7:13 PM EDT
HILLARY OR EVEN McCAIN!!!!

BUT NOBAMA
Reply to this comment
by truthyness May 17, 2008 7:13 PM EDT
HILLARY OR EVEN McCAIN!!!!

BUT NOBAMA
Reply to this comment
by truthyness May 17, 2008 7:13 PM EDT
HILLARY OR EVEN McCAIN!!!!

BUT NOBAMA
Reply to this comment
by truthyness May 17, 2008 12:55 PM EDT
The Republicans are playing Blacks for fools.....

and they''re doing a pretty good job of it.
Reply to this comment
by eroosevelt08 May 17, 2008 12:54 PM EDT
This seems to be a pattern with Obama. He does something wrong and then he does the ''''hangdog'''' Sorry Act.

Twenty years with Reverend Wright?

Sorry.

Mrs. Tony Rezko land deal where the Obamas got way more than they paid for when they bought their ritzy home.

Sorry. It was a ''boneheaded'' thing to do.


Said he''d meet with every head of state, which includes the terrorist ones without preconditions? Now he''s flip flopping and says there would be preconditions.....

Oh great, PLEASE NOT another flip flopper on the Democratic ticket.

Calls an adult professional woman Sweetie? That insults women everywhere. I''m NOT his sweetie.

Sorry!

Sorry!

Sorry!!

Sorry!

Super delegates and primary voters: Vote for Clinton so we can fix this Democratic train wreck before we are SORRY IN NOVEMBER!



I am so glad that Senator Clinton has remained in the race. On May 16 I saw Barack Obama blunder big time, when he said that he was ''surprised'' by President Bush''s remarks. For heaven''s sake. The GOP has a target on Obama''s chest and he has given them all kinds of ammunition to use against him, and he is SURPRISED????? Look how easily they got him to go negative!

Heaven help us if Barack Obama wins the nomination because McCain will win.

Reply to this comment
by greenfun May 17, 2008 4:03 AM EDT
Why Aren''t we Complaining about Superdelegate Voter Abuse?


There is this nagging question to which I have still not been able to find a satisfactory answer: Why are the superdelegates being allowed to declare their votes prior to the time that they actually are authorized to vote?
Has this happened before in previous primaries? I don%u2019t remember it being this blatant, if it did. Apparently not, according to CNN.com.

The reason I ask is, isn%u2019t this %u201Cvoter abuse%u201D in the sense that since the superdelegates are the %u201CElectoral College%u201D of the DNC, should they be allowed to influence the primary process long before it is over?

Shouldn''t Howard Dean be saying %u201CWe want the people to be able to vote uninfluenced by the superdelegates, so any superdelegate who declares their vote prior to the time they are authorized to vote, will be penalized by being removed as a superdelegate and a substitute superdelegate will be appointed.%u201D

I am more than a little amazed that we accept this manipulation by the superdelegates as if it is standard operating procedure. Is it? If it is, it is time to change it for the sake of the voters.
Reply to this comment
by eroosevelt08 May 17, 2008 3:42 AM EDT
I am so glad that Senator Clinton has remained in the race. Today I saw Barack Obama blunder big time, when he said that he was ''surprised'' by President Bush''s remarks. For heaven''s sake. The GOP has a target on Obama''s chest and they have all kinds of ammunition to use against him, and he is SURPRISED????? Look how easily they got him to go negative!

Heaven help us if Barack Obama wins the nomination because McCain will win.
Reply to this comment
by ladyesq1 May 16, 2008 11:44 PM EDT
I heard some very troubling news today...I read that the GOP have some very damaging material in their "ruin the democrat" play book that they plan to bring out in October. Apparently, they have some sort of video footage of Michelle obama talking in Rev. Wright''''s church about "whitey" (meaning the white folks). OMG...if this is true, us Democrats are screwed!! We seriously need to nominate Hillary while we still can. GOP is planning on Swift boating Obama like they did Kerry!!!! HELP
Reply to this comment
by truthyness May 16, 2008 10:36 PM EDT
I''t would be UN-Demoratic to not count the votes in Michigan and Florida.

It would be UN-Democratic to not seat their Delegates.

It would be UN-Democratic to not give Hillary Clinton the Delegates proportionate to the votes that she won.

It would be an insult to our intelligence to suggest a 50/50 split or anything less than the delegates Hillary Clinton was given by the vote of the people.

We are well aware that Barack Obama went out of his way to remove his name from the Michigan ballet in an attempt to nullify our votes.

We are well aware that Obama contacted his campaign workers in Michigan and had them urge voters to mark the "none of the above" box on the ballet. He asked them to hold rallys and make radio announcements in an attempt to steal votes from Hillary Clinton.

We are aware that thousands of Hillary Clinton supporters did not even vote in response to being told their vote would not count.

We are well aware that it was Obama himself who denied Michigan and Florida the chance to have a re-vote.

Don''t make us the Democratic Party that decided the American Flag would go back to having only 48 stars.

Reply to this comment
by speakthetrut May 16, 2008 9:38 PM EDT
Hillary "sniper-fire" Clinton continues with her losing campaign, and somebody wanted her debt paid off by Obama campaign.

I say let her out in the rain. She and Bill probably made too many promises to Kazakstan, China, and Taiwan, that they have to get in the White House one way or another. Let them out in the rain, hang them out to dry.
Reply to this comment
by greenfun May 16, 2008 9:32 PM EDT
Obama-Mr. lefty liberal with all of his flip/flops and Wright are going to get clobbered in a general election. Democrats are stupid. Most of Clinton supporters are so disgusted with Obama, the media and rude Obama supporters -they are all ready to sign up with McCain as well.
Reply to this comment
by memekiller May 16, 2008 8:47 PM EDT
McCain''s ad is a little late, isn''t it? Hillary/Obama aren''t really bickering right now. I''m surprised you even bothered to mention her.

An obvious question for McCain has come to mind: if things DON''T improve by 2013, how much longer would he be willing to stay beyond that before he left? Or does he stick by his position that he''ll stay as long as it takes, even if it takes 100 years? So we can begin the 100 year occupation?
Reply to this comment
by kenbomc May 16, 2008 8:32 PM EDT
I just watched the ''Clinton'' ad -it''s not for getting votes, it''s to get donations to pay off her $20 million dollar debt. The first par is all wrong. Commentators are ''washington'' talking about the ups and downs? No wonder why that campaign failed.

McFlip-Flop''s ad is a tad off. The democrats are still in a nomination contest. McSame makes all of these promises without saying how to pay for them. Why? Because he can pretend like he doesn''t have to raise taxes then. McFlip wants to continue spending billions and soon trillionsof dollars on that mistake of a war in Iraq.
Reply to this comment
by kenbomc May 16, 2008 8:25 PM EDT
McFlip-Flop will say whatever it takes to get elected. Just look at his new policy for removing troops from Iraq. McFlip said it would be surrender to move troops out -now he sets a time table. He sets a time table for at least 4 years because he would only serve 1 term as prez meaning he would not have to deliver on that promise. How many times has Bush thrown promises out there? The only thing Bush and his protege McSame are doing are moving the goal posts. It worked for Bush as president -so McFlop is using the same tactics. I don''''t think america will be fooled this time. The only thing McSame can promise is to continue the same failed Bush policies for another 4 years. The ironic thing is they both think they are right and that it is working -don''''t be fooled.
Reply to this comment
See all 37 Comments

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Iran OKs 10 New Uranium Enrichment Sites

    (253 recent comments)